Literature DB >> 29632183

Molecular mechanism of activation of human musk receptors OR5AN1 and OR1A1 by (R)-muscone and diverse other musk-smelling compounds.

Lucky Ahmed1, Yuetian Zhang2, Eric Block3, Michael Buehl4, Michael J Corr4, Rodrigo A Cormanich5, Sivaji Gundala6, Hiroaki Matsunami7,8, David O'Hagan9, Mehmet Ozbil1, Yi Pan2, Sivakumar Sekharan1, Nicholas Ten1, Mingan Wang10, Mingyan Yang4,10, Qingzhi Zhang4, Ruina Zhang2, Victor S Batista11, Hanyi Zhuang12,13.   

Abstract

Understanding olfaction at the molecular level is challenging due to the lack of crystallographic models of odorant receptors (ORs). To better understand the molecular mechanism of OR activation, we focused on chiral (R)-muscone and other musk-smelling odorants due to their great importance and widespread use in perfumery and traditional medicine, as well as environmental concerns associated with bioaccumulation of musks with estrogenic/antiestrogenic properties. We experimentally and computationally examined the activation of human receptors OR5AN1 and OR1A1, recently identified as specifically responding to musk compounds. OR5AN1 responds at nanomolar concentrations to musk ketone and robustly to macrocyclic sulfoxides and fluorine-substituted macrocyclic ketones; OR1A1 responds only to nitromusks. Structural models of OR5AN1 and OR1A1 based on quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) hybrid methods were validated through direct comparisons with activation profiles from site-directed mutagenesis experiments and analysis of binding energies for 35 musk-related odorants. The experimentally found chiral selectivity of OR5AN1 to (R)- over (S)-muscone was also computationally confirmed for muscone and fluorinated (R)-muscone analogs. Structural models show that OR5AN1, highly responsive to nitromusks over macrocyclic musks, stabilizes odorants by hydrogen bonding to Tyr260 of transmembrane α-helix 6 and hydrophobic interactions with surrounding aromatic residues Phe105, Phe194, and Phe207. The binding of OR1A1 to nitromusks is stabilized by hydrogen bonding to Tyr258 along with hydrophobic interactions with surrounding aromatic residues Tyr251 and Phe206. Hydrophobic/nonpolar and hydrogen bonding interactions contribute, respectively, 77% and 13% to the odorant binding affinities, as shown by an atom-based quantitative structure-activity relationship model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecular dynamics; musk; odorant receptor; olfaction; quantum mechanics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29632183      PMCID: PMC5924878          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713026115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

Review 1.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function.

Authors:  John L Klepeis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Opsin, a structural model for olfactory receptors?

Authors:  Jung Hee Park; Takefumi Morizumi; Yafang Li; Joo Eun Hong; Emil F Pai; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver P Ernst
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Experimental evaluation of the generalized vibrational theory of G protein-coupled receptor activation.

Authors:  Ross D Hoehn; David E Nichols; John D McCorvy; Hartmut Neven; Sabre Kais
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discrimination between olfactory receptor agonists and non-agonists.

Authors:  Jérémie Topin; Claire A de March; Landry Charlier; Catherine Ronin; Serge Antonczak; Jérôme Golebiowski
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  Enantioselective intramolecular aldol addition/dehydration reaction of a macrocyclic diketone: synthesis of the musk odorants (R)-muscone and (R,Z)-5-muscenone.

Authors:  Oliver Knopff; Jérôme Kuhne; Charles Fehr
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Endocrine effects of polycyclic musks: do we smell a rat?

Authors:  Bart van der Burg; Richard Schreurs; Sander van der Linden; Willem Seinen; Abraham Brouwer; Edwin Sonneveld
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2007-10-31

7.  (+)-(R,Z)-5-Muscenone and (-)-(R)-muscone by enantioselective aldol reaction and Grob fragmentation.

Authors:  Charles Fehr; Andrea K Buzas; Oliver Knopff; Jean-Yves de Saint Laumer
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.236

8.  Fluorine in fragrances: exploring the difluoromethylene (CF2) group as a conformational constraint in macrocyclic musk lactones.

Authors:  Michael J Corr; Rodrigo A Cormanich; Cortney N von Hahmann; Michael Bühl; David B Cordes; Alexandra M Z Slawin; David O'Hagan
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Revisiting olfactory receptors as putative drivers of cancer.

Authors:  Marco Ranzani; Vivek Iyer; Ximena Ibarra-Soria; Martin Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera; Mathew Garnett; Darren Logan; David J Adams
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2017-02-10

10.  Molecular vibration-sensing component in human olfaction.

Authors:  Simon Gane; Dimitris Georganakis; Klio Maniati; Manolis Vamvakias; Nikitas Ragoussis; Efthimios M C Skoulakis; Luca Turin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase.

Authors:  Claire A de March; Yosuke Fukutani; Aashutosh Vihani; Hitoshi Kida; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Characterizing human odorant signals: insights from insect semiochemistry and in silico modelling.

Authors:  Ashish Radadiya; John A Pickett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Protective effects of muscone on traumatic spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Chao Yu; Fei Gui; Qian Huang; Yuanmeng Luo; Zili Zeng; Ruifu Li; Liang Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

4.  Mammalian class I odorant receptors exhibit a conserved vestibular-binding pocket.

Authors:  Caroline Bushdid; Claire A de March; Jérémie Topin; Matthew Do; Hiroaki Matsunami; Jérôme Golebiowski
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Copper-mediated thiol potentiation and mutagenesis-guided modeling suggest a highly conserved copper-binding motif in human OR2M3.

Authors:  Franziska Haag; Lucky Ahmed; Krystle Reiss; Eric Block; Victor S Batista; Dietmar Krautwurst
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Multiscale Molecular Modeling in G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR)-Ligand Studies.

Authors:  Pratanphorn Nakliang; Raudah Lazim; Hyerim Chang; Sun Choi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-04-19

7.  Machine Learning Assisted Approach for Finding Novel High Activity Agonists of Human Ectopic Olfactory Receptors.

Authors:  Amara Jabeen; Claire A de March; Hiroaki Matsunami; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  High-speed rail model reveals the gene tandem amplification mediated by short repeated sequence in eukaryote.

Authors:  Haidi Chen; Jingwen Xue; Zhenghou Zhang; Geyu Zhang; Xinyuan Xu; He Li; Ruxue Zhang; Najeeb Ullah; Lvxing Chen; Zhuqing Zang; Shanshan Lai; Ximiao He; Wei Li; Miao Guan; Jingyi Li; Liangbiao Chen; Cheng Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Predicting Human Olfactory Perception from Activities of Odorant Receptors.

Authors:  Joel Kowalewski; Anandasankar Ray
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-07-12

10.  Bitter Taste and Olfactory Receptors: Beyond Chemical Sensing in the Tongue and the Nose.

Authors:  Mercedes Alfonso-Prieto
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.