Literature DB >> 19732211

Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions.

Philip D McLoughlin1, Douglas W Morris, Daniel Fortin, Eric Vander Wal, Adrienne L Contasti.   

Abstract

1. Describing distribution and abundance is requisite to exploring interactions between organisms and their environment. Recently, the resource selection function (RSF) has emerged to replace many of the statistical procedures used to quantify resource selection by animals. 2. A RSF is defined by characteristics measured on resource units such that its value for a unit is proportional to the probability of that unit being used by an organism. It is solved using a variety of techniques, particularly the binomial generalized linear model. 3. Observing dynamics in a RSF - obtaining substantially different functions at different times or places for the same species - alerts us to the varying ecological processes that underlie resource selection. 4. We believe that there is a need for us to reacquaint ourselves with ecological theory when interpreting RSF models. We outline a suite of factors likely to govern ecologically based variation in a RSF. In particular, we draw attention to competition and density-dependent habitat selection, the role of predation, longitudinal changes in resource availability and functional responses in resource use. 5. How best to incorporate governing factors in a RSF is currently in a state of development; however, we see promise in the inclusion of random as well as fixed effects in resource selection models, and matched case-control logistic regression. 6. Investigating the basis of ecological dynamics in a RSF will allow us to develop more robust models when applied to forecasting the spatial distribution of animals. It may also further our understanding of the relative importance of ecological interactions on the distribution and abundance of species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19732211     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01613.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  35 in total

1.  Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; Mark Hebblewhite; Anne Loison; Mark Fuller; Roger Powell; Mathieu Basille; Bram Van Moorter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs.

Authors:  Hawthorne L Beyer; Daniel T Haydon; Juan M Morales; Jacqueline L Frair; Mark Hebblewhite; Michael Mitchell; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dynamics of habitat selection in birds: adaptive response to nest predation depends on multiple factors.

Authors:  J H Devries; R G Clark; L M Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Density-dependent habitat selection and partitioning between two sympatric ungulates.

Authors:  Floris M van Beest; Philip D McLoughlin; Eric Vander Wal; Ryan K Brook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  When species' ranges meet: assessing differences in habitat selection between sympatric large carnivores.

Authors:  Geir Rune Rauset; Jenny Mattisson; Henrik Andrén; Guillaume Chapron; Jens Persson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection.

Authors:  Martin Leclerc; Eric Vander Wal; Andreas Zedrosser; Jon E Swenson; Jonas Kindberg; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Avoidance of roads and selection for recent cutovers by threatened caribou: fitness-rewarding or maladaptive behaviour?

Authors:  Christian Dussault; Véronique Pinard; Jean-Pierre Ouellet; Réhaume Courtois; Daniel Fortin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Habitat selection by wolves and mountain lions during summer in western Montana.

Authors:  Collin J Peterson; Michael S Mitchell; Nicholas J DeCesare; Chad J Bishop; Sarah S Sells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anthropogenic resource subsidies determine space use by Australian arid zone dingoes: an improved resource selection modelling approach.

Authors:  Thomas M Newsome; Guy-Anthony Ballard; Christopher R Dickman; Peter J S Fleming; Chris Howden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.