| Literature DB >> 20515487 |
Cindy W Leung1, Steven E Gregorich, Barbara A Laraia, Lawrence H Kushi, Irene H Yen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood environments affect children's health outcomes. Observational methods used to assess neighborhoods can be categorized as indirect, intermediate, or direct. Direct methods, involving in-person audits of the neighborhoods conducted by trained observers, are recognized as an accurate representation of current neighborhood conditions. The authors investigated the associations of various neighborhood characteristics with young girls' diet and physical activity.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20515487 PMCID: PMC2893449 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ISSN: 1479-5868 Impact factor: 6.457
Figure 1Sample map of a quarter-mile radius around an arbitrary residence demonstrating the highlighted streets audited by street observers.
Baseline Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants (n = 215)
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 7.4 (0.4) | Range: 6.5-8.1 |
| Age of birth mother, mean (SD) | 40.0 (5.8) | Range: 22.0-54.0 |
| Height in cm, mean (SD) | 125.0 (6.2) | Range 114.0-144.5 |
| Weight in kg, mean (SD) | 27.2 (6.8) | Range 16.8-57.3 |
| Body mass index (BMI), mean (SD) | 17.3 (3.0) | Range 12.2, 29.0 |
| Household size, mean (SD) | 4.1 (1.0) | Range 2.0-8.0 |
| Total energy intake, kcals, mean (SD) | 1572.9 (316.8) | Range 810.4 - 2760.3 |
| Physical activity, MET hours/week, mean (SD) | 11.9 (14.3) | Range 0 - 80.0 |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||
| Non-Hispanic White | 87 | 40.5 |
| African-American | 41 | 19.1 |
| Asian | 10 | 4.7 |
| Hispanic/Latina | 50 | 23.3 |
| Other or Multiple | 27 | 12.6 |
| Overweight status (BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) | ||
| Not overweight | 151 | 70.2 |
| Overweight or obese | 64 | 29.8 |
| Household income | ||
| < $25,000 | 11 | 5.1 |
| $25,000 - $49,999 | 34 | 15.8 |
| $50,000 - $74,999 | 33 | 15.3 |
| $75,000 - $99,999 | 43 | 20.0 |
| ≥ $100,000 | 91 | 42.3 |
| Missing | 3 | 1.4 |
MET, metabolic equivalent
Correlation between neighborhood deprivation and neighborhood scales (n = 213)a
| Neighborhood Deprivation Index | Scales derived from Exploratory Factor Analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed residential and commercial | Food and retail | Recreation | Walkability | Physical disorder | ||
| Neighborhood deprivation score | 1.00 | |||||
| Mixed residential and commercial | 0.51** | 1.00 | ||||
| Food and retail | 0.08 | 0.63** | 1.00 | |||
| Recreation | -0.04 | 0.19* | 0.15* | 1.00 | ||
| Walkability | 0.12 | 0.37** | 0.30** | 0.56** | 1.00 | |
| Physical disorder | 0.33** | 0.65** | 0.57** | 0.14* | 0.33** | 1.00 |
* P > 0.05
** P > 0.0001
a Two girls were excluded from regression analyses due to missing Neighborhood Deprivation Index
Associations Between the Neighborhood Environment and Total Energy Intake (kcals/day) (n = 210)a
| Model | Neighborhood | Scales derived from Exploratory Factor Analysis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed residential | Food | Recreation | Walkability | Physical disorder | ||||||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Model 1b | 0.97 | 0.88, 1.07 | 0.94 | 0.86, 1.03 | 0.83* | 0.73, 0.94 | 1.02 | 0.87, 1.21 | 1.12 | 0.91, 1.37 | 0.92 | 0.70, 1.20 |
| Model 2c | 0.97 | 0.85, 1.10 | 0.94 | 0.85, 1.03 | 0.84* | 0.74, 0.95 | 1.03 | 0.87, 1.22 | 1.06 | 0.86, 1.32 | 0.97 | 0.73, 1.29 |
| Model 3d | 0.98 | 0.85, 1.12 | 0.93 | 0.84, 1.03 | 0.84* | 0.74, 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.82, 1.17 | 1.01 | 0.81, 1.26 | 0.95 | 0.71, 1.27 |
* P > 0.05
a Five girls were excluded from regression analyses due to missing Neighborhood Deprivation Index or total caloric intake.
b Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl.
c Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl, age, race/ethnicity, and BMI.
d Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl, age, race/ethnicity, BMI, household size, age of birth mother, and household income. Three girls were further excluded due to missing household income information. N = 207
Associations Between the Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity (MET hours/week) (n = 207)a
| Model description | Neighborhood Deprivation Index | Scales derived from Exploratory Factor Analysis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed residential and commercial | Food and retail | Recreation | Walkability | Physical disorder | ||||||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Model 1b | 0.80* | 0.72, 0.89 | 0.91* | 0.83, 0.99 | 1.03 | 0.91, 1.16 | 1.14 | 0.96, 1.36 | 1.11 | 0.91, 1.37 | 0.73* | 0.55, 0.96 |
| Model 2c | 0.89 | 0.78, 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.87, 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.88, 1.13 | 1.10 | 0.92, 1.31 | 1.08 | 0.87, 1.34 | 0.78 | 0.58, 1.04 |
| Model 3d | 0.92 | 0.80, 1.06 | 0.99 | 0.89, 1.10 | 1.01 | 0.88, 1.15 | 1.10 | 0.91, 1.32 | 1.09 | 0.86, 1.37 | 0.80 | 0.59, 1.07 |
| Non-Hispanic White | 1.30 | 0.91, 1.86 | 0.97 | 0.83, 1.13 | 0.98 | 0.80, 1.20 | 1.01 | 0.75, 1.34 | 0.97 | 0.72, 1.30 | 0.92 | 0.63, 1.34 |
| African-American | 0.86 | 0.68, 1.09 | 0.99 | 0.82, 1.18 | 0.81 | 0.57, 1.14 | 0.77 | 0.47, 1.26 | 0.91 | 0.50, 1.64 | 0.31* | 0.12, 0.80 |
| Asian | 0.43 | 0.09, 2.12 | 0.88 | 0.59, 1.30 | 1.12 | 0.75, 1.68 | 0.90 | 0.44, 1.84 | 0.21 | 0.03, 1.55 | 1.46 | 0.03, 69.37 |
| Hispanic/Latina | 0.79 | 0.63, 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.83, 1.14 | 0.95 | 0.75, 1.21 | 1.94* | 1.31, 2.88 | 1.71* | 1.11, 2.63 | 0.64 | 0.34, 1.20 |
| Other or Multiple | 1.12 | 0.76, 1.64 | 1.08 | 0.88, 1.31 | 1.10 | 0.87, 1.39 | 0.79 | 0.48, 1.30 | 0.95 | 0.49, 1.85 | 0.78 | 0.39, 1.56 |
MET, metabolic equivalent
* P < 0.05
a Eight girls were excluded from regression analyses due to missing Neighborhood Deprivation Index or MET hours per week
b Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl.
c Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl, age, race/ethnicity, and BMI.
d Adjusted for total number of streets observed per girl, age, race/ethnicity, BMI, household size, age of birth mother, and household income. Two girls were further excluded due to missing household income information. N = 205.