| Literature DB >> 35806979 |
Takashi Hirai1, Toshitaka Yoshii1, Jun Hashimoto1, Shuta Ushio1, Kanji Mori2, Satoshi Maki3, Keiichi Katsumi4, Narihito Nagoshi5, Kazuhiro Takeuchi6, Takeo Furuya3, Kei Watanabe4, Norihiro Nishida7, Soraya Nishimura5, Kota Watanabe5, Takashi Kaito8, Satoshi Kato9, Katsuya Nagashima10, Masao Koda10, Hiroaki Nakashima11, Shiro Imagama11, Kazuma Murata12, Yuji Matsuoka12, Kanichiro Wada13, Atsushi Kimura14, Tetsuro Ohba15, Hiroyuki Katoh16, Masahiko Watanabe16, Yukihiro Matsuyama17, Hiroshi Ozawa18, Hirotaka Haro15, Katsushi Takeshita14, Morio Matsumoto5, Masaya Nakamura5, Satoru Egawa1, Yu Matsukura1, Hiroyuki Inose1, Atsushi Okawa1, Masashi Yamazaki10, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical features of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and extreme ossification at multiple sites.Entities:
Keywords: OP index; ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; pain; patient-reported outcomes; prospective multi-institutional study
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806979 PMCID: PMC9267168 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament according to whether they had a high or moderate/low OP index.
| High OP Index ( | Moderate/Low OP Index ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.0 ± 14.0 | 64.5 ± 12.0 | 0.07 |
| Male sex (%) | 32.0 | 73.5 | <0.001 *** |
| Body mass index | 27.4 ± 5.8 | 25.7 ± 4.3 | 0.17 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 28.0 | 24.6 | 0.82 |
| Cervical JOA score | 11.5 (6–17) | 12.4 (−2, 17) | 0.12 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association. *** p < 0.001.
Clinical characteristics in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament according to whether the OP index was high or moderate/low.
| High OP Index ( | Moderate/Low OP Index ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of symptoms (%) | |||
| Neck pain | 60.0 | 60.2 | 0.98 |
| Back pain | 32.0 | 28.0 | 0.67 |
| Low back pain | 68.0 | 52.6 | 0.14 |
| JOA-CMEQ score | |||
| Cervical spine function | 59.8 ± 33.8 | 66.6 ± 27.9 | 0.34 |
| Upper extremity function | 74.5 ± 21.6 | 80.8 ± 21.5 | 0.18 |
| Lower extremity function | 46.1 ± 35.7 | 68.3 ± 29.3 | 0.006 ** |
| Bladder function | 73.0 ± 20.2 | 74.7 ± 22.3 | 0.69 |
| Quality of life | 40.4 ± 20.2 | 51.0 ± 19.6 | 0.02 * |
| JOA-BPEQ score | |||
| Lumbar spine function | 54.0 ± 29.3 | 69.7 ± 31.6 | 0.02 * |
| Social dysfunction | 43.4 ± 32.8 | 57.9 ± 28.7 | 0.04 * |
| Mentality | 40.8 ± 18.6 | 50.1 ± 19.9 | 0.03 * |
| Locomotive function | 45.6 ± 37.1 | 66.4 ± 34.5 | 0.01 * |
| Body pain | 58.2 ± 39.1 | 72.3 ± 32.7 | 0.09 |
| VAS score | |||
| Neck pain | 40.2 ± 31.3 | 38.6 ± 31.2 | 0.81 |
| Upper extremity numbness | 47.5 ± 34.5 | 44.8 ± 33.2 | 0.71 |
| Chest constriction | 13.0 ± 27.9 | 9.9 ± 21.0 | 0.60 |
| Numbness below the chest | 60.1 ± 28.9 | 34.2 ± 33.6 | <0.001 *** |
| Low back pain | 44.1 ± 32.9 | 25.7 ± 27.9 | 0.01 * |
| Lower extremity numbness | 54.4 ± 34.9 | 28.1 ± 32.6 | <0.01 ** |
| Lower extremity pain | 37.8 ± 33.6 | 21.4 ± 29.4 | 0.03 * |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. BPEQ, Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; CMEQ, Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; VAS, visual analog scale. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1The distribution of OP index values.
Figure 2Radiologic findings, including OPLL (A), OALL (B), OLF (C), SSL or nuchal ligament (D), and DISH (E) in the high OP-index group and moderate/low OP-index group. DISH, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis; OALL, ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament; OLF, ossification of the ligamentum flavum; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; SSL, supra- and interspinous ligaments * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
CNR grade according to high or moderate/low OP index values.
| CNR Grade | High OP Index ( | Moderate/Low OP Index ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 2 (8%) | 70 (33.2%) | |
| 2 | 8 (32%) | 71 (33.6%) | |
| 3 | 12 (48%) | 56 (26.5%) | |
| 4 | 3 (12%) | 14 (6.6%) | |
| 0.03 * |
CNR, canal narrowing ratio. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3The distribution of OPLL and DISH in men and women in the high OP index group. DISH, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.