Literature DB >> 29635420

Validation of a biomarker panel in Barrett's esophagus to predict progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

S Eluri1, E Klaver2, L C Duits2, S A Jackson3, J J Bergman2, N J Shaheen1.   

Abstract

In a prior study, baseline mutational load (ML) predicted progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. We aimed to validate the test characteristics of this predictive biomarker panel using crude DNA lysates in a larger well-characterized cohort. We performed a nested case-control study of BE patients from three tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Cases had baseline nondysplastic BE (NDBE) and developed HGD/EAC ≥ 2 years later. Controls were matched 2:1, had baseline NDBE, and no progression. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mutational analysis was performed on crude lysates from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. ML was calculated from loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) at 10 genomic loci. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were created to assess the diagnostic utility of various cutoffs of ML for progression. Of 159 subjects, 58 were progressors and 101 were nonprogressors, there was no difference in mean ML in preprogression tissue in progressors and nonprogressors (ML = 0.73 ± 0.69 vs. ML = 0.74 ± 0.61, P = 0.93). ROC curves showed poor discrimination of ML in predicting progression with AUC of 0.50 at ML ≥ 1. AUC did not vary with different ML cut-points. The utility of the ML to stratify BE patients for risk of progression was not confirmed in this study. The etiology for discrepancies between this and prior studies showing high predictiveness is likely due to the use of crude lysates in this study, but requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29635420      PMCID: PMC6215490          DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  31 in total

Review 1.  Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Mythily Srinivasan; Daniel Sedmak; Scott Jewell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.

Authors:  Erinn Downs-Kelly; Joel E Mendelin; Ana E Bennett; Elias Castilla; Walter H Henricks; Lynn Schoenfield; Marek Skacel; Lisa Yerian; Thomas W Rice; Lisa A Rybicki; Mary P Bronner; John R Goldblum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Predictors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's Esophagus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  M Sikkema; C W N Looman; E W Steyerberg; M Kerkhof; F Kastelein; H van Dekken; A J van Vuuren; W A Bode; H van der Valk; R J T Ouwendijk; R Giard; W Lesterhuis; R Heinhuis; E C Klinkenberg; G A Meijer; F ter Borg; J W Arends; J J Kolkman; J van Baarlen; R A de Vries; A H Mulder; A J P van Tilburg; G J A Offerhaus; F J W ten Kate; J G Kusters; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Barrett's oesophagus: Evidence from the current meta-analyses.

Authors:  Piers Gatenby; Yuen Soon
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Outcome of esophageal adenocarcinoma detected during endoscopic biopsy surveillance for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  R Incarbone; L Bonavina; G Saino; D Bona; A Peracchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Correlation between dysplasia and mutations of six tumor suppressor genes in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  S Raja; S D Finkelstein; F K Baksh; W E Gooding; P A Swalsky; T E Godfrey; P O Buenaventura; J D Luketich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Determination of the frequency of loss of heterozygosity in esophageal adenocarcinoma by cell sorting, whole genome amplification and microsatellite polymorphisms.

Authors:  M T Barrett; P C Galipeau; C A Sanchez; M J Emond; B J Reid
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  NSAIDs modulate CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA content risk for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Patricia C Galipeau; Xiaohong Li; Patricia L Blount; Carlo C Maley; Carissa A Sanchez; Robert D Odze; Kamran Ayub; Peter S Rabinovitch; Thomas L Vaughan; Brian J Reid
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  The Presence of Genetic Mutations at Key Loci Predicts Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; William R Brugge; Ebubekir S Daglilar; Sara A Jackson; Mindi A Styn; Keith M Callenberg; Derek C Welch; Todd M Barr; Lucas C Duits; Jacques J Bergman; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  5 in total

1.  Risk of Cancer in Patients With Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-12

2.  Independent Blinded Validation of a Tissue Systems Pathology Test to Predict Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; John Goldblum; Udhayvir Singh Grewal; Kevin McGrath; Kenneth Fasanella; Christopher Deitrick; Aaron D DeWard; Emily A Bossart; Stephen L Hayward; Yi Zhang; Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne; Prashanthi N Thota
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 3.  Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.

Authors:  Won-Tak Choi; Gregory Y Lauwers; Elizabeth A Montgomery
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 8.209

Review 4.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

5.  A genomic biomarker-based model for cancer risk stratification of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus patients after extended follow up; results from Dutch surveillance cohorts.

Authors:  S J M Hoefnagel; N Mostafavi; M R Timmer; C T Lau; S L Meijer; K K Wang; K K Krishnadath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.