Literature DB >> 29627857

Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?

Cristina Iani1,2, Luca Ferraro3, Natale Vincenzo Maiorana3, Vittorio Gallese4, Sandro Rubichi5,6.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether in a stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task affordance effects in response to picture of graspable objects emerge when these objects appear as already grasped. It also assessed whether the observed effects could be explained as due to spatial compatibility between the most salient part in the object/display and the hand of response rather than to action potentiation. To this aim, we conducted three behavioural experiments in which participants were required to discriminate the vertical orientation (upright vs. inverted) of an object presented in the centre of the screen, while ignoring the right-left orientation of its handle. The object could be presented alone, as already grasped, as partially masked (Experiment 1) or with a human hand close to its graspable side (Experiment 2). In addition, to assess the role of perceptual salience, the object could be presented with a human hand or a non-biological (a geometrical shape) distractor located opposite to the object's graspable side. Results showed faster responses when the object's handle was located on the same side of the responding hand with a larger effect when upright objects were shown as already grasped (Experiment 1) or when a hand was displayed close to its handle (Experiment 2), and a smaller reversed effect when the hand or the geometrical shape was located opposite to the handled side (Experiment 3). We interpreted these findings as indicating that handle orientation effects emerging in SRC tasks may result from the interplay between motor affordance and spatial compatibility mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627857     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  51 in total

1.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.

Authors:  M Brass; H Bekkering; W Prinz
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-01

2.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

3.  Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task.

Authors:  R F Murray; A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

4.  Attentional processes link perception and action.

Authors:  Stephen J Anderson; Noriko Yamagishi; Vivian Karavia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Claudia Bonfiglioli; Luisa Lugli; Paola Ricciardelli; Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Cristina Iani; Elena Gherri; Fabio Benatti; Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-10-01

8.  Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification.

Authors:  Eun Young Yoon; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

Review 9.  Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream.

Authors:  L L Chao; A Martin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli.

Authors:  Antonello Pellicano; Cristina Iani; Natale Vincenzo Maiorana; Houpand Horoufchin; Sandro Rubichi; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Ferdinand Binkofski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-21

2.  Does a look of fear prompt to act? The effects of gaze and face emotional expression on manipulable objects.

Authors:  Elisa Scerrati; Sandro Rubichi; Cristina Iani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias.

Authors:  Kinga Wołoszyn; Mateusz Hohol; Michał Kuniecki; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.