Theodore J Zwang1, Edmund C M Tse1, Dongping Zhong2, Jacqueline K Barton1. 1. Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States. 2. Departments of Chemistry and Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Abstract
How birds sense the variations in Earth's magnetic field for navigation is poorly understood, although cryptochromes, proteins homologous to photolyases, have been proposed to participate in this magnetic sensing. Here, in electrochemical studies with an applied magnetic field, we monitor the repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer lesions in duplex DNA by photolyase, mutants of photolyase, and a modified cryptochrome. We find that the yield of dimer repair is dependent on the strength and angle of the applied magnetic field even when using magnetic fields weaker than 1 gauss. This high sensitivity to weak magnetic fields depends upon a fast radical pair reaction on the thymines leading to repair. These data illustrate chemically how cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer repair may be used in a biological compass informed by variations in Earth's magnetic field.
How birds sense the variations in Earth's magnetic field for navigation is poorly understood, although cryptochromes, proteins homologous to photolyases, have been proposed to participate in this magnetic sensing. Here, in electrochemical studies with an applied magnetic field, we monitor the repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer lesions in duplex DNA by photolyase, mutants of photolyase, and a modified cryptochrome. We find that the yield of dimer repair is dependent on the strength and angle of the applied magnetic field even when using magnetic fields weaker than 1 gauss. This high sensitivity to weak magnetic fields depends upon a fast radical pair reaction on the thymines leading to repair. These data illustrate chemically how cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer repair may be used in a biological compass informed by variations in Earth's magnetic field.
Migratory birds and
other animals can detect Earth’s magnetic
field to guide navigation, though the mechanisms underlying this magnetic
sensing are unclear.[1] The two mechanisms
proposed to explain the phenomenon of avian magnetoreception are not
mutually exclusive and involve sensing using (i) magnetically sensitive
radical pairs or (ii) magnetic iron-containing nanoparticles.[2] Photolyases are enzymes that repair UV-induced
lesions and contain a highly conserved core structure that could be
involved in such magnetosensitive radical pair chemistry,[3] although experiments exploring the magnetosensitivity
of DNA-bound photolyase have not been reported previously. The conserved
region contains a redox-active flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor,
which absorbs blue light, and carries out electron transfers with
pyrimidine dimer lesions via a cavity in the center of a DNA-binding
groove.[4,5]We have developed electrochemical
methods to monitor the repair
of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) lesions by photolyase.[6]Escherichia coliphotolyase
repairs a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in a reductive catalytic cycle
upon irradiation of the fully reduced flavin cofactor (FADH–) with blue light. CPD lesions form as a result of a photoinduced
[2 + 2] cycloaddition between two adjacent pyrimidines, typically
thymines, on the same DNA strand and significantly kink duplex DNA.
We employ DNA-modified electrodes immersed in aqueous buffer using
DNA charge transport (DNA CT) to monitor repair of the CPD lesion
within a DNA oligonucleotide duplex. DNA CT relies on charge moving through the internal base pair stack of the DNA duplex,
and the efficiency of DNA CT is extremely sensitive to disruptions
in base stacking such as those that arise with a CPD lesion.[7] Upon repair of the CPD by photolyase, DNA regains
its well-stacked structure and is able to support efficient DNA CT
to the flavin cofactor. As a result, the repair of CPD lesions by
photolyase is monitored as an increase in electrochemical response,
because the repair directly improves the yield of DNA-mediated CT
between the electrode and flavin. Figure illustrates this electrical monitoring of
repair through cyclic voltammetry (CV) performed on one set of gold
electrodes modified with duplex DNA containing a CPD, bound by photolyase
and irradiated with blue light. When bound to the CPD, the redox-active
flavin is apparent at −120 mV versus AgCl/Ag, though the signal
is small, owing to the presence of the intervening CPD; upon irradiation,
the photolyase repairs the CPD and the signal increases.
Figure 1
Cyclic voltammetry
of thymine dimer repair by photolyase. (Top)
Reductive catalytic cycle of the flavin cofactor in photolyase to
repair thymine dimers. (Bottom) Cyclic voltammetry on multiplexed
chip electrodes modified with 29 bp dsDNA and backfilled with mercaptohexanol.
The reaction cartoon on the electrode is shown above with corresponding
CV below. (Left) Monolayer of duplex DNA (29 bp), each with a single
thymine dimer (red T□T), is scanned anaerobically at 100 mV/s
in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol,
pH 7.5). (Center) Addition of E. coli photolyase
(50 μM) shows a small flavin redox peak centered around −100
mV vs AgCl/Ag, which is consistent with the fully reduced flavin.
(Right) Irradiation with blue light repairs the thymine dimer over
time and increases the yield of charge transferred through the DNA
duplex to and from the flavin. After subtracting the background current
(dotted line), the area under the reductive peak can be integrated
to give the total charge transferred to the flavin.
Cyclic voltammetry
of thymine dimer repair by photolyase. (Top)
Reductive catalytic cycle of the flavin cofactor in photolyase to
repair thymine dimers. (Bottom) Cyclic voltammetry on multiplexed
chip electrodes modified with 29 bp dsDNA and backfilled with mercaptohexanol.
The reaction cartoon on the electrode is shown above with corresponding
CV below. (Left) Monolayer of duplex DNA (29 bp), each with a single
thymine dimer (red T□T), is scanned anaerobically at 100 mV/s
in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol,
pH 7.5). (Center) Addition of E. coliphotolyase
(50 μM) shows a small flavin redox peak centered around −100
mV vs AgCl/Ag, which is consistent with the fully reduced flavin.
(Right) Irradiation with blue light repairs the thymine dimer over
time and increases the yield of charge transferred through the DNA
duplex to and from the flavin. After subtracting the background current
(dotted line), the area under the reductive peak can be integrated
to give the total charge transferred to the flavin.We can explore directly how a magnetic field affects
the DNA repair
reaction carried out by photolyase using this electrochemistry in
the presence of a magnetic field. Indeed, the electrode serves to
orient the DNA and DNA reaction relative to the magnetic field. Previous
experiments have monitored changes in the transient absorption spectra
of photolyase in the presence of a magnetic field,[8] but in the absence of DNA; it is therefore unclear from
these experiments how photolyase activity on its DNA substrate is
affected by a magnetic field. Indeed, we find a remarkable sensitivity
to low strength magnetic fields in this reaction to repair cyclopyrimidine
dimers and not only by photolyase but also by a truncated cryptochrome,
the protein family thought to be responsible for magnetoreception
generally.
Results and Discussion
Effects of Magnetic Fields on the Photolyase
Reaction
Multiplexed chips consisting of 16 separate DNA-modified
gold electrodes
allow for the simultaneous or sequential comparison of four distinct
monolayers created under identical conditions with 4-fold redundancy,[9] and thus these multiplexed chips allow the evaluation
of the effects of magnetic fields on the photolyase reaction in a
well-controlled system. Figure shows representative data from a single multiplexed chip
where two quadrants were incubated with the same thiolated duplex
DNA containing a thymine dimer (T□T); the third quadrant contains
duplex DNA with a C:A mismatch intervening between the T□T
and the gold surface, and the last quadrant contains duplex DNA with
no dimer or mismatches. When photolyase is added to a monolayer of
duplex DNA, containing a T□T (29 bp duplexes, ∼8 pmol/cm2) in the absence of an applied magnetic field, irradiation
with blue light (405 ± 10 nm) leads to the increase in current
for the FADH– redox couple. Importantly, the gold
surface uniformly orients the DNA as well as the DNA-bound photolyase.
Shining light on an identical monolayer but in the presence of an
applied magnetic field, however, leads to a significant decrease in
the yield of charge transferred over the same period of time. The
lack of signal on the electrode modified with DNA but without the
T□T shows that the photolyase binds specifically to its substrate
CPD lesion. Furthermore, incorporating a single mismatch significantly
decreases the yield of charge transferred to the flavin, indicating
that the flavin is reduced and oxidized by charge transferred through the DNA duplex; perturbations to the base stack
as occurs with a mismatch are sufficient to decrease DNA CT.
Figure 2
Integrated
cyclic voltammetry measurement of a representative multiplexed
chip over time irradiated. (Top) Representation of the multiplexed
chip and the different duplex DNA monolayers and experimental conditions
that were tested. (Bottom) Plot of the area under the reductive peak,
which gives the total amount of charge transferred to the flavin,
over time irradiated. The color of traces corresponds to the quadrants
shown in the representation above. In each case, 50 μM photolyase
was added and irradiated with blue light at t = 0
anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA,
10% glycerol, pH 7.5). In the green quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained
no thymine dimer. In the red quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained a
thymine dimer and a C:A mismatch between the dimer and the electrode
surface. In the black quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained a thymine
dimer. In the blue quadrant, the same 29 bp dsDNA containing a thymine
dimer was used as was tested in the black quadrant, but the entire
experiment was conducted with a 560 G magnetic field pointing perpendicularly
up intersecting the plane of the electrode. Standard error was plotted
with n = 4.
Integrated
cyclic voltammetry measurement of a representative multiplexed
chip over time irradiated. (Top) Representation of the multiplexed
chip and the different duplex DNA monolayers and experimental conditions
that were tested. (Bottom) Plot of the area under the reductive peak,
which gives the total amount of charge transferred to the flavin,
over time irradiated. The color of traces corresponds to the quadrants
shown in the representation above. In each case, 50 μM photolyase
was added and irradiated with blue light at t = 0
anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA,
10% glycerol, pH 7.5). In the green quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained
no thymine dimer. In the red quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained a
thymine dimer and a C:A mismatch between the dimer and the electrode
surface. In the black quadrant, the 29 bp dsDNA contained a thymine
dimer. In the blue quadrant, the same 29 bp dsDNA containing a thymine
dimer was used as was tested in the black quadrant, but the entire
experiment was conducted with a 560 G magnetic field pointing perpendicularly
up intersecting the plane of the electrode. Standard error was plotted
with n = 4.Control experiments show that the protein is still active
after
multiple hours of incubation in a magnetic field and that the protein
binds competitively to CPD-containing duplex DNA (Figure S1). There is also no distinguishable difference when
adding this CPD-containing duplex DNA in the presence or absence of
a magnetic field, suggesting that the magnetic field does not cause
a significant change in photolyase affinity for CPD. Assays with a
SQUID magnetometer furthermore show that there is no magnetite on
the electrode surface that is influencing this chemistry (Figure S2).The magnetic field influence
on the yield of DNA CT depends upon
when the magnetic field is applied during the reaction. The presence
or absence of an externally applied magnetic field during flavin photoreduction,
before the incubation of the protein with the duplex DNA substrate,
does not influence the signal during repair (Figure S3). Importantly, removing the magnetic field during repair
restores the yield of charge transfer (Figure ). After repair has been completed, adding
a magnetic field has no influence on the yield of charge transferred.
Randles–Sevcik analysis (Figure S4) demonstrates that photolyase diffuses away from surface of the
DNA-modified electrode when there is no applied magnetic field, associated
with repair of the CPD and lowering of the protein affinity, but the
photolyase stays bound to the surface with an applied magnetic field.
Together, these data indicate that the presence of the magnetic field
during repair directly inhibits the efficiency of repair.
Figure 3
Total amount
of charge transferred over time irradiated with varying
magnetic field conditions. First, 50 μM photolyase was added
to a monolayer of 29 bp dsDNA with T□T and irradiated with
blue light (t = 0) anaerobically in the absence (black)
or presence (blue) of a 30 G magnetic field applied perpendicularly
up intersecting the plane of the electrode. At the time indicated
by the dotted line the magnetic field was either applied (gray) or
removed (light blue) to switch the magnetic field conditions in a
given experiment. Standard error was plotted with n = 4.
Total amount
of charge transferred over time irradiated with varying
magnetic field conditions. First, 50 μM photolyase was added
to a monolayer of 29 bp dsDNA with T□T and irradiated with
blue light (t = 0) anaerobically in the absence (black)
or presence (blue) of a 30 G magnetic field applied perpendicularly
up intersecting the plane of the electrode. At the time indicated
by the dotted line the magnetic field was either applied (gray) or
removed (light blue) to switch the magnetic field conditions in a
given experiment. Standard error was plotted with n = 4.Figure illustrates
how the repair efficiency varies with magnetic field strength and
angle. Significantly, at weak magnetic fields, the magnetic field
strength plays an important role in the efficiency of dimer repair.
The background magnetic field during our experiments was measured
to be 0.4 G and resulted in the highest yield of repair. However,
applying an additional magnetic field perpendicular to the surface
as weak as 0.2 G results in diminished yield. Increasing the field
strength further decreases the yield, but eventually the effect is
saturated; applied fields of 30 and 6000 G result in the same magnitude
decrease in yield. As a control, we also examined the enzymatic restriction
of an oligonucleotide by HincII; as expected, this
reaction is not influenced by the presence of a magnetic field, nor
by irradiation (Figure S14).
Figure 4
Total amount
of charge transferred over time irradiated with varying
magnetic field strengths and angles. In all experiments photolyase
(50 μM) was added to 29 bp dsDNA-modified electrodes containing
T□T and then irradiated with blue light (t = 0) anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1
mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5). (Top left) The background magnetic
field was 0.4 G, and the applied field was added to give the total
field strength listed to the right of the plot. (Top right) The magnetic
field was applied perpendicularly up intersecting the plane of the
electrode surface. The magnetic field angle was varied by applying
a 30 G field (top right) or 0.4 G field (bottom right) at either a
0°, 45°, or 90° angle relative to the plane of the
electrode surface. (Bottom left) The approximate angles at which the
magnetic fields intersect thymine dimers are illustrated. The redox
potential of the flavin lies negative of the potential of zero charge
of the working electrode. At this potential the duplexes line up approximately
normal to the electrode surface, meaning that the thymines are approximately
parallel to the surface.[9] The largest magnetic
field effect occurs when the field intersects the dimer perpendicular
to the plane of the bases, and the weakest effect occurs when the
field is parallel to the plane of the bases. Standard error was plotted
with n ≥ 4.
Total amount
of charge transferred over time irradiated with varying
magnetic field strengths and angles. In all experiments photolyase
(50 μM) was added to 29 bp dsDNA-modified electrodes containing
T□T and then irradiated with blue light (t = 0) anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1
mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5). (Top left) The background magnetic
field was 0.4 G, and the applied field was added to give the total
field strength listed to the right of the plot. (Top right) The magnetic
field was applied perpendicularly up intersecting the plane of the
electrode surface. The magnetic field angle was varied by applying
a 30 G field (top right) or 0.4 G field (bottom right) at either a
0°, 45°, or 90° angle relative to the plane of the
electrode surface. (Bottom left) The approximate angles at which the
magnetic fields intersect thymine dimers are illustrated. The redox
potential of the flavin lies negative of the potential of zero charge
of the working electrode. At this potential the duplexes line up approximately
normal to the electrode surface, meaning that the thymines are approximately
parallel to the surface.[9] The largest magnetic
field effect occurs when the field intersects the dimer perpendicular
to the plane of the bases, and the weakest effect occurs when the
field is parallel to the plane of the bases. Standard error was plotted
with n ≥ 4.Moreover, the angle of the magnetic field relative to the
plane
of the electrode significantly influences the yield. A magnetic field
perpendicular to the plane of the electrode exhibits the largest effect.
Changing the angle of inclination to 45° diminishes the effect,
as does applying a field parallel to the plane of the surface. Interestingly,
there is no difference in yield observed for a magnetic field pointing
perpendicularly up versus perpendicularly down (Figure S5), which suggests that only the angle of the field
and not the polarity direction of the field is important.[10]These results clearly illustrate that
the CPD reaction is sensitive
to low magnetic field strengths and field direction. These data are
reminiscent of experiments carried out by N. J. Turro, who established
conditions critical for observation of reactions controlled by weak
magnetic fields.[11] What is required is
a competition between two processes: one that is magnetic field dependent
and one that is magnetic field independent. Figure illustrates the CPD repair reaction carried
out by photolyase.[12] Here radical pair
formation followed by electron transfer leads either to separation
of the two repaired thymines or to futile back electron transfer without
repair. Thus, the magnetic field dependent radical pair affects the
efficiency of the subsequent bond-breaking repair reaction.
Figure 5
Radical repair
scheme for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) based
on previous work.[11] Forward electron transfer
from the fully reduced flavin results in a radical residing on the
CPD. First the C5–C5′ bond splits, followed by either
C6–C6′ bond splitting or futile back electron transfer
to the CPD state. Following bond splitting, either the radical residing
on the pyrimidine can undergo electron return to the flavin, resulting
in the completion of the repair process, or the radical can facilitate
CPD formation and undergo futile back electron transfer.
Radical repair
scheme for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) based
on previous work.[11] Forward electron transfer
from the fully reduced flavin results in a radical residing on the
CPD. First the C5–C5′ bond splits, followed by either
C6–C6′ bond splitting or futile back electron transfer
to the CPD state. Following bond splitting, either the radical residing
on the pyrimidine can undergo electron return to the flavin, resulting
in the completion of the repair process, or the radical can facilitate
CPD formation and undergo futile back electron transfer.
Mutations in Photolyase and the CPD Lesion
To examine
the factors governing this reaction in more detail, we tested mutants
of photolyase that perturb the internal electron transfer pathways.
In particular, we would expect mutations that affect the lifetime
of the CPD radical pair to be most sensitive to magnetic field effects.
Radical pairs that involve both the flavin and dimer radical anion
could serve also as magnetically sensitive intermediates in the repair
reaction. Photoactivation of FAD initiates electron transfers along
a conserved triad of tryptophan residues that gives a flavin radical
(FAD•) and a tryptophan radical (TrpH+•) that have been shown through transient absorption spectroscopy
to be sensitive to weak applied magnetic fields (in the range of 30–390
G); this range is, however, stronger than the earth’s magnetic
field (0.25–0.65 G).[3] Multiple photolyase
active site mutants were previously characterized using ultrafast
spectroscopy to determine the rates of electron transfer and bond
breaking steps in CPD repair in the absence of a magnetic field.[12−15] The mutant N378C interacts with the flavin and displays slow forward
electron transfer from the flavin to the dimer and only slightly reduced
electron return from the thymine radical to the flavin. M345A interacts
with both the dimer and the flavin and shows increased rates for forward
electron transfer and electron return. E274A also interacts with both
the flavin and the dimer and has faster electron return but slower
forward electron transfer. As shown in Figure , we find that both of the mutations near
the dimer eliminate magnetosensitivity. In contrast, the N378C mutant
retains magnetosensitivity despite having a destabilized flavin radical,
which has its redox potential shifted −100 mV relative to WT
(Figure S6). The magnetosensitivity of
these mutants correlates with slower electron return and does not
correlate with forward electron transfer or quantum yield of CPD repair.[13] Importantly, these results point to the radical
pair on the pyrimidine dimer as the critical player rather than radical
pairs that involve the flavin.
Figure 6
Effect of structural perturbations on
magnetosensitivity. (Top)
Cartoon showing placement of thymine dimer relative to flavin cofactor
and three active site residues in photolyase. Positions of residues adapted from DNA-bound photolyase crystal structure.[15] (Middle) Comparison of the yield of charge transferred
to different active site mutants with and without 30 G magnetic field
perpendicularly intersecting the plane of the electrode surface after
60 min of irradiation with blue light anaerobically in Tris buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5). (Bottom)
Comparison of the yield of charge transferred to different cyclobutane
pyrimidine dimers with and without 30 G magnetic field perpendicularly
intersecting the plane of the electrode surface after 60 min of irradiation
with blue light. For these dimers U = uracil, T = thymine, and the
5′ position is listed first with the 3′ position second.
Standard error was included with n ≥ 6. *Lifetimes
of thymine radicals with mutant photolyase were obtained from C. Tan et al.[13] **Lifetimes of different dimer radicals were obtained from
Z. Liu et al.[14]
Effect of structural perturbations on
magnetosensitivity. (Top)
Cartoon showing placement of thymine dimer relative to flavin cofactor
and three active site residues in photolyase. Positions of residues adapted from DNA-bound photolyase crystal structure.[15] (Middle) Comparison of the yield of charge transferred
to different active site mutants with and without 30 G magnetic field
perpendicularly intersecting the plane of the electrode surface after
60 min of irradiation with blue light anaerobically in Tris buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5). (Bottom)
Comparison of the yield of charge transferred to different cyclobutane
pyrimidine dimers with and without 30 G magnetic field perpendicularly
intersecting the plane of the electrode surface after 60 min of irradiation
with blue light. For these dimers U = uracil, T = thymine, and the
5′ position is listed first with the 3′ position second.
Standard error was included with n ≥ 6. *Lifetimes
of thymine radicals with mutant photolyase were obtained from C. Tan et al.[13] **Lifetimes of different dimer radicals were obtained from
Z. Liu et al.[14]Repair of uracil-containing dimers further reveal the underlying
basis for magnetosensitivity. In these experiments the repair of T□T,
U□T, T□U, and U□U dimers were monitored with
and without an applied magnetic field and are presented in Figure . The U□U
dimer has diminished but significant magnetosensitivity. Both the
U□T and T□U dimers show no significant magnetosensitivity,
despite the T□U having a radical lifetime on par with the U□U,
and the U□T having a longer radical lifetime than any of the
other dimers.[14] Together these data argue
further that perturbation in the uracil/thymine radical pairs most
affect the magnetosensitivity of CPD repair.These data thus
allow us to pinpoint the likely source of magnetosensitivity
in photolyase repair: the pyrimidine dimer. Active site mutations
near the CPD as well as changes in the CPD structure eliminate magnetosensitivity,
but the N378C mutation near the flavin and away from the CPD retains
magnetosensitivity. The crucial condition for observation of magnetic
field effects is a competition between two processes, and the magnetic
field changes their relative favorability.[11] As illustrated in Figure , our data show that the competition either to maintain or
to repair the CPD is shifted toward maintenance with an externally
applied magnetic field. The magnetosensitive chemistry serves to perturb
the favorability of C6–C6′ splitting that results in
repaired CPD and futile back electron transfer that maintains the
CPD.[13] Rapid singlet–triplet interconversion,
as has been observed in biradical species, can change the favorability
of bond cleavage versus reformation.[16] A
second competition occurs after the C6–C6′ splitting
because the radical resides on one of the pyrimidines long enough
that it may recreate the dimer before it safely returns to the flavin.[13,17] However, the limited influence of the N378C mutant on magnetosensitivity
suggests that this second process is unlikely to be the primary source
of competition. Weak magnetic fields on the order of 10–100
G can influence the equilibrium between singlet and triplet states
and change the reaction products of biradical species,[18] similar to what occurs during CPD repair on
the thymine dimer. It is not immediately clear why CPD repair is still
more sensitive than these reactions, but the short radical lifetimes
and very fast equilibration between singlet and triplet states may
be critical factors. The confinement of the thymine dimer within the
photolyase binding pocket may further aid the magnetosensitivity of
the radical pair by constraining conformation, thereby stabilizing
the relative energy of the singlet and triplet states and minimizing
energy changes caused by conformational motion that has previously
been shown to overwhelm magnetic field effects. Certainly these data
serve to highlight that it is the radical pair on the thymines that
leads to the magnetosensitivity.
Reaction of a Truncated
Cryptochrome in the Absence and Presence
of a Magnetic Field
If it is the radical pair of the thymine
dimer that is critical to the biological compass, the relevance to
magnetoreception by the homologous cryptochromes becomes difficult
to understand. Cryptochromes have been implicated in magnetosensitive
processes in both animals and plants.[19] Cryptochromes are essentially defined by their homology to photolyases
but also by their inability to carry out CPD repair.[1,20] Explanations for this inability to repair CPD lesions range from
structural differences in the domains of cryptochromes versus photolyases
to the possibility that their inability to repair CPD is reliant on
special conditions. In cryptochromes, C-terminal extensions appear
to block the DNA-binding pocket and could prevent CPD repair except
under conditions where the extensions are released.[21,22] Few crystal structures of cryptochromes are available, however a
crystal structure of ArabidopsisCRY1photolyase-homologous
region, a model of ArabidopsisCRY2photolyase-homologous
region, and a crystal structure of Drosophilacryptochrome
show partial conservation of the positively charged groove of photolyase
that could allow for DNA to associate with the active site if the
C-terminal extension were released from this region.[22−26] It is important to note that ArabidopsisCRY2-GFP
fusion proteins bind to chromosomes within mitotic cells.[12] It is also noteworthy that a single amino acid
substitution has previously revealed photolyase activity in Arabidopsiscry1 attributed to stabilization of the reduced
flavin; here poor DNA binding was cited as a possible reason for its
very low efficiency.[27]We therefore
tested a truncated Arabidopsis thalianacryptochrome
1 lacking the C-terminal extension (AtCRY1ΔC)
for CPD repair in the presence and absence of an applied magnetic
field. The truncated cryptochrome is 509 amino acids in length and
lacks the entire C-terminal tail (172 amino acids). The crystal structure
of AtCRY1ΔC has also been
reported,[28] and while it has been shown
specifically that the wild type protein does not repair dsDNA,[29] there are no reports describing the ability
of this truncated protein to repair dsDNA. We therefore tested repair
by the truncated protein both in solution and electrochemically. The
truncated protein, AtCRY1ΔC, was first incubated with dsDNA containing T□T and irradiated
with blue light in aqueous solution. HPLC traces of the DNA before
and after incubation show that AtCRY1ΔC repairs T□T similarly to the photolyase (Figure S7). We used matrix assisted laser desorption
ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF) to characterize
the mass of the CPD-containing oligonucleotide before and after incubation
with AtCRY1ΔC and found that
while the HPLC mobility had changed, the m/z did not shift, as would be expected with dimer repair.
We then used a phosphodiesterase to digest the DNA before and after
incubation with AtCRY1ΔC. The peak characteristic
of the thymine dimer dinucleotide, distinct from the individual nucleotides,
was identified using HPLC combined with time-of-flight mass spectrometry,
and this peak decreased upon incubation with AtCRY1ΔC,
but only in the presence of blue light; this result chemically confirms
that the CPD is being repaired by irradiation of the cryptochrome
(Figures S12 and S13).Thymine dimer
repair by AtCRY1ΔC was then
monitored both electrochemically and in solution in the
presence and absence of a magnetic field (Figure ). When the cryptochrome is added to a monolayer
of duplex DNA containing T□T in the absence of an applied magnetic
field, irradiation with blue light leads to the increase in current
for the FAD redox couple (Figures , S8). Shining light on
an identical monolayer in the presence of an applied magnetic field,
however, leads to a significant reduction in the yield of charge transferred
over the same period of time, consistent with the change observed
for photolyase. In solution, where the protein bound to DNA is randomly
oriented, quantitation of the DNA by digestion following irradiation
shows a decrease in the T□T dinucleotide in the absence of
a magnetic field, consistent with repair upon irradiation, but a similar
decrease is evident also in the presence of the magnetic field (Figure ). Thus, repair in
solution requires irradiation but is insensitive to magnetic field
direction. This result contrasts experiments conducted on the DNA-modified
electrode, consistent with the idea that protein orientation is needed
for magnetosensitivity. Whether such orientation is provided biologically
on chromatin requires examination. It should be noted also that the
diminished signal on the electrode modified with DNA without thymine
dimers shows that AtCRY1ΔC binds preferentially to the CPD lesion (Figure S9). Binding of AtCRY1ΔC to dsDNA containing a CPD lesion was further confirmed using electrophoretic
mobility shift experiments (Figure S10).
Figure 7
Monitoring
CPD repair by cryptochrome (AtCRY1ΔC).
(Top) Electrochemical experiments show the total amount of charge
transferred to the flavin of AtCRY1ΔC over time irradiated with varying magnetic field angles.
50 μM cryptochrome was added to a monolayer of 29 bp dsDNA with
T□T and irradiated with blue light (t = 0)
anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA,
10% glycerol, pH 7.5). The background magnetic field was 0.4 G, and
the applied field was added to this to give the total field strength
of 30 G. The magnetic field angle was varied by applying the magnetic
field at either a 0°, 45°, or 90° angle relative to
the plane of the electrode surface. Standard error was plotted with n = 4. (Bottom) Monitoring CPD repair with AtCRY1ΔC by HPLC. Duplex DNA containing T□T
was incubated under anaerobic conditions in solution for 1 h at ambient
temperature with AtCRY1ΔC with
and without a 6600 G magnetic field, and in the presence or absence
of blue light. Phosphodiesterase I was then used to digest the DNA,
and the HPLC peak characteristic of the thymine dimer (inset) was
quantified and compared.
Monitoring
CPD repair by cryptochrome (AtCRY1ΔC).
(Top) Electrochemical experiments show the total amount of charge
transferred to the flavin of AtCRY1ΔC over time irradiated with varying magnetic field angles.
50 μM cryptochrome was added to a monolayer of 29 bp dsDNA with
T□T and irradiated with blue light (t = 0)
anaerobically in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA,
10% glycerol, pH 7.5). The background magnetic field was 0.4 G, and
the applied field was added to this to give the total field strength
of 30 G. The magnetic field angle was varied by applying the magnetic
field at either a 0°, 45°, or 90° angle relative to
the plane of the electrode surface. Standard error was plotted with n = 4. (Bottom) Monitoring CPD repair with AtCRY1ΔC by HPLC. Duplex DNA containing T□T
was incubated under anaerobic conditions in solution for 1 h at ambient
temperature with AtCRY1ΔC with
and without a 6600 G magnetic field, and in the presence or absence
of blue light. Phosphodiesterase I was then used to digest the DNA,
and the HPLC peak characteristic of the thymine dimer (inset) was
quantified and compared.Importantly, and consistent with the experiments on photolyase,
the angle of the magnetic field relative to the plane of the electrode
significantly influences the yield of dimer repair by the cryptochrome
(Figure ). A magnetic
field perpendicular to the plane of the electrode exhibits the largest
effect. Changing the angle of inclination to 45° diminishes the
effect, as does applying a field parallel to the plane of the surface.
Thus, a cryptochrome with its C-terminal domain removed can in fact
serve as a compass by carrying out the CPD repair reaction. Indeed,
binding of the C-terminal domain may prevent DNA from accessing the
flavin and provide a regulatory element for the reaction.
Conclusions
These experiments illustrate the design of a biological compass
that functions at weak magnetic field strengths. Weak magnetic fields
significantly affect the repair of CPD lesions by E. coliphotolyase and by A. thalianacryptochrome with
removal of its C-terminal domain. This magnetosensitivity is dependent
on the magnetic field strength and direction. What is central to the
magnetosensitivity we observe with photolyase and cryptochrome is
the CPD repair reaction, a reaction involving a short-lived radical
pair that governs a subsequent bond-breaking reaction, the dimer repair.
Experiments with photolyase active site mutants and uracil-containing
lesions point to radical pair chemistry on the CPD as the source of
magnetosensitivity. These experiments offer insight into a plausible
way that nature could use radical pair chemistry to sense the angle
of magnetic fields as weak as Earth’s and certainly suggest
the need to examine more closely whether CPD repair plays any role in vivo in magnetic sensing.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings
of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable
request.
Authors: Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sarah Burney; Ringo Wenzel; Tilman Kottke; Thomas Roussel; Nathalie Hoang; Jean-Pierre Bouly; Robert Bittl; Joachim Heberle; Margaret Ahmad Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alexandra Mees; Tobias Klar; Petra Gnau; Ulrich Hennecke; Andre P M Eker; Thomas Carell; Lars-Oliver Essen Journal: Science Date: 2004-12-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Anand T Vaidya; Deniz Top; Craig C Manahan; Joshua M Tokuda; Sheng Zhang; Lois Pollack; Michael W Young; Brian R Crane Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 11.205