Literature DB >> 29629239

Sub-Airy Confocal Adaptive Optics Scanning Ophthalmoscopy.

Nripun Sredar1, Oladipo E Fagbemi2, Alfredo Dubra1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the viability of improving transverse image resolution in reflectance scanning adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy using sub-Airy disk confocal detection.
METHODS: The foveal cone mosaic was imaged in five human subjects free of known eye disease using two custom adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopes (AOSLOs) in reflectance with 7.75 and 4.30 mm pupil diameters. Confocal pinholes of 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 Airy disk diameters (ADDs) were used in a retinal conjugate plane before the light detector. Average cone photoreceptor intensity profile width and power spectrum were calculated for the resulting images. Detected energy using a model eye was recorded for each pinhole size.
RESULTS: The cone photoreceptor mosaic is better resolved with decreasing confocal pinhole size, with the high spatial frequency content of the images enhanced in both the large- and small-pupil AOSLOs. The average cone intensity profile width was reduced by ∼15% with the use of a 0.5 ADD pinhole when compared to a 1.0 ADD, with an accompanying reduction in signal greater than a factor of four.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of sub-Airy disk confocal pinhole detection without increasing retinal light exposure results in a substantial improvement in image resolution at the cost of larger than predicted signal reduction. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Improvement in transverse resolution using sub-Airy disk confocal detection is a practical and low-cost approach that is applicable to all point- and line-scanning ophthalmoscopes, including optical coherence tomographers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive optics; confocal; ophthalmoscopy; retinal imaging

Year:  2018        PMID: 29629239      PMCID: PMC5886094          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.2.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  32 in total

1.  Absolute electronic retinal stereophotography.

Authors:  H J NORTON
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  R H Webb; G W Hughes; F C Delori
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  MEMS-based adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Yuhua Zhang; Siddharth Poonja; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  In-the-plane design of an off-axis ophthalmic adaptive optics system using toroidal mirrors.

Authors:  Zhuolin Liu; Omer P Kocaoglu; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography for in vivo retinal imaging in mice.

Authors:  Yifan Jian; Jing Xu; Martin A Gradowski; Stefano Bonora; Robert J Zawadzki; Marinko V Sarunic
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Authors:  Kaccie Y Li; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.925

8.  Reflective afocal broadband adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Alfredo Dubra; Yusufu Sulai
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Spatial and temporal variation of rod photoreceptor reflectance in the human retina.

Authors:  Robert F Cooper; Adam M Dubis; Ashavini Pavaskar; Jungtae Rha; Alfredo Dubra; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Alfredo Dubra; Yusufu Sulai; Jennifer L Norris; Robert F Cooper; Adam M Dubis; David R Williams; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of confocal and non-confocal split-detection cone photoreceptor imaging.

Authors:  Nripun Sredar; Moataz Razeen; Bartlomiej Kowalski; Joseph Carroll; Alfredo Dubra
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Wide-vergence, multi-spectral adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope with diffraction-limited illumination and collection.

Authors:  Sanam Mozaffari; Francesco LaRocca; Volker Jaedicke; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Super-resolution retinal imaging using optically reassigned scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Theodore B DuBose; Francesco LaRocca; Sina Farsiu; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  Nat Photonics       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 38.771

4.  Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Raphaël Turcotte; Donald T Miller; Kazuhiro Kurokawa; Jared R Males; Na Ji; Martin J Booth
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 5.  Adaptive optics imaging of the human retina.

Authors:  Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Raymond L Warner; Thomas J Gast
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Super-resolution ophthalmoscopy: Virtually structured detection for resolution improvement in retinal imaging.

Authors:  Xincheng Yao; Rongwen Lu; Benquan Wang; Yiming Lu; Tae-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  RAC-CNN: multimodal deep learning based automatic detection and classification of rod and cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images.

Authors:  David Cunefare; Alison L Huckenpahler; Emily J Patterson; Alfredo Dubra; Joseph Carroll; Sina Farsiu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 8.  Promises and pitfalls of evaluating photoreceptor-based retinal disease with adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO).

Authors:  Niamh Wynne; Joseph Carroll; Jacque L Duncan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 19.704

Review 9.  Cellular imaging of inherited retinal diseases using adaptive optics.

Authors:  Jasdeep S Gill; Mariya Moosajee; Adam M Dubis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic.

Authors:  Jenna A Cava; Mitchell T Allphin; Rebecca R Mastey; Mina Gaffney; Rachel E Linderman; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.