Literature DB >> 11256338

Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.

M Brass1, H Bekkering, W Prinz.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to examine the hypothesis that stimulus-response arrangements with high ideomotor compatibility lead to substantial compatibility effects even in simple response tasks. In Experiment 1, participants executed pre-instructed finger movements in response to compatible and incompatible finger movements. A pronounced reaction time advantage was found for compatible as compared to incompatible trials. Experiment 2 revealed a much smaller compatibility effect for less ideomotor-compatible object movements compared to finger movements. Experiment 3 presented normal stimuli (hand upright) and flipped stimuli (hand upside-down). Two components were found to contribute to the compatibility effect, a dynamic spatial compatibility component (related to movement directions) and an ideomotor component (related to movement types). The implications of these results for theories about stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) as well as for theories about imitation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11256338     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  174 in total

1.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

3.  Event coding and motor priming: how attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties.

Authors:  Brenda Ocampo; David R Painter; Ada Kritikos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation.

Authors:  Rémi L Capa; Peter J Marshall; Thomas F Shipley; Robin N Salesse; Cédric A Bouquet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-29

6.  Automatic imitation in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Incidental action observation modulates muscle activity.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The development of grasping comprehension in infancy: covert shifts of attention caused by referential actions.

Authors:  Moritz M Daum; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Sociomotor action control.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Lisa Weller; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

10.  Recall of observed actions modulates the end-state comfort effect just like recall of one's own actions.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.