Literature DB >> 7555723

How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metameres.

J Castelli-Gair1, M Akam.   

Abstract

In Drosophila, the Hox gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) specifies the development of two different metameres--parasegment 5, which is entirely thoracic, and parasegment 6, which includes most of the first abdominal segment. Here we investigate how a single Hox gene can specify two such different morphologies. We show that, in the early embryo, cells respond similarly to UBX protein in both parasegments. The differences between parasegments 5 and 6 can be explained by the different spatial and temporal pattern of UBX protein expression in these two metameres. We find no evidence for multiple threshold responses to different levels of UBX protein. We examine in particular the role of Ubx in limb development. We show that UBX protein will repress limb primordia before 7 hours, when Ubx is expressed in the abdomen, but not later, when UBX is first expressed in the T3 limb primordium. The regulation of one downstream target of UBX, the Distalless gene, provides a model for this transition at the molecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7555723     DOI: 10.1242/dev.121.9.2973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  33 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mark Cummins; Jose I Pueyo; Steve A Greig; Juan Pablo Couso
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Differential expression patterns of the hox gene are associated with differential growth of insect hind legs.

Authors:  Najmus S Mahfooz; Hua Li; Aleksandar Popadić
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A dynamic network of morphogens and transcription factors patterns the fly leg.

Authors:  Carlos Estella; Roumen Voutev; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A genetic screen of the Drosophila X chromosome for mutations that modify Deformed function.

Authors:  B Florence; W McGinnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider.

Authors:  W G Damen; M Hausdorf; E A Seyfarth; D Tautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional similarity in appendage specification by the Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A Drosophila HOX genes.

Authors:  F Casares; M Calleja; E Sánchez-Herrero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Deletion of a HoxD enhancer induces transcriptional heterochrony leading to transposition of the sacrum.

Authors:  J Zákány; M Gérard; B Favier; D Duboule
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Divergent role of the Hox gene Antennapedia in spiders is responsible for the convergent evolution of abdominal limb repression.

Authors:  Sara Khadjeh; Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann; Evelyn E Schwager; Ernst A Wimmer; Wim G M Damen; Nikola-Michael Prpic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The homeobox gene Distal-less induces ventral appendage development in Drosophila.

Authors:  N Gorfinkiel; G Morata; I Guerrero
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Functional analysis of Ultrabithorax in the silkworm, Bombyx mori, using RNAi.

Authors:  Mika Masumoto; Toshinobu Yaginuma; Teruyuki Niimi
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 0.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.