Literature DB >> 29615513

Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes.

Nikhil Garg1, Londa Schiebinger2, Dan Jurafsky3,4, James Zou5,6.   

Abstract

Word embeddings are a powerful machine-learning framework that represents each English word by a vector. The geometric relationship between these vectors captures meaningful semantic relationships between the corresponding words. In this paper, we develop a framework to demonstrate how the temporal dynamics of the embedding helps to quantify changes in stereotypes and attitudes toward women and ethnic minorities in the 20th and 21st centuries in the United States. We integrate word embeddings trained on 100 y of text data with the US Census to show that changes in the embedding track closely with demographic and occupation shifts over time. The embedding captures societal shifts-e.g., the women's movement in the 1960s and Asian immigration into the United States-and also illuminates how specific adjectives and occupations became more closely associated with certain populations over time. Our framework for temporal analysis of word embedding opens up a fruitful intersection between machine learning and quantitative social science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethnic stereotypes; gender stereotypes; word embedding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29615513      PMCID: PMC5910851          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720347115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Amy J C Cuddy; Peter Glick; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Stereotype persistence and change among college students.

Authors:  G M GILBERT
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1951-04

3.  Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases.

Authors:  Aylin Caliskan; Joanna J Bryson; Arvind Narayanan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive.

Authors:  Hilary B Bergsieker; Lisa M Leslie; Vanessa S Constantine; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-03-26

5.  On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students.

Authors:  M Karlins; T L Coffman; G Walters
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1969-09

6.  Cultural Shift or Linguistic Drift? Comparing Two Computational Measures of Semantic Change.

Authors:  William L Hamilton; Jure Leskovec; Dan Jurafsky
Journal:  Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process       Date:  2016-11

7.  Women and hysteria in the history of mental health.

Authors:  Cecilia Tasca; Mariangela Rapetti; Mauro Giovanni Carta; Bianca Fadda
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2012-10-19
  7 in total
  41 in total

Review 1.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Speaking of gender bias.

Authors:  May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare.

Authors:  Davide Cirillo; Silvina Catuara-Solarz; Czuee Morey; Emre Guney; Laia Subirats; Simona Mellino; Annalisa Gigante; Alfonso Valencia; María José Rementeria; Antonella Santuccione Chadha; Nikolaos Mavridis
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Assessing the accuracy of automatic speech recognition for psychotherapy.

Authors:  Adam S Miner; Albert Haque; Jason A Fries; Scott L Fleming; Denise E Wilfley; G Terence Wilson; Arnold Milstein; Dan Jurafsky; Bruce A Arnow; W Stewart Agras; Li Fei-Fei; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  Women in Nephrology Today.

Authors:  Eleanor Lederer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Investigation of bias in an epilepsy machine learning algorithm trained on physician notes.

Authors:  Benjamin D Wissel; Hansel M Greiner; Tracy A Glauser; Francesco T Mangano; Daniel Santel; John P Pestian; Rhonda D Szczesniak; Judith W Dexheimer
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning.

Authors:  Melissa D McCradden; Shalmali Joshi; James A Anderson; Mjaye Mazwi; Anna Goldenberg; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Gender-sensitive word embeddings for healthcare.

Authors:  Shunit Agmon; Plia Gillis; Eric Horvitz; Kira Radinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The risk of racial bias while tracking influenza-related content on social media using machine learning.

Authors:  Brandon Lwowski; Anthony Rios
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Gender Bias in the News: A Scalable Topic Modelling and Visualization Framework.

Authors:  Prashanth Rao; Maite Taboada
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.