Literature DB >> 29634724

A Distalless-responsive enhancer of the Hox gene Sex combs reduced is required for segment- and sex-specific sensory organ development in Drosophila.

Sebnem Ece Eksi1, Olga Barmina2, Christopher L McCallough1, Artyom Kopp2, Teresa Vales Orenic1.   

Abstract

Hox genes are involved in the patterning of animal body parts at multiple levels of regulatory hierarchies. Early expression of Hox genes in different domains along the embryonic anterior-posterior (A/P) axis in insects, vertebrates, and other animals establishes segmental or regional identity. However, Hox gene function is also required later in development for the patterning and morphogenesis of limbs and other organs. In Drosophila, spatiotemporal modulation of Sex combs reduced (Scr) expression within the first thoracic (T1) leg underlies the generation of segment- and sex-specific sense organ patterns. High Scr expression in defined domains of the T1 leg is required for the development of T1-specific transverse bristle rows in both sexes and sex combs in males, implying that the patterning of segment-specific sense organs involves incorporation of Scr into the leg development and sex determination gene networks. We sought to gain insight into this process by identifying the cis-and trans-regulatory factors that direct Scr expression during leg development. We have identified two cis-regulatory elements that control spatially modulated Scr expression within T1 legs. One of these enhancers directs sexually dimorphic expression and is required for the formation of T1-specific bristle patterns. We show that the Distalless and Engrailed homeodomain transcription factors act through sequences in this enhancer to establish elevated Scr expression in spatially defined domains. This enhancer functions to integrate Scr into the intrasegmental gene regulatory network, such that Scr serves as a link between leg patterning, sex determination, and sensory organ development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29634724      PMCID: PMC5909922          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


  65 in total

1.  Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites.

Authors:  Marcus B Noyes; Ryan G Christensen; Atsuya Wakabayashi; Gary D Stormo; Michael H Brodsky; Scot A Wolfe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Genome Regulation by Polycomb and Trithorax: 70 Years and Counting.

Authors:  Bernd Schuettengruber; Henri-Marc Bourbon; Luciano Di Croce; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Shadow enhancers: frequently asked questions about distributed cis-regulatory information and enhancer redundancy.

Authors:  Scott Barolo
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Identification of Polycomb and trithorax group responsive elements in the regulatory region of the Drosophila homeotic gene Sex combs reduced.

Authors:  J G Gindhart; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Transvection and silencing of the Scr homeotic gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Southworth; James A Kennison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes.

Authors:  A C Spradling; D Stern; A Beaton; E J Rhem; T Laverty; N Mozden; S Misra; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Coexpression of the homeobox genes Distal-less and homothorax determines Drosophila antennal identity.

Authors:  P D Dong; J Chu; G Panganiban
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Deformed protein binding sites and cofactor binding sites are required for the function of a small segment-specific regulatory element in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  C Zeng; J Pinsonneault; G Gellon; N McGinnis; W McGinnis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Corto and DSP1 interact and bind to a maintenance element of the Scr Hox gene: understanding the role of Enhancers of trithorax and Polycomb.

Authors:  Juliette Salvaing; Martine Decoville; Emmanuèle Mouchel-Vielh; Marianne Bussière; Anne Daulny; Lidiya Boldyreva; Igor Zhimulev; Daniel Locker; Frédérique Peronnet
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metameres.

Authors:  J Castelli-Gair; M Akam
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  4 in total

1.  A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.

Authors:  Li Tian; Sarthok Rasique Rahman; Briana D Ezray; Luca Franzini; James P Strange; Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Different transcriptional responses by the CRISPRa system in distinct types of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Andrea Ortega-Yáñez; Samantha Cruz-Ruiz; Martha Vázquez; Mario Zurita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Functional analysis of sense organ specification in the Tribolium castaneum larva reveals divergent mechanisms in insects.

Authors:  Marleen Klann; Magdalena Ines Schacht; Matthew Alan Benton; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 4.  Micromanagement of Drosophila Post-Embryonic Development by Hox Genes.

Authors:  Alexandra D Buffry; Alistair P McGregor
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.