Literature DB >> 29626266

Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

T Lehnert1, O H Günther1, A Hajek1, S G Riedel-Heller2, H H König3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most people prefer to "age in place" and to remain in their homes for as long as possible even in case they require long-term care. While informal care is projected to decrease in Germany, the use of home- and community-based services (HCBS) can be expected to increase in the future. Preference-based data on aspects of HCBS is needed to optimize person-centered care.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services packages.
DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment conducted in mailed survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected sample of the general population aged 45-64 years in Germany (n = 1.209). MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Preferences and marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for HCBS were assessed with respect to five HCBS attributes (with 2-4 levels): care time per day, service level of the HCBS provider, quality of care, number of different caregivers per month, co-payment.
RESULTS: Quality of care was the most important attribute to respondents and small teams of regular caregivers (1-2) were preferred over larger teams. Yet, an extended range of services of the HCBS provider was not preferred over a more narrow range. WTP per hour of HCBS was €8.98.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings on preferences for HCBS in the general population in Germany add to the growing international evidence of preferences for LTC. In light of the great importance of high care quality to respondents, reimbursement for services by HCBS providers could be more strongly linked to the quality of services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete choice experiment; Long-term care; Old age assistance; Preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29626266     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  38 in total

1.  Are consumer-directed home care beneficiaries satisfied? Evidence from Washington state.

Authors:  Joshua M Wiener; Wayne L Anderson; Galina Khatutsky
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2007-12

2.  The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua K Swift; Jennifer L Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-04

3.  The value of a QALY: individual willingness to pay for health gains under risk.

Authors:  Ana Bobinac; Job van Exel; Frans F H Rutten; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan.

Authors:  John Creighton Campbell; Naoki Ikegami; Mary Jo Gibson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Measuring patient-centered care: An updated systematic review of how studies define and report concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments.

Authors:  Karen Winn; Elissa Ozanne; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-03-21

6.  [Analysis of public quality reports for home care and long-term care with respect to their usefulness for the customer].

Authors:  Susanne Sünderkamp; Christian Weiß; Heinz Rothgang
Journal:  Pflege       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.655

Review 7.  Measuring Person-centered Care: A Critical Comparative Review of Published Tools.

Authors:  David Edvardsson; Anthea Innes
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-06-21

8.  Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Emily Lancsar; Nicola McCaffrey; Gang Chen; Liz Gill; Ian D Cameron; Maria Crotty; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Trade-off Between Quality, Price, and Profit Orientation in Germany's Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Charlene Harrington; Daniel Schumacher; Rike Kraska
Journal:  Ageing Int       Date:  2015-10-17
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effect Evaluation of the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) System on the Health Care of the Elderly: A Review.

Authors:  Linhong Chen; Xiaocang Xu
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-08-25

2.  The Challenge of Sustaining Long-term Care in Aging Societies: Lessons From Japan and Spain Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".

Authors:  Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio; Dolores Jiménez-Rubio
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Current Status and Challenges of Community-Based Elderly Care Centers in Chongqing, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ziyi Yang; Yi Jiang; Min Wang; Huan Zeng
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-12-14

4.  The impact of long-term care insurance in China on beneficiaries and caregivers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Simiao Chen; Linye Li; Juntao Yang; Lirui Jiao; Todd Golden; Zhuoran Wang; Haitao Liu; Peixin Wu; Till Bärnighausen; Pascal Geldsetzer; Chen Wang
Journal:  J Glob Health Econ Policy       Date:  2021-11-16

5.  Older People's Long-Term Care Preferences in China: The Impact of Living with Grandchildren on Older People's Willingness and Family Decisions.

Authors:  Tongbo Deng; Yafan Fan; Mengdi Wu; Min Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.