| Literature DB >> 29621987 |
Takashi Hirai1,2, Toshitaka Yoshii3,4, Narihito Nagoshi5, Kazuhiro Takeuchi6,4, Kanji Mori7,4, Shuta Ushio3,4, Akio Iwanami5, Tsuyoshi Yamada3,4, Shoji Seki8,4, Takashi Tsuji9,4, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi10,4, Mitsuru Furukawa11,4, Soraya Nishimura5,12,4, Kanichiro Wada13,4, Takeo Furuya14,4, Yukihiro Matsuyama15,4, Tomohiko Hasegawa15,4, Katsushi Takeshita16,4, Atsushi Kimura16,4, Masahiko Abematsu17,4, Hirotaka Haro18,4, Tetsuro Ohba18,4, Masahiko Watanabe19,4, Hiroyuki Katoh19,4, Kei Watanabe20,4, Hiroshi Ozawa21,4, Haruo Kanno22,4, Shiro Imagama23,4, Kei Ando23,4, Shunsuke Fujibayashi24,4, Masao Koda25,4, Masashi Yamazaki25,4, Morio Matsumoto5, Masaya Nakamura5, Atsushi Okawa3,4, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi8,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the cervical spine, it is well known that the thoracic ossified lesions often coexist with the cervical lesions and can cause severe myelopathy. However, the prevalence of OPLL at each level of the thoracic and lumbar spinal segments is unknown. The aims of this study were to investigate how often OPLL occurs at each level in the thoracolumbar spine in patients with a radiological diagnosis of cervical OPLL and to identify the spinal levels most likely to develop ossification.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; OPLL; Ossification predisposition; Prevalence; Whole spine
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29621987 PMCID: PMC5887213 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2009-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Patient flow diagram
Demographics of male and female patients
| Male + Female ( | Male ( | Female ( | P (M vs F) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 64.7 ± 11.2 | 64.7 ± 11.6 | 64.6 ± 10.0 | 0.90 |
| Diabetes Mellitus (%) | 31.7% | 31.8% | 31.3% | 0.92 |
| BMI | 25.7 ± 4.8 | 25.8 ± 4.8 | 25.5 ± 4.7 | 0.62 |
| JOSL CT classification | ||||
| Grade 1 (1 < cervical OP-index≤5) | 169 (52.5%) | 125 (51.7%) | 44 (55%) | – |
| Grade 2 (6 < cervical OP-index ≤9) | 107 (33.2%) | 83 (34.3%) | 24 (30%) | – |
| Grade 3 (10 < cervical OP-index) | 46 (14.3%) | 34 (14.0%) | 12 (15%) | – |
| Cervical OP-index | 5.83 ± 2.9 | 5.86 ± 2.9 | 5.75 ± 3.0 | 0.78 |
| OP-index | 9.21 ± 6.8 | 8.24 ± 5.5 | 12.1 ± 9.0 | < 0.01 |
| No. of patients with OP-index of > = 20 (%) | 27 (8.3%) | 11 (4.5%) | 16 (20%) | < 0.01 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; BMI body mass index, OP-index ossification index of OPLL
Incidence of ossified lesion in each level
low more significant different (0.01 < p < 0.05)
moderate more significant different (0.001 < p < 0.01)
high more significant different (p < 0.001)
Fig. 2Hazard ratios for the prevalence of ossified lesions at each spinal level in patients with severe OPLL compared with patients with OPLL of any grade. OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Hazard ratio of the incidence of ossified lesion at each level in patients with OP-index ≧20 compared to total patients
| Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | Folds change | p | Folds change | p |
| T1 | 4.9 | 0 | 2.7 | 0.0008 |
| T1–2 | 6.0 | 0 | 2.3 | 0.0079 |
| T2 | 6.9 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.0023 |
| T2–3 | 7.6 | 0 | 2.7 | 0.0004 |
| T3 | 12.0 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.0012 |
| T3–4 | 6.6 | 0 | 2.4 | 0.0012 |
| T4 | 11.0 | 0 | 3.0 | 0.0044 |
| T4–5 | 5.5 | 0 | 3.1 | 0 |
| T5 | – | 0.1224 | 2.9 | 0.0023 |
| T5–6 | 3.9 | 0.005 | 2.8 | 0.0001 |
| T6 | 8.8 | 0.0246 | 3.0 | 0.0044 |
| T6–7 | – | 0.0505 | 3.0 | 0.0003 |
| T7 | 7.3 | 0.0424 | 2.5 | 0.0469 |
| T7–8 | 5.5 | 0.0001 | 2.5 | 0.0039 |
| T8 | 8.8 | 0.0246 | – | 0.0794 |
| T8–9 | 4.2 | 0.0127 | 2.8 | 0.0068 |
| T9 | 11.0 | 0.0121 | 3.2 | 0.0141 |
| T9–10 | 4.0 | 0.0161 | 3.0 | 0.0044 |
| T10 | – | 0.628 | – | 0.2477 |
| T10–11 | – | 0.3488 | 2.7 | 0.0327 |
| T11 | 11.0 | 0.0121 | – | 0.455 |
| T11–12 | 6.3 | 0 | – | 0.0871 |
| T12 | 12.6 | 0 | 4.2 | 0.0219 |
| T12-L1 | 3.8 | 0.0019 | 3.0 | 0.0001 |
| L1 | 7.9 | 0 | 3.3 | 0.0237 |
| L1–2 | 5.0 | 0 | 2.7 | 0.0186 |
| L2 | 9.2 | 0 | 3.3 | 0.0237 |
| L2–3 | 5.1 | 0.0001 | 2.5 | 0.0148 |
| L3 | 11.0 | 0.0121 | – | 0.1003 |
| L3–4 | 5.5 | 0.0159 | – | 0.3594 |
| L4 | – | 0.1505 | – | 0.2534 |
| L4–5 | – | 0.4713 | – | 0.1779 |
| L5 | – | 0.2926 | – | 0.4113 |
| L5-S1 | 4.2 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.0081 |
| S1 | – | 0.1505 | – | – |
Incidence of ossified lesion in each level according to cervical OP-index grading system
low more significant different (0.01 < p < 0.05)
moderate more significant different (0.001 < p < 0.01)
high more significant different (p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Logistic regression model showing a significant correlation between cervical OP index grade and prevalence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament at different thoracic and lumbar spinal levels
Increased risk of OPLL in each level according to cervical OP-index grading system
| Grade 1+ | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | Odds ratio | p | Odds ratio | p |
| T1 | 5.0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0 |
| T1–2 | 3.2 | 0 | 3.5 | 0.001 |
| T2 | 4.3 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.003 |
| T2–3 | 2.5 | 0.001 | 3.1 | 0.002 |
| T3 | 3.3 | 0.005 | 3.7 | 0.001 |
| T3–4 | 2.1 | 0.004 | 2.6 | 0.006 |
| T4 | – | 0.07 | 2.3 | 0.027 |
| T4–5 | – | 0.133 | 4.3 | 0 |
| T5 | – | 0.12 | – | 0.111 |
| T5–6 | – | 0.24 | 2.4 | 0.01 |
| T6 | 6.5 | 0.013 | 2.3 | 0.034 |
| T6–7 | – | 0.084 | 2.0 | 0.045 |
| T7 | – | 0.077 | – | 0.169 |
| T7–8 | – | 0.089 | – | 0.075 |
| T8 | – | 0.09 | – | 0.123 |
| T8–9 | – | 0.078 | 3.1 | 0.003 |
| T9 | – | 0.104 | – | 0.312 |
| T9–10 | – | 0.359 | 2.3 | 0.027 |
| T10 | – | 0.25 | – | 0.234 |
| T10–11 | – | 0.628 | 2.2 | 0.043 |
| T11 | 5.0 | 0.036 | – | 0.153 |
| T11–12 | 2.7 | 0.001 | 3.1 | 0.003 |
| T12 | 3.3 | 0.023 | 3.7 | 0.024 |
| T12-L1 | 2.0 | 0.007 | 3.4 | 0.001 |
| L1 | 2.3 | 0.021 | – | 0.101 |
| L1–2 | 2.3 | 0.006 | – | 0.08 |
| L2 | – | 0.07 | – | 0.465 |
| L2–3 | 2.7 | 0 | 2.1 | 0.041 |
| L3 | 5.0 | 0.036 | – | 0.189 |
| L3–4 | – | 0.07 | – | 0.763 |
| L4 | – | 0.993 | – | 0.46 |
| L4–5 | – | 0.449 | – | 0.381 |
| L5 | – | 0.47 | – | 0.118 |
| L5-S1 | – | 0.24 | – | 0.312 |
| S1 | 5.0 | 0.993 | – | – |