Background/Aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is widespread chronic disease of the live in humans with the prevalence of 30% of the United States population.1,2 The goal of the study is to validate the performance of quantitative ultrasound algorithms in the assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with suspected NAFLD. Methods: This prospective study enrolled a total of 31 patients with clinical suspicion of NAFLD to receive liver fat measurements by quantitative ultrasound and reference MRI measurements (proton density fat-fraction, PDFF). The following ultrasound (US) parameters based on both raw ultrasound RF (Radio Frequency) data and 2D B-mode images of the liver were analyzed with subsequent correlation with MRI-PDFF: hepatorenal index, acoustic attenuation coefficient, Nakagami coefficient parameter, shear wave viscosity, shear wave dispersion and shear wave elasticity. Ultrasound parameters were also correlated with the presence of hypertension and diabetes. Results: The mean (± SD) age and body mass index of the patients were 49.03 (± 12.49) and 30.12 (± 6.15), respectively. Of the aforementioned ultrasound parameters, the hepatorenal index and acoustic attenuation coefficient showed a strong correlation with MRI-PDFF derivations of hepatic steatosis, with r-values of 0.829 and 0.765, respectively. None of the remaining US parameters showed strong correlations with PDFF. Significant differences in Nakagami parameters and acoustic attenuation coefficients were found in those patients with and without hypertension. Conclusions: Hepatorenal index and acoustic attenuation coefficient correlate well with MRI-PDFF-derived measurements of hepatic steatosis. Quantitative ultrasound is a promising tool for the diagnosis and assessment of patients with NAFLD.
Background/Aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is widespread chronic disease of the live in humans with the prevalence of 30% of the United States population.1,2 The goal of the study is to validate the performance of quantitative ultrasound algorithms in the assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with suspected NAFLD. Methods: This prospective study enrolled a total of 31 patients with clinical suspicion of NAFLD to receive liver fat measurements by quantitative ultrasound and reference MRI measurements (proton density fat-fraction, PDFF). The following ultrasound (US) parameters based on both raw ultrasound RF (Radio Frequency) data and 2D B-mode images of the liver were analyzed with subsequent correlation with MRI-PDFF: hepatorenal index, acoustic attenuation coefficient, Nakagami coefficient parameter, shear wave viscosity, shear wave dispersion and shear wave elasticity. Ultrasound parameters were also correlated with the presence of hypertension and diabetes. Results: The mean (± SD) age and body mass index of the patients were 49.03 (± 12.49) and 30.12 (± 6.15), respectively. Of the aforementioned ultrasound parameters, the hepatorenal index and acoustic attenuation coefficient showed a strong correlation with MRI-PDFF derivations of hepatic steatosis, with r-values of 0.829 and 0.765, respectively. None of the remaining US parameters showed strong correlations with PDFF. Significant differences in Nakagami parameters and acoustic attenuation coefficients were found in those patients with and without hypertension. Conclusions: Hepatorenal index and acoustic attenuation coefficient correlate well with MRI-PDFF-derived measurements of hepatic steatosis. Quantitative ultrasound is a promising tool for the diagnosis and assessment of patients with NAFLD.
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Anna Mae Diehl; Elizabeth M Brunt; Kenneth Cusi; Michael Charlton; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Kathryn R Nightingale; Ned C Rouze; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Michael H Wang; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; Mark L Palmeri Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Leon A Adams; James F Lymp; Jenny St Sauver; Schuyler O Sanderson; Keith D Lindor; Ariel Feldstein; Paul Angulo Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: D Festi; R Schiumerini; L Marzi; A R Di Biase; D Mandolesi; L Montrone; E Scaioli; G Bonato; G Marchesini-Reggiani; A Colecchia Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Richard H Marshall; Marna Eissa; Edward I Bluth; Paul M Gulotta; Nancy K Davis Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.959