Literature DB >> 21577245

Predictors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's Esophagus: a prospective cohort study.

M Sikkema1, C W N Looman, E W Steyerberg, M Kerkhof, F Kastelein, H van Dekken, A J van Vuuren, W A Bode, H van der Valk, R J T Ouwendijk, R Giard, W Lesterhuis, R Heinhuis, E C Klinkenberg, G A Meijer, F ter Borg, J W Arends, J J Kolkman, J van Baarlen, R A de Vries, A H Mulder, A J P van Tilburg, G J A Offerhaus, F J W ten Kate, J G Kusters, E J Kuipers, P D Siersema.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) have an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). As the absolute risk remains low, there is a need for predictors of neoplastic progression to tailor more individualized surveillance programs. The aim of this study was to identify such predictors of progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC in patients with BE after 4 years of surveillance and to develop a prediction model based on these factors.
METHODS: We included 713 patients with BE (≥ 2 cm) with no dysplasia (ND) or low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Data on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), reflux symptoms, tobacco and alcohol use, medication use, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy findings, and histology were prospectively collected. As part of this study, patients with ND underwent surveillance every 2 years, whereas those with LGD were followed on a yearly basis. Log linear regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with the development of HGD or EAC during surveillance.
RESULTS: After 4 years of follow-up, 26/713 (3.4%) patients developed HGD or EAC, with the remaining 687 patients remaining stable with ND or LGD. Multivariable analysis showed that a known duration of BE of ≥ 10 years (risk ratio (RR) 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-7.8), length of BE (RR 1.11 per cm increase in length; 95% CI 1.01-1.2), esophagitis (RR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3-9.5), and LGD (RR 9.7; 95% CI 4.4-21.5) were significant predictors of progression to HGD or EAC. In a prediction model, we found that the annual risk of developing HGD or EAC in BE varied between 0.3% and up to 40%. Patients with ND and no other risk factors had the lowest risk of developing HGD or EAC (<1%), whereas those with LGD and at least one other risk factor had the highest risk of neoplastic progression (18-40%).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BE, the risk of developing HGD or EAC is predominantly determined by the presence of LGD, a known duration of BE of ≥10 years, longer length of BE, and presence of esophagitis. One or combinations of these risk factors are able to identify patients with a low or high risk of neoplastic progression and could therefore be used to individualize surveillance intervals in BE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21577245     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  58 in total

1.  Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eric M Pauli; Steve J Schomisch; Joseph P Furlan; Andrea S Marks; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Sung Eun Choi; Joel H Rubenstein; Chung Yin Kong; Norman S Nishioka; Dawn T Provenzale; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Siddharth Singh; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; David A Ahlquist; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a prospectively recruited Barrett's oesophagus cohort.

Authors:  B T Theron; H Padmanabhan; H Aladin; P Smith; E Campbell; P Nightingale; B T Cooper; N J Trudgill
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Nimish Vakil; Jacques Bergman; Rebecca Harrison; Robert Odze; Michael Vieth; Scott Sanders; Laura Gay; Oliver Pech; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Yvonne Romero; John Inadomi; Jan Tack; Douglas A Corley; Hendrik Manner; Susi Green; David Al Dulaimi; Haythem Ali; Bill Allum; Mark Anderson; Howard Curtis; Gary Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Grant Fullarton; Kausilia Krishnadath; Stephen J Meltzer; David Armstrong; Robert Ganz; Gianpaolo Cengia; James J Going; John Goldblum; Charles Gordon; Heike Grabsch; Chris Haigh; Michio Hongo; David Johnston; Ricky Forbes-Young; Elaine Kay; Philip Kaye; Toni Lerut; Laurence B Lovat; Lars Lundell; Philip Mairs; Tadakuza Shimoda; Stuart Spechler; Stephen Sontag; Peter Malfertheiner; Iain Murray; Manoj Nanji; David Poller; Krish Ragunath; Jaroslaw Regula; Renzo Cestari; Neil Shepherd; Rajvinder Singh; Hubert J Stein; Nicholas J Talley; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Tony C K Tham; Peter Watson; Lisa Yerian; Massimo Rugge; Thomas W Rice; John Hart; Stuart Gittens; David Hewin; Juergen Hochberger; Peter Kahrilas; Sean Preston; Richard Sampliner; Prateek Sharma; Robert Stuart; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Chris Abley; Duncan Loft; Ian Penman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Amitabh Chak; Gareth Davies; Lorna Dunn; Yngve Falck-Ytter; John Decaestecker; Pradeep Bhandari; Christian Ell; S Michael Griffin; Stephen Attwood; Hugh Barr; John Allen; Mark K Ferguson; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Z Jankowski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Risk factors affecting the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-neoplasia sequence.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 7.  Disease Progression in Barrett's Low-Grade Dysplasia With Radiofrequency Ablation Compared With Surveillance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Sachin Wani; Sherif Gendy; Ben Harnke; Jacques J Bergman; Herbert Wolfsen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fatemeh G Amlashi; Xuemei Wang; Raquel E Davila; Dipen M Maru; Manoop S Bhutani; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian R Weston; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Maria Vassilakopoulou; Kazuto Harada; Mariela A Blum Murphy; David C Rice; Wayne L Hofstetter; Marta Davila; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 9.  Endoscopic risk factors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Angela Bureo Gonzalez; Jacques Jghm Bergman; Roos E Pouw
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ellen Morrow; Daniel Bushyhead; Eelco Wassenaar; Marcelo Hinojosa; Maximiliano Loviscek; Carlos Pellegrini; Brant Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.