Literature DB >> 33754320

Sharper attentional tuning with target templates in long-term compared to working memory.

Suk Won Han1, Yoonki Min2, Koeun Jung3.   

Abstract

Theories of attention postulate the existence of an attentional template containing target features in working or long-term memory. Previous research has shown that these internal representations of target features in memory are shifted away from nontarget features and that attention is tuned to the shifted feature especially when the target appeared with similar nontarget items. While previous studies have shown that the target-nontarget relationship has influence on the attentional selection and the representation shift when attentional template is maintained in long-term memory, there is little evidence for such effects when attentional template is stored in working memory. To address this issue, we asked participants to search for a target, which varied from trial to trial (working memory attentional template), or look for the target being stable across trials (long-term memory attentional template). We found that the shifted target features captured attention and that the representations of target features were deviated away from nontarget features when the target template was stored in either working memory or long-term memory. However, such effects were found to be greater for the attentional template in long-term memory. The present results provide evidence that one can encode the target-nontarget relationship even though the target varies from trial to trial, and such contextual information influences attentional selection and target representation shift even under this dynamically changing environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional template; Optimal tuning; Relational search; Working memory

Year:  2021        PMID: 33754320     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01898-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The role of relational information in contingent capture.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-04

4.  The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: an object-updating account.

Authors:  Tomer Carmel; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Anthony M Harris; Ashley York; Jessica Choi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; E K Miller; J Duncan; R Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Jason T Arita; Deborah Pardo; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.