Literature DB >> 29622501

Hepatic Steatosis Assessment with Ultrasound Small-Window Entropy Imaging.

Zhuhuang Zhou1, Dar-In Tai2, Yung-Liang Wan3, Jeng-Hwei Tseng4, Yi-Ru Lin5, Shuicai Wu6, Kuen-Cheh Yang7, Yin-Yin Liao8, Chih-Kuang Yeh9, Po-Hsiang Tsui10.   

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a type of hepatic steatosis that is not only associated with critical metabolic risk factors but can also result in advanced liver diseases. Ultrasound parametric imaging, which is based on statistical models, assesses fatty liver changes, using quantitative visualization of hepatic-steatosis-caused variations in the statistical properties of backscattered signals. One constraint with using statistical models in ultrasound imaging is that ultrasound data must conform to the distribution employed. Small-window entropy imaging was recently proposed as a non-model-based parametric imaging technique with physical meanings of backscattered statistics. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using small-window entropy imaging in the assessment of fatty liver disease and evaluated its performance through comparisons with parametric imaging based on the Nakagami distribution model (currently the most frequently used statistical model). Liver donors (n = 53) and patients (n = 142) were recruited to evaluate hepatic fat fractions (HFFs), using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and to evaluate the stages of fatty liver disease (normal, mild, moderate and severe), using liver biopsy with histopathology. Livers were scanned using a 3-MHz ultrasound to construct B-mode, small-window entropy and Nakagami images to correlate with HFF analyses and fatty liver stages. The diagnostic values of the imaging methods were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The results demonstrated that the entropy value obtained using small-window entropy imaging correlated well with log10(HFF), with a correlation coefficient r = 0.74, which was higher than those obtained for the B-scan and Nakagami images. Moreover, small-window entropy imaging also resulted in the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.80 for stages equal to or more severe than mild; 0.90 for equal to or more severe than moderate; 0.89 for severe), which indicated that non-model-based entropy imaging-using the small-window technique-performs more favorably than other techniques in fatty liver assessment.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entropy imaging; Fatty liver; Hepatic steatosis; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29622501     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  13 in total

1.  Ultrasound Sample Entropy Imaging: A New Approach for Evaluating Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis.

Authors:  Hsien-Jung Chan; Zhuhuang Zhou; Jui Fang; Dar-In Tai; Jeng-Hwei Tseng; Ming-Wei Lai; Bao-Yu Hsieh; Tadashi Yamaguchi; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis.

Authors:  Artem Kaliaev; Wilson Chavez; Jorge Soto; Fahimul Huda; Hua Xie; Man Nguyen; Vijay Shamdasani; Stephan Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Local Burr distribution estimator for speckle statistics.

Authors:  Gary R Ge; Jannick P Rolland; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Generalized formulations producing a Burr distribution of speckle statistics.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Sedigheh S Poul
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Burr, Lomax, Pareto, and Logistic Distributions from Ultrasound Speckle.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Sedigheh S Poul
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Hepatic steatosis assessment using ultrasound homodyned-K parametric imaging: the effects of estimators.

Authors:  Zhuhuang Zhou; Qiyu Zhang; Weiwei Wu; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Dar-In Tai; Jeng-Hwei Tseng; Yi-Ru Lin; Shuicai Wu; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-12

7.  Scattering Signatures of Normal versus Abnormal Livers with Support Vector Machine Classification.

Authors:  Jihye Baek; Sedigheh S Poul; Terri A Swanson; Theresa Tuthill; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Clinical Evaluation of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Severity Using Ultrasound Small-Window Entropy Imaging.

Authors:  Dong Yan; Qiang Li; Chia-Wei Lin; Jeng-Yi Shieh; Wen-Chin Weng; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.524

9.  Clinical Value of Information Entropy Compared with Deep Learning for Ultrasound Grading of Hepatic Steatosis.

Authors:  Jheng-Ru Chen; Yi-Ping Chao; Yu-Wei Tsai; Hsien-Jung Chan; Yung-Liang Wan; Dar-In Tai; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.524

10.  Characterization of limb lymphedema using the statistical analysis of ultrasound backscattering.

Authors:  Ya-Lun Lee; Yen-Ling Huang; Sung-Yu Chu; Wen-Hui Chan; Ming-Huei Cheng; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Tu-Yung Chang; Chih-Kuang Yeh; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.