Literature DB >> 29616448

Reliability and One-Year Stability of the PIN3 Neighborhood Environmental Audit in Urban and Rural Neighborhoods.

Anna K Porter1, Fang Wen2, Amy H Herring3, Daniel A Rodríguez4, Lynne C Messer5, Barbara A Laraia6, Kelly R Evenson7.   

Abstract

Reliable and stable environmental audit instruments are needed to successfully identify the physical and social attributes that may influence physical activity. This study described the reliability and stability of the PIN3 environmental audit instrument in both urban and rural neighborhoods. Four randomly sampled road segments in and around a one-quarter mile buffer of participants' residences from the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition (PIN3) study were rated twice, approximately 2 weeks apart. One year later, 253 of the year 1 sampled roads were re-audited. The instrument included 43 measures that resulted in 73 item scores for calculation of percent overall agreement, kappa statistics, and log-linear models. For same-day reliability, 81% of items had moderate to outstanding kappa statistics (kappas ≥ 0.4). Two-week reliability was slightly lower, with 77% of items having moderate to outstanding agreement using kappa statistics. One-year stability had 68% of items showing moderate to outstanding agreement using kappa statistics. The reliability of the audit measures was largely consistent when comparing urban to rural locations, with only 8% of items exhibiting significant differences (α < 0.05) by urbanicity. The PIN3 instrument is a reliable and stable audit tool for studies assessing neighborhood attributes in urban and rural environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active transport; Built environment; Measurement; Physical activity; Walkability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616448      PMCID: PMC5993700          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-018-0243-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  37 in total

1.  Inter-rater and test-retest reliability: methods and results for the neighborhood observational checklist.

Authors:  Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Graciela Mentz; James S House; Clarence C Gravlee; Patricia Y Miranda; Patricia Miller; Srimathi Kannan
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Active neighborhood checklist: a user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness.

Authors:  Christine M Hoehner; Andrae Ivy; Laura K Brennan Ramirez; Susan Handy; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

3.  Using Google Earth to conduct a neighborhood audit: reliability of a virtual audit instrument.

Authors:  Philippa Clarke; Jennifer Ailshire; Robert Melendez; Michael Bader; Jeffrey Morenoff
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Measuring the neighborhood environment: associations with young girls' energy intake and expenditure in a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; Steven E Gregorich; Barbara A Laraia; Lawrence H Kushi; Irene H Yen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Measuring physical activity environments: a brief history.

Authors:  James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The NIfETy method for environmental assessment of neighborhood-level indicators of violence, alcohol, and other drug exposure.

Authors:  C D M Furr-Holden; M J Smart; J L Pokorni; N S Ialongo; P J Leaf; H D Holder; J C Anthony
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2008-10-18

7.  Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).

Authors:  Rachel A Millstein; Kelli L Cain; James F Sallis; Terry L Conway; Carrie Geremia; Lawrence D Frank; Jim Chapman; Delfien Van Dyck; Lindsay R Dipzinski; Jacqueline Kerr; Karen Glanz; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The Wisconsin Assessment of the Social and Built Environment (WASABE): a multi-dimensional objective audit instrument for examining neighborhood effects on health.

Authors:  Kristen C Malecki; Corinne D Engelman; Paul E Peppard; F Javier Nieto; Maggie L Grabow; Milena Bernardinello; Erin Bailey; Andrew J Bersch; Matthew C Walsh; Justin Y Lo; Ana Martinez-Donate
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Assessing urban and rural neighborhood characteristics using audit and GIS data: derivation and reliability of constructs.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Amy H Herring; Lynne Messer; Barbara A Laraia; Daniel A Rodríguez
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Objective assessment of urban built environment related to physical activity--development, reliability and validity of the China Urban Built Environment Scan Tool (CUBEST).

Authors:  Meng Su; Yu-Kun Du; Qing-Min Liu; Yan-Jun Ren; Ichiro Kawachi; Jun Lv; Li-Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Association between Neighborhood Environments and Physical Activity from Pregnancy to Postpartum: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Anna K Porter; Daniel A Rodríguez; Brian G Frizzelle; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS).

Authors:  Madeleine Steinmetz-Wood; Kabisha Velauthapillai; Grace O'Brien; Nancy A Ross
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.