Literature DB >> 32585698

Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning.

Melissa D McCradden1, Shalmali Joshi2, James A Anderson1,3,4, Mjaye Mazwi5, Anna Goldenberg2,6,7,8, Randi Zlotnik Shaul1,9,10.   

Abstract

Accumulating evidence demonstrates the impact of bias that reflects social inequality on the performance of machine learning (ML) models in health care. Given their intended placement within healthcare decision making more broadly, ML tools require attention to adequately quantify the impact of bias and reduce its potential to exacerbate inequalities. We suggest that taking a patient safety and quality improvement approach to bias can support the quantification of bias-related effects on ML. Drawing from the ethical principles underpinning these approaches, we argue that patient safety and quality improvement lenses support the quantification of relevant performance metrics, in order to minimize harm while promoting accountability, justice, and transparency. We identify specific methods for operationalizing these principles with the goal of attending to bias to support better decision making in light of controllable and uncontrollable factors.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  healthcare delivery; machine learning; patient safety; quality improvement; systematic bias

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585698      PMCID: PMC7727331          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  12 in total

1.  The neglect of racism as an ethical issue in health care.

Authors:  Megan-Jane Johnstone; Olga Kanitsaki
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-11-18

2.  Screening for Social Determinants of Health: The Known and Unknown.

Authors:  Karina W Davidson; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Avery Smith
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes.

Authors:  Nikhil Garg; Londa Schiebinger; Dan Jurafsky; James Zou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Assessing risk, automating racism.

Authors:  Ruha Benjamin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Brian Powers; Christine Vogeli; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Luke Oakden-Rayner; Jared Dunnmon; Gustavo Carneiro; Christopher Ré
Journal:  Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020)       Date:  2020-04

Review 8.  Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care.

Authors:  Jenna Wiens; Suchi Saria; Anna Goldenberg; Mark Sendak; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Vincent X Liu; Finale Doshi-Velez; Kenneth Jung; Katherine Heller; David Kale; Mohammed Saeed; Pilar N Ossorio; Sonoo Thadaney-Israni
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): Developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Selen Bozkurt; John P A Ioannidis; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Impact of a deep learning assistant on the histopathologic classification of liver cancer.

Authors:  Amirhossein Kiani; Bora Uyumazturk; Pranav Rajpurkar; Alex Wang; Rebecca Gao; Erik Jones; Yifan Yu; Curtis P Langlotz; Robyn L Ball; Thomas J Montine; Brock A Martin; Gerald J Berry; Michael G Ozawa; Florette K Hazard; Ryanne A Brown; Simon B Chen; Mona Wood; Libby S Allard; Lourdes Ylagan; Andrew Y Ng; Jeanne Shen
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-02-26
View more
  11 in total

1.  Setting the agenda: an informatics-led policy framework for adaptive CDS.

Authors:  Jeffery Smith
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Melody S Goodman; Yuyu Chen; Xiangying Chu; Richard L Bradshaw; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Priscilla A Chan; Brianne M Daly; Michael Flynn; Amanda Gammon; Rachel Hess; Cecelia Kessler; Wendy K Kohlmann; Devin M Mann; Rachel Monahan; Sara Peel; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Meenakshi Sigireddi; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  Recommendations for the safe, effective use of adaptive CDS in the US healthcare system: an AMIA position paper.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen; Jeffery Smith; Robert R Freimuth; Kenneth W Goodman; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Joseph Kannry; Hongfang Liu; Subha Madhavan; Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Ethics of AI in Pathology: Current Paradigms and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Chhavi Chauhan; Rama R Gullapalli
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology and Laboratory Medicine: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Brian R Jackson; Ye Ye; James M Crawford; Michael J Becich; Somak Roy; Jeffrey R Botkin; Monica E de Baca; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 6.  Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anne A H de Hond; Artuur M Leeuwenberg; Lotty Hooft; Ilse M J Kant; Steven W J Nijman; Hendrikus J A van Os; Jiska J Aardoom; Thomas P A Debray; Ewoud Schuit; Maarten van Smeden; Johannes B Reitsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Niels H Chavannes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 7.  Health Technology Assessment for In Silico Medicine: Social, Ethical and Legal Aspects.

Authors:  Carlo Giacomo Leo; Maria Rosaria Tumolo; Saverio Sabina; Riccardo Colella; Virginia Recchia; Giuseppe Ponzini; Dimitrios Ioannis Fotiadis; Antonella Bodini; Pierpaolo Mincarone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.

Authors:  Stephen R Pfohl; Agata Foryciarz; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Impact of Different Approaches to Preparing Notes for Analysis With Natural Language Processing on the Performance of Prediction Models in Intensive Care.

Authors:  Malini Mahendra; Yanting Luo; Hunter Mills; Gundolf Schenk; Atul J Butte; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Sara Burrous; Bryan A Sisk; Matthew J Schuelke; Jason D Keune; James M DuBois
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.