Literature DB >> 29622854

Dynamic beam filtering for miscentered patients.

Andrew Mao1, William Shyr1, Grace J Gang1, J Webster Stayman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate centering of the patient within the bore of a CT scanner takes time and is often difficult to achieve precisely. Patient miscentering can result in significant dose and image noise penalties with the use of traditional bowtie filters. This work describes a system to dynamically position an x-ray beam filter during image acquisition to enable more consistent image performance and potentially lower dose needed for CT imaging.
METHODS: We propose a new approach in which two orthogonal low-dose scout images are used to estimate a parametric model of the object describing its shape, size, and location within the field of view (FOV). This model is then used to compute an optimal filter motion profile by minimizing the variance of the expected detector fluence for each projection. Dynamic filtration was implemented on a cone-beam CT (CBCT) test bench using two different physical filters: 1) an aluminum bowtie and 2) a structured binary filter called a multiple aperture device (MAD). Dynamic filtration performance was compared to a static filter in studies of dose and reconstruction noise as a function of the degree of miscentering of a homogeneous water phantom.
RESULTS: Estimated filter trajectories were found to be largely sinusoidal with an amplitude proportional to the amount of miscentering. Dynamic filtration demonstrated an improved ability to keep the spatial distribution of dose and reconstruction noise at baseline levels across varying levels of miscentering, reducing the maximum noise and dose deviation from 53% to 15% and 42% to 14% respectively for the bowtie filter, and 25% to 8% and 24% to 15% respectively for the MAD filter.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic positioning of beam filters during acquisition improves dose utilization and image quality over static filters for miscentered patients. Such dynamic filters relax positioning requirements and have the potential to reduce set-up time and lower dose requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient centering; dynamic filtration; fluence-field modulation; multiple aperture devices

Year:  2018        PMID: 29622854      PMCID: PMC5881587          DOI: 10.1117/12.2293696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  5 in total

1.  Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Andrew DuPlissis; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Fluence-Field Modulated X-ray CT using Multiple Aperture Devices.

Authors:  J Webster Stayman; Aswin Mathews; Wojciech Zbijewski; Grace Gang; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Satomi Kawamoto; Ira Blevis; Reuven Levinson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-22

3.  Design of dual multiple aperture devices for dynamical fluence field modulated CT.

Authors:  Aswin John Mathews; Steven Tilley; Grace Gang; Satomi Kawamoto; Wojciech Zbijewski; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Reuven Levinson; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Conf Proc Int Conf Image Form Xray Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-07

4.  Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array.

Authors:  R L Siddon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise.

Authors:  Thomas Toth; Zhanyu Ge; Michael P Daly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic fluence field modulation for miscentered patients in computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew Mao; Grace J Gang; William Shyr; Reuven Levinson; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Satomi Kawamoto; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-10-24

2.  Dynamic fluence field modulation in computed tomography using multiple aperture devices.

Authors:  Grace J Gang; Andrew Mao; Wenying Wang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Aswin Mathews; Satomi Kawamoto; Reuven Levinson; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Predicting image properties in penalized-likelihood reconstructions of flat-panel CBCT.

Authors:  Wenying Wang; Grace J Gang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.