Literature DB >> 33553707

Anomalous behaviour of ozone under COVID-19 and explicit diagnosis of O3-NOx-VOCs mechanism.

A Rathod1, S K Sahu2, S Singh3, G Beig1.   

Abstract

Air pollution is linked to higher rates of human mortality especially those infected with COVID 19. Ozone is a harmful pollutant and is responsible for many health issues. However, some reports suggest that ozone is a strong disinfectant, and can kill the viruses. We hereby, report on the vulnerability of ozone due to COVID-19 lockdown whose levels flutter from surging to saturation in a highly polluted Indian capital, due to significant decline in anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursors. Average observed levels stabilized at 30 ppb, 12 ppb, 740 ppb, and 900 ppb for ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) respectively during lockdown period from 27th March to 10th April 2020. The NO2, CO and VOC declined by 50 %, 37 %, 38 % respectively during the lockdown period of 2020 as compared to similar period in 2019. The anomalous response of ozone during the lockdown is explained by resolving the poorly known complex O3-NOx-VOCs mechanism with the help of data from air monitoring stations in Delhi, India. The data obtained from this study advances the fundamental understanding of ozone chemistry that may lead to improved ozone parameterization in chemical transport models and better planning of ozone risk management strategies for any global mega cities.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic; COVID-19; NOx; O3; Ozone; Pollutant

Year:  2021        PMID: 33553707      PMCID: PMC7846224          DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heliyon        ISSN: 2405-8440


Introduction

COrona VIrus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic is the greatest challenge that confronts humanity since World War-II [1]. As of October 2020, the virus has infected around 39 million people globally and has an infection fatality ratio of 2.79% [2]. According to the study at Harvard University, long term exposure to fine particulate matter such as PM2.5 aggravates the adverse health effects from COVID-19 infections [3]. Economically, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in industrial production, revenue by air couriers and the tourism industry [4]. Global manufacturing sector industries such as automobile, food, metal, electronics etc. suffered a decrease in FDI (Foreign Direct Investment). As estimated by United Nations Conference on Trade And Development (UNCTAD) manufacturing sector FDI has decreased by 5–15 % due to pandemic coupled with shutdown [5]. Travel restrictions imposed by government resulted in loss of $200 billion globally and a loss of around $113 billion by the airlines has been forecasted by The International Air Transportation Association (IATA) [6, 7]. COVID-19 lockdown led to a decline in mean concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) by 28 %, 57 % 46 %, 50 % and 62 % in Beijing, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Barcelona and Madrid respectively [8, 9]. In São Paulo, Brazil, 13 stations reported 34 %–68 % reduction in NOx levels when compared with business as usual weekdays prior to lockdown [10]. Observations reveal a drastic drop in gaseous pollutants and particle pollution over major cities of the world like Delhi, London, Los Angeles, Milan, Mumbai, New York, Rome, São Paulo, Seoul and Wuhan, ranging between −9 % and −60 % compared to 2019 data, and between +2 % and −55 % compared with the prior four-year average [11, 12]. COVID-19 related reduction in NO2 was up to 30 % as compared to pre-lockdown period based on satellite data released by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) over areas of Europe, China and North America. Breathing ozone can trigger many health conditions, such as chest pain, coughing, throat irritation, and airway inflammation in humans [13]. It can also reduce lung function and harm lung tissues, symptoms almost similar to COVID-19 ailment [14]. However, a contemporary school of thought advocates that ozone effectively destroys bacteria and viruses, due to its disinfectant and oxidizing properties [15]. Thus, an increase in ozone concentration in the atmosphere may assist to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infections among the human population [16]. Current study, reports on the level of ozone in the atmosphere during the lockdown in Delhi, India. Ozone pollution has also been studied from radical chemistry to O3-VOC-NOx sensitivity in Chengdu, south-western China [17]. Ambient ozone trends at urban, suburban, and rural monitoring sites across the United States over a period of decreasing NOx and VOC emissions (1998–2013) has also been reported earlier [18]. Studies on NOx and VOCs, a major component of O3 has been reported earlier from photochemical air quality models [19, 20]. However, studies indicate that high uncertainties are associated with the input parameters used to develop the photochemical models. Subsequently, leading to poor estimation of O3, VOCs and NOx levels in the atmosphere. The split between NOx-sensitive and VOC-sensitive chemistry is a major source of uncertainty in most forecasting models. NOx-VOC sensitivity is difficult to predict, and there are no straight forward explanation for distinguishing NOx-sensitive from VOC-sensitive conditions. The COVID-19 lockdown period (23rd March 2020–10th April 2020) offers a unique opportunity to understand the distribution pattern of O3, VOCs and NOx in the atmosphere over Delhi, India. In addition, this study highlights O3 production and the sensitivity to NOx, CO and VOCs based on data obtained from air monitoring stations in Delhi, India. In this study, we have represented methane and non-methane hydrocarbons as VOCs (includes variety of chemically different compounds such as benzene, ethanol, etc.) whose levels are measured collectively by the analyser is adopted in this work. This work is carried under System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research (SAFAR), a research project of Ministry of Earth Science, Government of India which is also recognized as pilot study of World Meteorological Organization (WMO) [21] established in Indian capital city Delhi (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Location of Mega city Delhi in India. The standard emission (Gg/Yr) of ozone precursors, namely NOx, CO and VOCs from six broad categories of sources in Delhi region and their relative share is depicted by different colors by the horizontal panel in the right side of maps. The downward arrows indicate the total reduction (%) in the magnitude of the emissions of these pollutants under COVID-19 lockdown scenario. The lower horizontal panel depicts the reduced magnitude of emissions for lockdown scenario. The total emissions (Gg/Yr) in standard as well as lockdown scenario of each pollutant are written in extreme left side of top panel.

Location of Mega city Delhi in India. The standard emission (Gg/Yr) of ozone precursors, namely NOx, CO and VOCs from six broad categories of sources in Delhi region and their relative share is depicted by different colors by the horizontal panel in the right side of maps. The downward arrows indicate the total reduction (%) in the magnitude of the emissions of these pollutants under COVID-19 lockdown scenario. The lower horizontal panel depicts the reduced magnitude of emissions for lockdown scenario. The total emissions (Gg/Yr) in standard as well as lockdown scenario of each pollutant are written in extreme left side of top panel.

Experimental design and methodology

This study is focused on Indian capital Delhi as shown in Figure 1. Delhi is a highly urbanized landlocked city and with an elevation of 216 m above sea level. The city covers an area of 1483 sq km and has a population of about 17 million [22]. It is over populated and has many establishments compared to other major cities in India. The study design is based on the data obtained from the project SAFAR, which consists of 8–10 Air Quality Monitoring Stations (AQMS) in Delhi, India. The air monitoring analyzers such as O3, NOx, CO, and VOCs at the 10 stations are approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and certified by Bureau Veritas Certification (ISO9001) for quality control. The micro environments considered under this study are viz. downtown area, background, industrialized area, residential area, traffic areas etc. of Delhi and the average concentration of pollutant is considered to be representative of the city as per WMO guidelines [21]. The data is time resolved and have frequency of 5 min and then binned for one-hour interval for further analysis. The NOx analyser (Model 42i, Thermo Fisher Scientific, US), works on the principle of chemiluminescence and measures nitric oxide and total oxides of nitrogen concentration within the gaseous sample. The CO was measured using Non-Dispersive Infra-Red detectors using Gas Filter Correlation Carbon Monoxide Analyser (Model: 48i, Thermo Fisher Scientific, US). Ozone is monitored by Ozone analyser (Model: 49i, Thermo Fisher Scientific, US) which uses mercury vapor lamp as light source that emits wavelength of 254nm. Ozone concentration is determined by the UV light absorbed by the air sample. Flame ionization detector was used to determine Methane/Non-Methane hydrocarbons by using Model: HC51M-LCD (Environment SA, France). The instruments were calibrated and maintained according to the US EPA standard operating procedure [21]. Further detailed information about calibration procedure can be found by referring to title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 50 [23].

Emission inventory

The pollution level in a city is largely dependent on the sources of emissions [21, 24, 25]. The sources of NOx, CO and VOC emissions are classified in 6 different categories by SAFAR over Delhi [24, 25]. These are fossil fuel (vehicular transport), bio-fuel (residential combustion), industry, power, windblown dust (re-suspended dust) and rest others (like brick kiln, open trash burning and solid waste). These sources have been found as potential sources for the emissions into the atmosphere in Delhi [24]. The relative distribution of various sources of emissions for NOx CO and VOCs are shown in Figure 1. The emission inventory of ozone precursors for the lockdown scenario is constructed based on the combination of standard emissions of Delhi [24] and the local field survey report on activity data during the lockdown period. Building an inventory for air pollutants is a challenging task as it requires qualitative and quantitative data and source apportionment of various sources of emission. The emission inventory used in this work is based on the latest report released by Indian government [24] for Delhi, which is based on the bottom up approach, and a Geographical Information System (GIS) based statistical model [25]. The bottom up approach consists of repository of activity data from various sources on a finer resolution and the information about emission factors. Emissions from various sources have been classified broadly in six sectors namely transport, bio-fuel, power, industrial, re-suspended dust and others (like brick kiln, open trash burning and solid waste). Development of such complex inventory, involves the recognition of each source and distribution of emission geographically. The estimations are based on primary and secondary activity data collected at grid level. The total emission is expressed by following equations for all pollutants:-Where, a, b, c = sector, fuel type, technology TE = Total Emission FU = Sector and fuel specific amount EF = Emission Factors (Technology specific) U= Fraction of fuel for a sector with particular technology, where for each fuel and sector. Specific vehicular emission factors for transport sector for India are developed by Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI). The emission from transport sector has been calculated as per the equation below:Where, Et = Total Emission of compound Veh = Number of Vehicle per type D = Distance travelled in a year per different vehicle type EF, km = emission of compound, vehicle type per driven kilometre In the present work, the reduction in emission in various sectors has been done as per the local statistics for each species NOx, CO and VOCs as shown in Figure 1.

Results

Figure 2 shows the time series of NO2, CO and VOC and O3 for the period 20th February 2020 to 10th April 2020, covering 3 regimes- (a) Normal: Business as usual scenario during Feb 20 to 5th March; (b) Partial Lockdown Scenario: Fear and panic escalated due to COVID-19 related deaths in India led to partial lockdown voluntary and due to government induced selected restrictions during the period 5th March till about 23rd March; (c) Full Lockdown: It is considered from 23rd March 2020 onwards. The data of 2020 is compared with the data of identical period of 2019 in Figure 2. We compared data obtained during the full lockdown period between 2019 and 2020 for Figure 2. The levels of all pollutants declined significantly except ozone immediately after the lockdown period of 2020 imposed, as evident from Figure 2. The distribution of these parameters in 2019 continues to follow the normal pattern and do not show any visible declining trend. Table 1 shown in volume mixing ratio of O3, NO2, CO and VOCs averaged over the full lockdown period for 2020 and 2019. The statistical error associated with observational data is also shown. The percentage reduction of these pollutants in 2020 with respect to 2019 is also provided. There was a decline of 25 %, 50 %, 37 % and 38 %, in concentration of O3, NO2, CO and VOCs respectively. During this lockdown period of 2020, as per the survey and statistics of internal reports, transport activities almost came to a halt and only essential duty and supply vehicles were on road. Similarly rest of other sectors (like brick Kiln, solid waste, open trash burning, etc) were affected except bio-fuel emissions in fringe areas of Delhi where people use coal and wood for residential cooking [24]. Lockdown resulted in reduction of emission of ozone precursors by ~85–90 % as discussed in the previous section. The reduced emission scenario is provided in Figure 1 for NOx, CO and VOCs (see Table 2).
Figure 2

Time series of (a) NO2, (b) CO, (c) VOCs and (d) O3 for period 20th February to 10th April 2020 compared with identical period data of 2019.

Table 1

Average concentration of O3, CO, VOC's and NO2 during the full lockdown period (23 March to 10th April) of 2020 compared with identical period in 2019. The percentage changes in 2020 lockdown period as compared to 2019 levels are also given.

PollutantsFull Lockdown Period (23 March – 10th April)
Volume Mixing Ratio (ppb)
Reduction in 2020 w.r.t 2019 (%)
20192020
O337 ± 528 ± 4-25 %
NO225 ± 513 ± 2-50 %
CO1210 ± 170757 ± 110-37 %
VOC1520 ± 240943 ± 150-38 %
Table 2

Percentage change in O3, NO2, CO, and VOCs during Partial Lockdown and Full Lockdown as compared to normal period.

Percentage Change/PollutantO3NO2COVOC
After w.r.t Before (Full Lockdown)-3 %-41 %-39 %-39 %
Full lockdown w.r.t Partial Lockdown3 %-40 %-34 %-46 %
Full Lockdown w.r.t to Normal-7 %-42 %-44 %-31 %
Time series of (a) NO2, (b) CO, (c) VOCs and (d) O3 for period 20th February to 10th April 2020 compared with identical period data of 2019. Average concentration of O3, CO, VOC's and NO2 during the full lockdown period (23 March to 10th April) of 2020 compared with identical period in 2019. The percentage changes in 2020 lockdown period as compared to 2019 levels are also given. Percentage change in O3, NO2, CO, and VOCs during Partial Lockdown and Full Lockdown as compared to normal period. The variability in partial and full lockdown periods with respect to normal period in 2020 is provided in Table-2. A reduction of 40 %, 34 % and 46 % is observed in NO2, CO and VOCs respectively during full lockdown period w.r.t. partial lockdown period. However, a nominal increase of 3 % in ozone level is observed for the same scenario. The reduction during full lockdown period as compared to normal period is found to be 42 %, 44 %, 31 % and 7 % for NO2, CO, VOCs and O3 respectively. Figure 3 (a) shows, the time series of the volume mixing ratios of O3, NO2, CO and VOCs for the period 20th February 2020 to 10th April 2020 covering all 3 periods. Figure 3 (b) shows the relationship between the ratio (NO/NO2)∗100 and ratio VOC/NOx for the same period as Figure 3 (a). As discussed earlier, a significant declining trend in NO2, CO and VOC is observed during the full lockdown period. After about a week of lockdown, levels got stabilized and further no more decline was observed. During this period, the weather was fairly uniform and consistent as confirmed by the automatic weather station co-located with air quality analysers. Smaller fluctuations during this period are mainly due to minor variability in weather parameters. Ozone levels declined in the initial few days after the full lockdown while it was still under the NOx saturation regime which will be discussed in the next section. However, ozone level started increasing from 26th March onwards until around 2nd April. Thereafter, it tends to stabilize around 36 ppb. The variability in the ratio of NO to NO2 and that of VOC to NOx was relatively quite high before full lockdown as compared to lockdown. However, while (NO/NO2)∗100 ratio became constant after the full lockdown, the VOC/NOx ratio increased and touched a peak value coinciding with the minimum in ozone at around 2nd April. Thereafter, VOC/NOx ratio also declined rapidly. The variability of ozone and its relationship with VOC/NOx and (NO/NO2)∗100 are indicated in Figure 3 (b) and explained in the next section.
Figure 3

Distribution of ground level O3, NO2, CO and VOC in Delhi for the 2020 during the period 20th February to 10th April, depicting period before and after COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. (b) shows the ratio (%) of NO by NO2 and that of VOC/NOx before and after COVID-19 lockdown scenario as marked.

Distribution of ground level O3, NO2, CO and VOC in Delhi for the 2020 during the period 20th February to 10th April, depicting period before and after COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. (b) shows the ratio (%) of NO by NO2 and that of VOC/NOx before and after COVID-19 lockdown scenario as marked.

Discussion

This section discusses the processes responsible for the anomalous variability in the volume mixing ratio of ozone during the lockdown period. Surface O3 is formed through photochemical reactions involving NOx (NO + NO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and CO in presence of solar radiation. Surface ozone formation initiates by the photolysis reaction of NO2 in presence of sunlight to produce NO and atomic oxygen (O). This atomic oxygen reacts with oxygen molecule to form ozone (O3) as shown in reaction R1 and R2. The O3 produced rapidly reacts with NO in the atmosphere to form NO2. Therefore, dissociation of O3 takes place as per reaction R3. It implies that an increased (NO/NO2)∗100 ratio reduces the ozone concentration [26]. In a mega city like Delhi, NO is unusually quite high that increases (NO/NO2)∗100 ratio leading to significantly low value of surface ozone (Figure 3a). The effect of reaction R1 is the reverse of reaction R3. In the month of March–April under fair weather conditions temperature remains in the range of 13.5–24.5 °C the reaction R3 dominates: The mechanism for the formation of ozone by reactions of various VOC with the OH radical is written below (R4). However, the presence of VOC and NOx allows OH to be regenerated and promote formation of O3 through NO2 photolysis. NO2 is photolyzed to generate atomic oxygen which then combines with oxygen to produce ozone (R5). The rate of ozone formation is controlled primarily by the rate of the initial reaction of VOC with OH. The following equation indicates the sequence of chemical reactions of VOC and NOx in the formation of ozone [27]. Net: Here, RO2 represents any organics with an oxygen molecule attached and M is neutral number density acting as third body. CARB stands for carbonyl compounds, which play the role of hydrocarbons in further oxidation steps. OH and HO2 are short-lived radicals which play an important role in the ozone formation process. Wang group [28] developed the O3 attribution technique for O3 source apportionment in regional chemical transport models to divide the entire range of VOC-NOx-O3 formation sensitivity to VOC-limited, transition, and NOx-limited regimes based on the value of a regime indicator R which provides much needed insight into VOC-NOx-O3 mechanism. However all these work are based on modelling. Ozone production in Delhi under normal condition (before lockdown) follows the NOx-saturated or VOC-limited [29] regime because of high NOx level. As evident from Figure 3, that level of ozone and its precursors follow usual normal trend in the Normal scenario, which continued, into partial lockdown period as reaction R3 remained much stronger. However, immediately after the full lockdown (23rd March), the levels of NO2, CO and HC decreased sharply. However, reaction R3 was still stronger which resulted in the fall of ozone amount from 31 ppb (23 March) to 16.5 ppb (26th March) as value of (NO/NO2)∗100 ratio (Figure 3b) steadily increased from 100 % to 130 % and NO2 value touched 14 ppb. Thereafter, ozone started to increase because it entered in NOx sensitive regime (11–14 ppb) when production of ozone by reaction R1 started to dominate as compared to loses through reaction R3 and the ratio of (NO/NO2)∗100 declined (Figure 3b). At this point, NOx level reached saturation level remain constant at 11 ppb from 29th March onwards where production of ozone by R1 and loss of ozone by R3 balanced each other. At the same time, levels of CO and VOC also became saturated and constant. Hence, it can be stated that 11 ppb is the new threshold saturation level for NO2 and 700 ppb for CO in Delhi. Thereafter, ozone levels continued to surge and became insensitive to NOx. It appeared that a change over from NOx sensitive to VOC-sensitive regime has taken place when ozone increased. However, that was not the case as Figure 2. VOC Figure 2(c) was found to decline contrary to our basic understanding of VOC sensitive regime. A study carried out in Chengdu, China to explore the ozone pollution also concluded that VOC sensitive regime is most dominating in major Chengdu stations and hence its control is important for ozone control [17]. A decrease in VOC/NOx ratio (Figure 3(b)) of 55 from (27th March) to 30 (2rd April) was found to be associated with increasing ozone trend, which was a result of lowering of NOx value rather than a high VOC level. Ratio of VOC/NOx became stagnant at 30 from 3rd April onwards when ozone touched a peak level of 36 ppb and became stagnant between 31-36 ppb. Hence, the ozone variability is controlled by VOC/NOx ratio rather than VOC alone. This suggests that during the last part of full lockdown, when levels of NO2, CO and VOCs became almost constant at lower level, the basic characteristics of NOx-sensitive and VOC-sensitive regimes is found to be displaced in controlling the ozone variability and a complex O3-NOx-VOCs chemistry indicated the stronger role of VOC/NOx ratio and levels of CO. In this study, summer baseline level of VOC is found to be 900 ppb as per Figure 3(a). However, defining baseline level of ozone is complex and hence avoided in this work.

Conclusions

This study concludes that the concentrations of NO2, CO and VOC declined by 35–50 % during COVID-19 induced lockdown in Delhi, a Mega-city in India. The variability in the Ozone levels is complex and is characterized by a decline then, an increase even after near negligible emissions of its precursors. This study provides observation-based insight on the processes leading to complex relationship of O3-NOx-VOC mechanism, which not necessarily follows the known NOx-sensitive versus VOC-sensitive regimes but tends to suggest that generalizations about these regime conditions are subject to exceptions. Full lockdown opportunity has given us a chance of discover markers of summer baseline level concentration that can be used in atmospheric chemistry transport modellers for better accounting the processes defining O3-NOx-VOC mechanism. The advantage of ozone as disinfectant and its harmful effect when directly exposed to human being should be understood in proper perspective.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

G. Beig, A. Rathod, S. Singh and S.K. Sahu: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive anyspecific grant from commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.
  8 in total

1.  Ozone trends across the United States over a period of decreasing NOx and VOC emissions.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Adam Reff; Benjamin Wells; Jia Xing; Neil Frank
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Attribution of Tropospheric Ozone to NO x and VOC Emissions: Considering Ozone Formation in the Transition Regime.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Yuan Chen; Jianlin Hu; Hongliang Zhang; Qi Ying
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Exploring ozone pollution in Chengdu, southwestern China: A case study from radical chemistry to O3-VOC-NOx sensitivity.

Authors:  Zhaofeng Tan; Keding Lu; Meiqing Jiang; Rong Su; Huabin Dong; Limin Zeng; Shaodong Xie; Qinwen Tan; Yuanhang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  CAMx Ozone Source Attribution in the Eastern United States using Guidance from Observations during DISCOVER-AQ Maryland.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Timothy P Vinciguerra; Daniel C Anderson; Linda Hembeck; Timothy P Canty; Sheryl H Ehrman; Douglas K Martins; Ryan M Stauffer; Anne M Thompson; Ross J Salawitch; Russell R Dickerson
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.720

5.  Response of major air pollutants to COVID-19 lockdowns in China.

Authors:  Zhipeng Pei; Ge Han; Xin Ma; Hang Su; Wei Gong
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  COVID-19: Disease, management, treatment, and social impact.

Authors:  Imran Ali; Omar M L Alharbi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: A blessing in disguise?

Authors:  Sulaman Muhammad; Xingle Long; Muhammad Salman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Meteorology-normalized variations of air quality during the COVID-19 lockdown in three Chinese megacities.

Authors:  Yunqian Lv; Hezhong Tian; Lining Luo; Shuhan Liu; Xiaoxuan Bai; Hongyan Zhao; Shumin Lin; Shuang Zhao; Zhihui Guo; Yifei Xiao; Junqi Yang
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.831

2.  Diverse spillover effects of COVID-19 control measures on air quality improvement: evidence from typical Chinese cities.

Authors:  Laijun Zhao; Yu Wang; Honghao Zhang; Ying Qian; Pingle Yang; Lixin Zhou
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.080

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.