| Literature DB >> 29621187 |
Edith P Karuna1, Shannon S Choi2, Michael K Scales3, Jennie Hum4, Michael Cohen5, Fernando A Fierro6, Hsin-Yi Henry Ho7.
Abstract
Noncanonical WNT pathways function independently of the β-catenin transcriptional co-activator to regulate diverse morphogenetic and pathogenic processes. Recent studies showed that noncanonical WNTs, such as WNT5A, can signal the degradation of several downstream effectors, thereby modulating these effectors' cellular activities. The protein domain(s) that mediates the WNT5A-dependent degradation response, however, has not been identified. By coupling protein mutagenesis experiments with a flow cytometry-based degradation reporter assay, we have defined a protein domain in the kinesin superfamily protein KIF26B that is essential for WNT5A-dependent degradation. We found that a human disease-causing KIF26B mutation located at a conserved amino acid within this domain compromises the ability of WNT5A to induce KIF26B degradation. Using pharmacological perturbation, we further uncovered a role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in WNT5A regulation of KIF26B degradation. Lastly, based on the identification of the WNT5A-responsive domain, we developed a new reporter system that allows for efficient profiling of WNT5A-KIF26B signaling activity in both somatic and stem cells. In conclusion, our study identifies a new protein domain that mediates WNT5A-dependent degradation of KIF26B and provides a new tool for functional characterization of noncanonical WNT5A signaling in cells.Entities:
Keywords: Dishevelled; Frizzled receptors; GSK3; KIF26B; ROR receptors; WNT5A; mesenchymal stem cells; protein degradation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29621187 PMCID: PMC5924538 DOI: 10.3390/genes9040196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
List of primers used to generate mutant variants of KIF26B and KIF26A.
| Mutant Name | Forward/Reverse | Primer Sequence (5′→3′) |
|---|---|---|
| KIF26B-Delta N | F | gatcggccggcctaccatgcggaagaagcagatcacc |
| KIF26B-Delta N | R | gatcggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-Delta M | F | gatcggccggcctaccatgaagaccaagtacacatcaa |
| KIF26B-Delta M | R | gatcggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-Delta C | F | gatcggccggcctaccatgaattcggtagccggaaataaag |
| KIF26B-Delta C | R | gatcggcgcgccttacttgctcactgcagagatctt |
| KIF26B-C | F | gatcggccggcctaccatgtctaagatctctgcagtga |
| KIF26B-C | R | gatcggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-C1 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccatgtctaagatctctg |
| KIF26B-C1 | R | tatagttctagaggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-C2 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccatgtctaagatctctg |
| KIF26B-C2 | R | tatagttctagaggcgcgccttagccgtccacccagcggac |
| KIF26B-C3 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccaagcccgcagccgcccac |
| KIF26B-C3 | R | tatagttctagaggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-C4 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctacccgctgggtggacggc |
| KIF26B-C4 | R | tatagttctagaggcgcgccttatcggcgcctggaggtgatgtc |
| KIF26B-C5 | F | gccggaaccaattcagtcgacaccatgccctcgccctacagcaag |
| KIF26B-C5 | R | ccttgctcaccatggttgtggcgcctcggcgcctggaggtgatg |
| KIF26B-C6 | F | gccggaaccaattcagtcgacaccatgacccctccgaggaagccg |
| KIF26B-C6 | R | ccttgctcaccatggttgtggcgcctcggcgcctggaggtgatg |
| KIF26B-C7 | F | gccggaaccaattcagtcgacaccatgagcagcgggcacggtagt |
| KIF26B-C7 | R | ccttgctcaccatggttgtggcgcctcggcgcctggaggtgatg |
| KIF26B-C8 | F | gccggaaccaattcagtcgacaccatgctaccacctgccatggg |
| KIF26B-C8 | R | ccttgctcaccatggttgtggcgcctcggcgcctggaggtgatg |
| KIF26B-C9 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccaagcccgcagccgcccac |
| KIF26B-C9 | R | gatcggcgcgccttacaagcgctctgtcacacc |
| KIF26B-C10 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccaagcccgcagccgcccac |
| KIF26B-C10 | R | gatcggcgcgccttacaggtactgcttggtcgc |
| KIF26B-C11 | F | gacttgaattcaggccggcctaccaagcccgcagccgcccac |
| KIF26B-C11 | R | gatcggcgcgccttatcgacgtcgctgcaggcg |
| KIF26B-C (D1904N) | F | ggctacgagagcatgatgagaaacagcgaggccaccggcagtg |
| KIF26B-C (D1904N) | R | cactgccggtggcctcgctgtttctcatcatgctctcgtagcc |
| KIF26A-C | F | gatcggccggcctaccatgagcccagccaagggtgttggag |
| KIF26A-C | R | gatcggcgcgcctcaaacatccacctcttgtggccc |
Figure 1The C-terminus of KIF26B is sufficient and required for WNT5A-dependent degradation. (a) Truncation analysis of KIF26B degradation activity in full length KIF26B (FL) and combinations of N-terminal (N), motor-like (M) and C-terminal (C) domains. Each truncated construct was fused to GFP, stably transfected into NIH/3T3 cells and tested for its ability to undergo degradation after WNT5A stimulation (200 ng/mL WNT5A for 6 h) of the reporter cells; (b) Quantification of reporter activity for each truncation variant shown in (a). Error bars represent ± standard error of the mean (SEM) calculated from three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant; ** p value < 0.01; *** p value < 0.001 vs. GFP-FL); (c) Flow cytometry histograms depicting that GFP-KIF26A-C undergoes WNT5A-dependent degradation with an activity comparable to that of GFP-KIF26B-C and GFP-full-length KIF26B (a.u. = arbitrary units).
Figure 2The WNT5A-responsive degradation (WRD) domain of KIF26B is physiologically significant. (a) Truncation and mapping analysis of the KIF26B C-terminus. GFP was fused to either the N-terminus (C1–C4, C9–C11) or C-terminus (C5–C8) of each truncation variant and the constructs were analyzed as in Figure 1a. CC, coiled coil; (b) Quantification of reporter activity for truncation variants C1–C4 as shown in (a). Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant; *** p value < 0.001 vs. GFP-C); (c) Quantification of reporter activity for fine truncation variants C5–C11 as shown in (a). Within this set, GFP was fused to either the N-terminus (C9–C11) or C-terminus (C5–C8) depending on the direction of truncation. We avoided fusing GFP to the end that was being truncated and tested to prevent potential steric hindrance by the GFP tag. Column labels are intended to reflect the position of the GFP tag in each construct. Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (*** p value < 0.001 vs. GFP-C); (d) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the effect of D1904N point mutation on WNT5A-dependent KIF26B-C degradation (a.u. = arbitrary units); (e) Quantification of (d). Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from independent replicates (GFP-WT-C, n = 16; GFP-D1904N-C, n = 23). Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (*** p value < 0.001 vs. GFP-WT-C).
Figure 3Functional characterization of KIF26B-C in the degradation reporter assay. (a) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the effect of ectopic FZD1 and FZD7 expression on GFP-KIF26B-C degradation (a.u. = arbitrary units); (b) Quantification of (a) (a.u. = arbitrary units). Median fluorescence is used for quantification because the experiment involved direct comparison of different cell lines, unlike the experiments presented in previous figures where % degradation was used to specifically express the effects of WNT5A stimulation within the same cell lines. Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from three independent replicates of each experimental condition. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant; *** p value < 0.001 vs. no virus); (c) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the effect of ectopic SHISA2 expression on GFP-KIF26B-C degradation (a.u. = arbitrary units). Control buffer traces for “Control virus” and “SHISA2 virus” lines are similar to that of the “No virus” and thus not shown for visual clarity. However, data from the respective buffer control experiment for each virus-infected line were used for the quantification shown in (d); (d) Quantification of (c). Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from three independent replicates of each experimental condition. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant; *** p value < 0.001 vs. no virus, +WNT5A); (e) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the effect of ectopic DVL1 expression on GFP-KIF26B-C degradation (a.u. = arbitrary units); (f) Quantification of (e) (a.u. = arbitrary units). Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from three independent replicates of each experimental condition. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (*** p value < 0.001 vs. control virus).
Figure 4Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is part of the WNT5A signaling cascade that controls KIF26B-C degradation. (a) Dose-response curves showing WNT5A-induced GFP-KIF26B-C (C) degradation as a function of CHIR99021 (GSK3 inhibitor) concentration, without or with SHISA2 expression in the reporter cells. Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from independent replicates (n = 3 for each experimental condition); (b) Top: Median fluorescence vs. CHIR99021 concentration for GFP-KIF26B-C (baseline fluorescence) and GFP-KIF26B-C fluorescence resulting from DVL1-induced degradation (a.u. = arbitrary units). Bottom: quantification of the percent difference between DVL1-induced fluorescence and baseline medians for each concentration. Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from independent replicates (n = 6 for each experimental condition). For the quantification, statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant vs. 0 nM); (c) Model of the role of GSK3 in FZD-ROR receptor dynamics.
Figure 5KIF26B-C as a functional reporter for profiling WNT5A signaling activity in somatic and stem cell lines. (a) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the degradation response of the lentiviral GFP-KIF26B-C reporter in NIH/3T3 cells after WNT5A stimulation (a.u. = arbitrary units); (b) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the degradation response of the lentiviral GFP-KIF26B-C reporter in P19 cells after WNT5A stimulation. Dotted trace indicates the autofluorescence of the control, uninfected cells (a.u. = arbitrary units); (c) Flow cytometry histograms depicting the degradation response of the lentiviral GFP-KIF26B-C reporter in three independent lines of primary human MSCs after WNT5A stimulation. Dotted trace indicates the autofluorescence of the control, uninfected cells (a.u. = arbitrary units); (d) Quantification of (a–c) (a.u. = arbitrary units). Error bars represent ± SEM calculated from independent replicates (n = 3 for NIH/3T3, P19; n = 4 for MSC 1, 2 and 3). Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test (n.s. = not significant; *** p value < 0.001; ** p value < 0.01).