| Literature DB >> 29628734 |
Abstract
The emerging science of nanotechnology, especially within the dental and medical fields, sparked a research interest in their potential applications and benefits in comparison to conventional materials used. Therefore, a better understanding of the science behind nanotechnology is essential to appreciate how these materials can be utilised in our daily practice. The present paper will help the reader understand nanoscience, and the benefits and limitations of nanotechnology by addressing its ethical, social, and health implications. Additionally, nano-applications in dental diagnostics, dental prevention, and in dental materials will be addressed, with examples of commercially available products and evidence on their clinical performance.Entities:
Keywords: Nanodentistry; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology
Year: 2018 PMID: 29628734 PMCID: PMC5884254 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Detection principles in nano-biosensors.
| Detection Principle | Definition |
|---|---|
| Piezoelectric | Piezoelectric biosensors have the ability to generate an electrical charge in response to mechanical stress, and the translation of mechanical energy to electrical energy is called the piezoelectric effect ( |
| Electrochemical | This detection principle starts with the analyte (target) chemically binding to the highly specific bioreceptor (e.g. a fixed enzyme), affecting the electronic properties of the sensor, and ultimately generating a readable signal ( |
| Optical | Optical nanosensors give quantitative measurements on an intracellular level. It converts the biorecognition of the analyte into an optical signal ( |
| Calorimetric | Thermal biosensors or calorimetric biosensors rely on the rate of enzymatic exothermic reaction to measure the concentration of the analyte |
Commonly used commercially available nanomaterials.
| Discipline | Classification | Material | Brand | Nanoparticles | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prosthodontics | Denture teeth | Nano-hybrid composite | NHC SR Phonares®; Ivoclar Vivadent | Silicon oxide | – Significantly higher wear in comparison to interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) and double crosslinking polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture teeth ( |
| Veracia (Shofu, Kyoto, Japan) | Spherical pre-polymerised silica | – Superior to conventionally used composites and acrylics in regards to hardness, smoothness, and stain resistance. However, its hardness was less than microfilled and double crosslinked acrylics. ( | |||
| Conservative | Restorations | Nano-Resin modified GIC | Ketac™ Nano | Zirconia/silica nanofillers & nanoclusters | – Higher shear bond strength to enamel compared to GIC, and glass carbomer. ( |
| Nano-Composite Resins | Herculite XR Ultra, Kerr | Nanosilica | – Both materials exhibited high gloss values in comparison to micro-hybrid composites. | ||
| Tetric Evo ceram, IvoclarVivadent | SO2 spherical nanofillers | ||||
| Filtek Supreme (3M) | – Non-aggregated 20 nm silica filler, | – Lower compressive strength in comparison to hybrid composite resin ( | |||
| Ceram.x® Mono™ and Ceram.x® Duo™. Dentsply | Organically modified nano sized ceramic fillers comprising polysiloxane backbone (10 nm) | – Comparable compressive strength in comparison to hybrid composite. ( | |||
| Nano-GIC | GCP Glass Fill ™, GCP Dental. | Carbomised fluorapatite/hydroxyapatite nano particles | – Lower hardness and bond strength to dentine than high viscosity GIC. ( | ||
| Cavity Disinfectant | Mineral solution | NanoCare gold® DNT™ | Spherical silver nanoparticles (48 nm) | – Moderately anti-bacterial. | |
| Endodontics | Sealer | Silicon based | GuttaFlow™ Colténe-Whaledent | Nano-silver | – Comparable sealing ability to AH Plus ( |
| Periodontics | Grafts | Bone grafts | NanoBone®Artoss GmbH® | Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite | – Comparable to BioOss® in its low cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility. It additionally exhibited superior MTT proliferation results ( |
| Ostims, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany | Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite | – Comparable clinical results in cases of two and three wall intra-bony defects to autogenous bone grafts. ( | |||
| Implantology | Nano-implant coating | – | NonoTite BIOMET 3i | Nano-hydroxyapatite (around 50% of total surface area) | – Clinically favorable osseointegration with minimum marginal bone loss (1.01 mm), however studies were not randomized, had no controls, and were followed up for only one year ( |