Literature DB >> 29627956

Dynamics of habitat selection in birds: adaptive response to nest predation depends on multiple factors.

J H Devries1,2, R G Clark3,4, L M Armstrong5.   

Abstract

According to theory, habitat selection by organisms should reflect underlying habitat-specific fitness consequences and, in birds, reproductive success has a strong impact on population growth in many species. Understanding processes affecting habitat selection also is critically important for guiding conservation initiatives. Northern pintails (Anas acuta) are migratory, temperate-nesting birds that breed in greatest concentrations in the prairies of North America and their population remains below conservation goals. Habitat loss and changing land use practices may have decoupled formerly reliable fitness cues with respect to nest habitat choices. We used data from 62 waterfowl nesting study sites across prairie Canada (1997-2009) to examine nest survival, a primary fitness metric, at multiple scales, in combination with estimates of habitat selection (i.e., nests versus random points), to test for evidence of adaptive habitat choices. We used the same habitat covariates in both analyses. Pintail nest survival varied with nest initiation date, nest habitat, pintail breeding pair density, landscape composition and annual moisture. Selection of nesting habitat reflected patterns in nest survival in some cases, indicating adaptive selection, but strength of habitat selection varied seasonally and depended on population density and landscape composition. Adaptive selection was most evident late in the breeding season, at low breeding densities and in cropland-dominated landscapes. Strikingly, at high breeding density, habitat choice appears to become maladaptive relative to nest predation. At larger spatial scales, the relative availability of habitats with low versus high nest survival, and changing land use practices, may limit the reproductive potential of pintails.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agroecosystems; Conservation; Habitat use; Northern pintail; Reproductive success

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627956     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4134-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal.

Authors:  Floris M van Beest; Antonio Uzal; Eric Vander Wal; Michel P Laforge; Adrienne L Contasti; David Colville; Philip D McLoughlin
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions.

Authors:  Philip D McLoughlin; Douglas W Morris; Daniel Fortin; Eric Vander Wal; Adrienne L Contasti
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection.

Authors:  Philip D McLoughlin; Mark S Boyce; Tim Coulson; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Habitat selection and the perceptual trap.

Authors:  Michael A Patten; Jeffrey F Kelly
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals.

Authors:  Cameron S Gillies; Mark Hebblewhite; Scott E Nielsen; Meg A Krawchuk; Cameron L Aldridge; Jacqueline L Frair; D Joanne Saher; Cameron E Stevens; Christopher L Jerde
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Multiple density-dependence mechanisms regulate a migratory bird population during the breeding season.

Authors:  Nicholas L Rodenhouse; T Scott Sillett; Patrick J Doran; Richard T Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Time-lagged variation in pond density and primary productivity affects duck nest survival in the Prairie Pothole Region.

Authors:  Johann Walker; Jay J Rotella; Scott E Stephens; Mark S Lindberg; James K Ringelman; Christine Hunter; Aaron J Smith
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Nonideal breeding habitat selection: a mismatch between preference and fitness.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  P-values as percentiles. Commentary on: "Null hypothesis significance tests. A mix-up of two different theories: the basis for widespread confusion and numerous misinterpretations".

Authors:  Jose D Perezgonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Linking landscape-scale conservation to regional and continental outcomes for a migratory species.

Authors:  B J Mattsson; J H Devries; J A Dubovsky; D Semmens; W E Thogmartin; J J Derbridge; L Lopez-Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.