Literature DB >> 31956528

Characterization of limb lymphedema using the statistical analysis of ultrasound backscattering.

Ya-Lun Lee1,2, Yen-Ling Huang1, Sung-Yu Chu1, Wen-Hui Chan1, Ming-Huei Cheng3, Ying-Hsiu Lin4, Tu-Yung Chang5, Chih-Kuang Yeh2, Po-Hsiang Tsui1,4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is a disease in which tissue swelling is caused by interstitial fluid retention in subcutaneous tissue. It is caused by a compromised lymphatic system. Lymphoscintigraphy is the current and primary modality used to assess lymphatic system dysfunction. Ultrasound elastography is a complementary tool used for evaluating the tissue stiffness of the lymphedematous limb. Tissue stiffness implies the existence of changes in tissue microstructures. However, ultrasound features related to tissue microstructures are neglected in clinical assessments of lymphedematous limbs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the lymphedematous diagnostic values of ultrasound Nakagami and entropy imaging, which are, respectively, model- and nonmodel-based backscattered statistical analysis methods for scatterer characterization.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients were recruited, and lymphoscintigraphy was used to score the patient's clinical severity of each of their limb lymphedema (0: normal; 1: partial lymphatic obstruction; and 2: total lymphatic obstruction). We performed ultrasound examinations to acquire ultrasound backscattered signals for B-mode, Nakagami, and entropy imaging. The envelope amplitude, Nakagami, and entropy values, as a function of the patients' lymphatic obstruction grades, were expressed in terms of their median and interquartile range (IQR). The values were then used in both an independent t test and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: For each increase in a patient's score from 0 to 2, the envelope amplitude values were 405.44 (IQR: 238.72-488.17), 411.52 (IQR: 298.53-644.25), and 476.37 (IQR: 348.86-648.16), respectively. The Nakagami parameters were 0.16 (IQR: 0.14-0.22), 0.26 (IQR: 0.23-0.34), and 0.24 (IQR: 0.16-0.36), respectively, and the entropy values were 4.55 (IQR: 4.41-4.66), 4.86 (IQR: 4.78-4.99), and 4.87 (IQR: 4.81-4.97), respectively. The P values between the normal control and lymphedema groups obtained from B-mode and Nakagami analysis were larger than 0.05; whereas that of entropy imaging was smaller than 0.05. The areas under the ROC curve for B-mode, Nakagami, and entropy imaging were 0.64 (sensitivity: 70%; specificity: 47.5%), 0.75 (sensitivity: 70%; specificity: 75%), and 0.94 (sensitivity: 95%; specificity: 87.5%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The current findings demonstrated the diagnostic values of ultrasound Nakagami and entropy imaging techniques. In particular, the use of non-model-based entropy imaging enables for improved performance when characterizing limb lymphedema. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphedema; Nakagami distribution; information entropy; ultrasound imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 31956528      PMCID: PMC6960425          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.10.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  20 in total

1.  Blood flow through human adipose tissue determined with radioactive xenon.

Authors:  O A Larsen; N A Lassen; F Quaade
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1966-03

Review 2.  Liposuction in Lymphedema Treatment.

Authors:  Håkan Brorson
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Validity of the Novel Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging and Correlation of Cheng Lymphedema Grading for Unilateral Extremity Lymphedema.

Authors:  Ming-Huei Cheng; Marco Pappalardo; Chieh Lin; Chang-Fu Kuo; Chia-Yu Lin; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Excess plasma proteins as a cause of chronic inflammation and lymphodema: quantitative electron microscopy.

Authors:  J R Casley-Smith; R M Gaffney
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Excess plasma proteins as a cause of chronic inflammation and lymphoedema: biochemical estimations.

Authors:  R M Gaffney; J R Casley-Smith
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography: Tissue Stiffness Measurement in Limb Lymphedema.

Authors:  Wen-Hui Chan; Yen-Ling Huang; Chieh Lin; Chia-Yu Lin; Ming-Huei Cheng; Sung-Yu Chu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Early Diagnosis of Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treatment: Bio-Impedance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ayfer Kamalı Polat; Ufuk Karabacak; Vahit Mutlu; Leman Tomak; Ayhan Bilgici
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-04-01

Review 8.  Inflammatory Manifestations of Lymphedema.

Authors:  Catherine L Ly; Raghu P Kataru; Babak J Mehrara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Small-window parametric imaging based on information entropy for ultrasound tissue characterization.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Chin-Kuo Chen; Wen-Hung Kuo; King-Jen Chang; Jui Fang; Hsiang-Yang Ma; Dean Chou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of ultrasound frequency on the Nakagami statistics of human liver tissues.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Zhuhuang Zhou; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Chieh-Ming Hung; Shih-Jou Chung; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Skin Layer Thickness and Shear Wave Elastography Changes Induced by Intensive Decongestive Treatment of Lower Limb Lymphedema.

Authors:  Merriem Zarrad; Claire Duflos; Gregory Marin; Murielle Benhamou; Jean-Pierre Laroche; Michel Dauzat; Isabelle Quéré; Sandrine Mestre-Godin
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.589

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.