Literature DB >> 16777736

Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection.

Philip D McLoughlin1, Mark S Boyce, Tim Coulson, Tim Clutton-Brock.   

Abstract

Individuals are predicted to maximize lifetime reproductive success (LRS) through selective use of resources; however, a wide range of ecological and social processes may prevent individuals from always using the highest-quality resources available. Resource selection functions (RSFs) estimate the relative amount of time an individual spends using a resource as a function of the proportional availability of that resource. We quantified the association between LRS and coefficients of individual-based RSFs describing lifetime resource selection for 267 female red deer (Cervus elaphus) of the Isle of Rum, Scotland, from 1970 to 2001. LRS was significantly related to first- and second-order effects of selection for Agrostis/Festuca grassland and proximity to the sea coast (quality of forage within Agrostis/Festuca grassland was highest nearest the coast (ratio of short:long grassland)). The benefits of selecting for quality in Agrostis/Festuca grassland, however, traded-off with increases in LRS gained by avoiding conspecific density. LRS was inversely associated with local density, which was highest along the coast, and reproductive benefits of selecting Agrostis/Festuca grassland diminished with increasing density. We discuss the relevance of these results to our understanding of the spatial distribution of red deer abundance, and potential applications of our approach to evolutionary and applied ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16777736      PMCID: PMC1560319          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

Review 1.  Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection.

Authors:  M Delibes; P Gaona; P Ferreras
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Lars Gustafsson; Hannu Pietiäinen; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

  3 in total
  28 in total

1.  Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; Mark Hebblewhite; Anne Loison; Mark Fuller; Roger Powell; Mathieu Basille; Bram Van Moorter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs.

Authors:  Hawthorne L Beyer; Daniel T Haydon; Juan M Morales; Jacqueline L Frair; Mark Hebblewhite; Michael Mitchell; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dynamics of habitat selection in birds: adaptive response to nest predation depends on multiple factors.

Authors:  J H Devries; R G Clark; L M Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predicting population change from models based on habitat availability and utilization.

Authors:  Jason Matthiopoulos; Christopher Field; Ross MacLeod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mesoscale activity facilitates energy gain in a top predator.

Authors:  Briana Abrahms; Kylie L Scales; Elliott L Hazen; Steven J Bograd; Robert S Schick; Patrick W Robinson; Daniel P Costa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Influence of local and landscape factors on distributional dynamics: a species-centred, fitness-based approach.

Authors:  Aaron D Flesch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Temperature constraints on foraging behaviour of male Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) in summer.

Authors:  Jean-François Aublet; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Domenico Bergero; Bruno Bassano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection.

Authors:  Martin Leclerc; Eric Vander Wal; Andreas Zedrosser; Jon E Swenson; Jonas Kindberg; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Individual differences, density dependence and offspring birth traits in a population of red deer.

Authors:  Katie V Stopher; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Tim Coulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates.

Authors:  Andrew M Kittle; John M Fryxell; Glenn E Desy; Joe Hamr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.