| Literature DB >> 29616470 |
Muhammad Masoom Javaid1, Behram Ali Khan2,3, Srinivas Subramanian2,3.
Abstract
Late-presenting end-stage renal disease is a significant problem worldwide. Up to 70% of patients start dialysis in an unplanned manner without a definitive dialysis access in place. Haemodialysis via a central venous catheter is the default modality for the majority of such patients, and peritoneal dialysis is usually not considered as a feasible option. However, in the recent years, some reports on urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in the late-presenting end-stage renal disease have been published. The collective experience shows that PD can be a safe, efficient and cost-effective alternative to haemodialysis in late-presenting end-stage renal disease with comparable outcomes to the conventional peritoneal dialysis and urgent-start haemodialysis. More importantly, as compared to urgent-start haemodialysis via a central venous catheter, urgent-start peritoneal dialysis has significantly fewer incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections, dialysis-related complications and need for dialysis catheter re-insertions during the initial phase of the therapy. This article examines the rationale and feasibility for starting peritoneal dialysis urgently in late-presenting end-stage renal disease patients and reviews the literature to compare the urgent-start peritoneal dialysis with conventional peritoneal dialysis and urgent-start haemodialysis.Entities:
Keywords: End-stage renal disease; Haemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Unplanned start; Urgent start
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29616470 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0485-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nephrol ISSN: 1121-8428 Impact factor: 3.902