Literature DB >> 19092128

Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality.

Stephen P McDonald1, Mark R Marshall, David W Johnson, Kevan R Polkinghorne.   

Abstract

Mortality differences between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are widely debated. In this study, mortality was compared between patients treated with PD and HD (including home HD) using data from 27,015 patients in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, 25,287 of whom were still receiving PD or HD 90 d after entry into the registry. Overall mortality rates were significantly lower during the 90- to 365-d period among those being treated with PD at day 90 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 0.99]; P < 0.001). This effect, however, varied in direction and size with the presence of comorbidities: Younger patients without comorbidities had a mortality advantage with PD treatment, but other groups did not. After 12 mo, the use of PD at day 90 was associated with significantly increased mortality (adjusted HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.42; P < 0.001). In a supplementary as-treated analysis, PD treatment was associated with lower mortality during the first 90 d (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.81; P < 0.001). These data suggest that the effect of dialysis modality on survival for an individual depends on time, age, and presence of comorbidities. Treatment with PD may be advantageous initially but may be associated with higher mortality after 12 mo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19092128      PMCID: PMC2615722          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2007111188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  36 in total

1.  Variable selection for propensity score models.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The success story of peritoneal dialysis in Romania: analysis of differences in mortality by dialysis modality and influence of risk factors in a national cohort.

Authors:  Gabriel Mircescu; Liliana Garneata; Laura Florea; Vasile Cepoi; Dimitrie Capsa; Maria Covic; Mirela Gherman-Caprioara; Gheorghe Gluhovschi; Ovidiu Sorin Golea; Carmen Barbulescu; Elvira Rus; Caterina Santimbrean; Nicoleta Mardare; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Factors influencing reported rates of treated end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Stephen McDonald; Margaret McCredie; Sheila Williams; John Stewart
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.620

4.  Outcome of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in elderly patients with diabetes: early experience from Bangladesh.

Authors:  M Masud Iqbal; M Nurul Islam; M Abul Mansur; G Maola Naeem; Humayun Sattar; R Mokarram Hossain; Mohammed Mohsin; M Habibur Rahman; H Ur Rashid
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2005

5.  Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Y S Liem; J B Wong; M G M Hunink; F Th de Charro; W C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Associates of mortality among peritoneal dialysis patients with special reference to peritoneal transport rates and solute clearance.

Authors:  J A Diaz-Buxo; E G Lowrie; N L Lew; S M Zhang; X Zhu; J M Lazarus
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us?

Authors:  E F Vonesh; J J Snyder; R N Foley; A J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

8.  Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Bernard G Jaar; Josef Coresh; Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; John H Sadler; Alan Kliger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Trends in hemodialysis vascular access from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Louise M Moist; Sean H Chang; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Mortality by dialysis modality among patients who have end-stage renal disease and are awaiting renal transplantation.

Authors:  Jula K Inrig; Jie L Sun; Qinghong Yang; Libbie P Briley; Lynda A Szczech
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  92 in total

1.  Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Ron Wald; Philip McFarlane; Joanne M Bargman; Edward Vonesh; Yingbo Na; S Vanita Jassal; Louise Moist
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Adverse outcomes among Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Paul Komenda; Amy R Sood; Martina Reslerova; Mauro Verrelli; Chris Sathianathan; Loretta Eng; Amanda Eng; Claudio Rigatto
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Hemodialysis duration impairs food intake and nutritional parameters in chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Khedidja Mekki; Mustapha Remaoun; Jacques Belleville; Malika Bouchenak
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Dialysis modality after renal transplant failure.

Authors:  Clare Castledine; Fergus J Caskey
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Is dialysis modality a factor in the survival of patients initiating dialysis after kidney transplant failure?

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; James Dong; Caren Rose; Sarbjit Vanita Jassal; John S Gill
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Outcomes of dialytic modalities in a large incident registry cohort from Eastern Europe: the Romanian Renal Registry.

Authors:  Gabriel Mircescu; Gabriel Stefan; Liliana Gârneaţă; Irina Mititiuc; Dimitrie Siriopol; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers.

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 28.314

8.  Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis.

Authors:  Blair S Grace; Philip A Clayton; Nicholas A Gray; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Cost analysis of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis access in incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  Luis A Coentrão; Carla S Araújo; Carlos A Ribeiro; Claúdia C Dias; Manuel J Pestana
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Mortality and Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Among Hepatitis C Virus-Seropositive Maintenance Dialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Deirdre Sawinski; Kimberly A Forde; Vincent Lo Re; David S Goldberg; Jordana B Cohen; Jayme E Locke; Roy D Bloom; Colleen Brensinger; Joe Weldon; Justine Shults; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.