| Literature DB >> 29615642 |
Wei Wei1, Wei Hu1, Xian-Yi Zhang1, Feng-Ping Zhang2, Su-Qin Sun3, Yuan Liu4, Chang-Hua Xu5,6.
Abstract
A developed Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was employed to investigate changes of protein conformation, which played significant roles in maintaining stable protein networks of white croaker surimi gel, exploring the relationship between protein conformation and surimi gel networks. Spectra of surimi and gels with different grades (A, AA, FA and SA) were analyzed by tri-step FT-IR method and peak-fitting of deconvolved and baseline corrected amide I bands (1600~1700 cm-1). The result showed that α-helix was the main conformation of surimi proteins. During surimi gelation, α-helix of myosin partially transformed into β-sheet, β-turn and random coil structures. β-sheet and random coil structures were the main protein conformations maintaining the structure of surimi gel, of which β-sheet made the main contribution to gel strength. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) result revealed that surimi gels had a fibrous and homogeneous network structure. Moreover, ordered interconnections between three-dimensional proteins networks of gels were inclined to emerge in higher grade surimi, in agreement with the gel strength results. It was demonstrated that the tri-step FT-IR spectroscopy combined with peak-fitting could be applicable for exploration of surimi protein conformation changes during gelation to deepen understanding of its effect on gel quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29615642 PMCID: PMC5882903 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23645-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Chemical composition of four grades of surimi.
Figure 2IR spectra of A, AA, FA and SA surimi.
Figure 3Second derivative spectra of surimi and gels in the region of 1700~1600 cm−1.
Figure 42DCOS-IR synchronous spectra of surimi and gels in the region of 1600~1680 cm−1.
Auto-peaks in 2DCOS-IR synchronous spectra of surimi and gels.
| Samples | Autopeaks/cm−1 (Threshold 50% of relative intensity) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| 1630 | 1636 | 1644 | 1652 | 1656 | 1685 | |||
|
|
| 1630 | 1639 | 1647 | 1652 | 1657 | 1667 | 1686 | 1694 | ||
|
|
| 1634 | 1638 | 1643 | 1647 | 1653 | 1658 | 1666 | 1670 | 1676 | |
|
|
| 1632 | 1636 | 1640 | 1645 | 1653 | 1659 | 1667 | |||
|
|
|
| 1628 | 1638 |
| 1657 | 1682 | ||||
|
|
| 1637 | 1642 | 1659 | 1674 | 1685 | |||||
|
|
| 1630 |
| 1642 |
| 1659 | |||||
|
| 1624 | 1629 | 1634 | 1638 |
| 1656 | 1682 | ||||
Notes: Peaks in bold are strong auto-peaks.
Contents of the secondary structure in surimi and gels with different grades (n = 3).
| Samples | Percent (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-Helix | β-Sheet | Turn | Random Coil | ||
|
|
| 44.79 ± 3.21 | 32.98 ± 2.15 | 7.96 ± 1.22 | 14.27 ± 0.98 |
|
| 43.94 ± 4.69 | 33.94 ± 1.26 | 7.92 ± 0.95 | 14.20 ± 1.25 | |
|
| 44.57 ± 3.52 | 33.39 ± 2.46 | 7.75 ± 1.36 | 14.29 ± 2.01 | |
|
| 44.18 ± 2.30 | 33.74 ± 1.23 | 7.747 ± 1.25 | 14.347 ± 2.37 | |
|
|
| 14.617 ± 2.86 | 43.687 ± 4.45 | 13.287 ± 2.65 | 28.437 ± 3.75 |
|
| 13.657 ± 1.26 | 45.107 ± 2.38 | 12.097 ± 1.63 | 29.167 ± 2.58 | |
|
| 13.617 ± 0.94 | 46.187 ± 3.46 | 12.207 ± 1.45 | 28.017 ± 1.96 | |
|
| 14.497 ± 1.65 | 44.907 ± 2.72 | 12.707 ± 2.29 | 27.91 ± 1.72 | |
Note: Values in the table denote the mean ± standard error.
Texture properties of surimi gels with different grades (n = 3).
| Material | Gel Strength (g·cm) |
|---|---|
| A gel | 492.52 ± 64.65a |
| AA gel | 639.35 ± 61.95b |
| FA gel | 865.60 ± 41.08c |
| SA gel | 1099.89 ± 40.39d |
Note: Values in the table denote the mean ± standard error. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Scanning electron micrographs (1000 × magnifications, bar 100 µm) of surimi and gels with different grades.