Literature DB >> 20592099

Early initiation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in patients undergoing surgical implantation of Tenckhoff catheters.

Ya-Fei Yang1, Huang-Joe Wang, Chin-Chung Yeh, Hsin-Hung Lin, Chiu-Ching Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nephrologists commonly recommend continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with break-in periods of at least 2 weeks. We investigated the safety and feasibility of shorter break-in periods following surgical implantation of Tenckhoff catheters.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 310 patients that underwent Tenckhoff catheter implantation for the first time. The early group comprised 226 patients that started CAPD ≤ 14 days after implantation; the late group comprised 84 patients that started CAPD > 14 days after implantation. Catheter-related complications within 6 months were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were enrolled. Time to CAPD initiation was shorter in the early group (2.0 ± 2.7 days) than in the late group (40.6 ± 42.8 days) (p < 0.001). The bridge hemodialysis rate was higher in the late group (57.1%) than in the early group (31.4%) (p < 0.001). Overall, 33 early-group (14.6%) and 11 late-group patients (13.1%) developed catheter-related complications within 6 months. The early-group complications were leakage (n = 5), diminished outflow volume (n = 7), migration (n = 7), pericatheter hernia (n = 1), hemoperitoneum (n = 1), pericatheter infection (n = 3), and peritonitis (n = 9). The late-group complications were leakage (n = 2), diminished outflow volume (n = 5), migration (n = 2), and peritonitis (n = 2). Actuarial freedom from catheter-related complications was similar in both groups (log rank, p = 0.76).
CONCLUSION: Early initiation of CAPD with surgically implanted Tenckhoff catheters is feasible and safe. Shorter break-in periods are not associated with more catheter-related complications. The data from our peritoneal dialysis population suggest that early initiation is not associated with an increased number of complications. This needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592099     DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Peritoneal dialysis--an ideal initial dialysis mode].

Authors:  Heidi Puttinger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-02

2.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the right lower quadrant is associated with a lower risk of catheter tip migration: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Lei Lan; Jielong Jiang; Peng Wang; Wei Ren; Zhao Hu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  A modified open surgery technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement decreases catheter malfunction.

Authors:  Chunming Jiang; Linfeng Xu; Yun Chen; Xiang Yan; Cheng Sun; Miao Zhang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 4.  The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Olivier Devuyst; Simon J Davies; David W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Peritoneal dialysis as initial dialysis modality: a viable option for late-presenting end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Muhammad Masoom Javaid; Behram Ali Khan; Srinivas Subramanian
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Success of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Canadian Renal Program.

Authors:  Ali M A Alkatheeri; Peter G Blake; Daryl Gray; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Yaorong Liu; Lin Zhang; Aiwu Lin; Zhaohui Ni; Jiaqi Qian; Wei Fang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  [Surgical aspects of peritoneal dialysis].

Authors:  Gerd R Silberhumer; Herwig Pokorny; Georg Györi; Ferdinand Mühlbacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-02

9.  Comparison of Early Mechanical and Infective Complications in First Time Blind, Bedside, Midline Percutaneous Tenckhoff Catheter Insertion with Ultra-Short Break-In Period in Diabetics and Non-Diabetics: Setting New Standards.

Authors:  Ninoo George; Suceena Alexander; Vinoi George David; Gopal Basu; Anjali Mohapatra; Anna T Valson; Shibu Jacob; Harish K Pathak; Antony Devasia; Veerasamy Tamilarasi; Santosh Varughese
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Carmel M Hawley; Yeoungjee Cho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.