Literature DB >> 26210656

Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.

Billingsley Kaambwa1, Emily Lancsar2, Nicola McCaffrey3, Gang Chen3, Liz Gill4, Ian D Cameron4, Maria Crotty5, Julie Ratcliffe3.   

Abstract

Consumer directed care (CDC) is currently being embraced internationally as a means to promote autonomy and choice for consumers (people aged 65 and over) receiving community aged care services (CACSs). CDC involves giving CACS clients (consumers and informal carers of consumers) control over how CACSs are administered. However, CDC models have largely developed in the absence of evidence on clients' views and preferences. We explored CACS clients' preferences for a variety of CDC attributes and identified factors that may influence these preferences and potentially inform improved design of future CDC models. Study participants were clients of CACSs delivered by five Australian providers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach undertaken in a group setting between June and December 2013, we investigated the relative importance to CACS consumers and informal (family) carers of gradations relating to six salient features of CDC (choice of service provider(s), budget management, saving unused/unspent funds, choice of support/care worker(s), support-worker flexibility and level of contact with service coordinator). The DCE data were analysed using conditional, mixed and generalised logit regression models, accounting for preference and scale heterogeneity. Mean ages for 117 study participants were 80 years (87 consumers) and 74 years (30 informal carers). All participants preferred a CDC approach that allowed them to: save unused funds from a CACS package for future use; have support workers that were flexible in terms of changing activities within their CACS care plan and; choose the support workers that provide their day-to-day CACSs. The CDC attributes found to be important to both consumers and informal carers receiving CACSs will inform the design of future CDC models of service delivery. The DCE approach used in this study has the potential for wide applicability and facilitates the assessment of preferences for elements of potential future aged care service delivery not yet available in policy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community aged care services; Consumer directed care; Consumers; Discrete choice experiment; Informal carers; Personal budgets

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210656     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  T Lehnert; O H Günther; A Hajek; S G Riedel-Heller; H H König
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-06

Review 2.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The Best of Both Worlds: An Example Mixed Methods Approach to Understand Men's Preferences for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Authors:  Divine Ikenwilo; Sebastian Heidenreich; Mandy Ryan; Colette Mankowski; Jameel Nazir; Verity Watson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Predicting EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utilities from Older People's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (OPQoL-Brief) Scores.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzana Karim; Benjamin M Craig; Caroline Vass; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.558

6.  An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Liz Gill; Nicola McCaffrey; Emily Lancsar; Ian D Cameron; Maria Crotty; Len Gray; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Unpaid Informal Caregivers in South Australia: Population Characteristics, Prevalence and Age-Period-Cohort Effects 1994-2014.

Authors:  Anne F Stacey; Tiffany K Gill; Kay Price; Rosemary Warmington; Anne W Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects and meanings of a person-centred and health-promoting intervention in home care services - a study protocol of a non-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karin Bölenius; Kristina Lämås; Per-Olof Sandman; David Edvardsson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  How do clients in Australia experience Consumer Directed Care?

Authors:  Liz Gill; Sandra L Bradley; Ian D Cameron; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  M Plöthner; K Schmidt; L de Jong; J Zeidler; K Damm
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.