| Literature DB >> 29615064 |
Alexandra M Binder1, Camila Corvalan2, Antonia M Calafat3, Xiaoyun Ye3, Verónica Mericq4, Ana Pereira2, Karin B Michels5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The age of menarche has been associated with metabolic and cardiovascular disease, as well as cancer risk. The decline in menarcheal age over the past century may be partially attributable to increased exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs).Entities:
Keywords: Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Menarche; Phenols; Phthalates; Puberty
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29615064 PMCID: PMC5883544 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-018-0376-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Study population characteristics
| Characteristic | Distribution |
|---|---|
| Age [years; median (range)] | |
| At B1 EDC Measurement | 7.9 (6.7–9.6) |
| At B4 EDC Measurement | 11.2 (9.4–13.1) |
| Attained Menarche during Study Category [count (%)] | |
| Yes | 182 (91.0) |
| No | 18 (9.0) |
| Age at Menarche [years; median (range)] | 12.0 (9.4–13.8) |
| BMI Z-score [median (range)] | |
| At B1 EDC Measurement | 0.5 (−2.2–2.4) |
| At B4 EDC Measurement | 0.5 (−2.7–2.2) |
| BMI Category [count (%)] | |
| At B1 EDC Measurement | |
| Under-weight or Normal weight (<85th Percentile) | 147 (73.5) |
| Overweight or Obese (≥85th percentile) | 53 (26.5) |
| At B1 EDC Measurement | |
| Under-weight or Normal weight (<85th Percentile) | 137 (68.5) |
| Overweight or Obese (≥85th percentile) | 63 (31.5) |
| Height Z-score [median (range)] | |
| At B1 EDC Measurement | −0.1 (−2.6–2.1) |
| At B4 EDC Measurement | 0.1 (−2.1–2.3) |
| Maternal Education [count (%)] | |
| Post-Secondary Education | 46 (23.0) |
| No Post-Secondary Education | 154 (77.0) |
Menarche hazard ratio (95% CI) associated with log(ng/ml) increase in each EDC biomarker across puberty
| Biomarker | Unadjusted Model | Adjusted Modela | Interaction with Tanner stageb | Interaction with BMIc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-Dichlorophenol | 0.98 (0.87, 1.10) | 1.00 (0.89, 1.12) | 0.246 | 0.062 |
| 2,5-Dichlorophenol | 1.05 (0.97, 1.14) | 1.04 (0.95, 1.14) | 0.017* | 0.975 |
| Benzophenone-3 | 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) | 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) | 0.009** | 0.235 |
| BPA | 0.90 (0.78, 1.05) | 0.92 (0.79, 1.06) | 0.362 | 0.790 |
| MBP | 0.95 (0.84, 1.07) | 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) | 0.565 | 0.396 |
| MBzP | 0.98 (0.87, 1.09) | 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) | 0.729 | 0.891 |
| MCNP | 0.95 (0.82, 1.10) | 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) | 0.392 | 0.797 |
| MCOP | 0.95 (0.81, 1.10) | 0.92 (0.78, 1.09) | 0.638 | 0.790 |
| MCPP | 0.91 (0.80, 1.04) | 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) | 0.157 | 0.252 |
| ΣDEHPd | 1.04 (0.88, 1.22) | 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) | 0.002** | 0.783 |
| MECPP | 1.05 (0.89, 1.24) | 1.02 (0.87, 1.20) | 0.004** | 0.855 |
| MEHHP | 1.03 (0.89, 1.18) | 1.01 (0.88, 1.16) | 0.002** | 0.643 |
| MEHP | 1.01 (0.85, 1.20) | 1.01 (0.85, 1.20) | 0.000*** | 0.909 |
| MEOHP | 1.02 (0.88, 1.19) | 1.01 (0.87, 1.16) | 0.004** | 0.852 |
| MEP | 1.10 (0.99, 1.23) | 1.09 (0.98, 1.21) | 0.177 | 0.033* |
| Methyl Paraben | 1.00 (0.94, 1.07) | 1.00 (0.94, 1.07) | 0.861 | 0.576 |
| MHBP | 1.02 (0.89, 1.16) | 1.02 (0.89, 1.17) | 0.486 | 0.488 |
| MHiBP | 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) | 1.04 (0.88, 1.24) | 0.426 | 0.920 |
| MiBP | 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) | 1.01 (0.86, 1.19) | 0.955 | 0.671 |
| MMP | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) | 1.08 (0.97, 1.22) | 0.017* | 0.262 |
| Propyl Paraben | 0.99 (0.92, 1.05) | 0.99 (0.93, 1.05) | 0.495 | 0.160 |
| Triclosan | 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | 1.00 (0.92, 1.08) | 0.956 | 0.033* |
aAccelerated failure time model adjusting for BMI Z-score, and maternal education
bp-value for interaction between continuous biomarker concentration and Tanner stage at biomarker measurement in adjusted models
cp-value for interaction between continuous biomarker concentration and BMI Z-score in adjusted models
dunits in log(nmol/l) reflecting the log transformed summation of DEHP metabolite concentrations
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Menarche hazard ratio (95% CI) between tertiles of each EDC biomarker across pubertya
| Biomarker | Middle vs Lowest Tertile | Highest vs Middle Tertile | Highest vs Lowest Tertile | Trendb ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-Dichlorophenol | 1.03 (0.79, 1.35) | 1.01 (0.79, 1.30) | 1.04 (0.80, 1.37) | 0.701 |
| BPA | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) | 0.86 (0.67, 1.11) | 0.91 (0.70, 1.20) | 0.695 |
| MBP | 0.95 (0.74, 1.23) | 1.00 (0.76, 1.31) | 0.95 (0.69, 1.31) | 0.749 |
| MBzP | 0.70* (0.54, 0.93) | 1.16 (0.88, 1.55) | 0.82 (0.62, 1.08) | 0.155 |
| MCNP | 0.99 (0.77, 1.27) | 0.91 (0.67, 1.23) | 0.89 (0.67, 1.19) | 0.433 |
| MCOP | 0.94 (0.72, 1.22) | 0.99 (0.75, 1.30) | 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) | 0.661 |
| MCPP | 0.92 (0.67, 1.26) | 0.84 (0.63, 1.13) | 0.77 (0.57, 1.04) | 0.116 |
| MEP | 1.00 (0.74, 1.34) | 1.20 (0.88, 1.62) | 1.19 (0.90, 1.57) | 0.212 |
| Methyl Paraben | 0.96 (0.71, 1.29) | 1.14 (0.84, 1.54) | 1.09 (0.81, 1.47) | 0.575 |
| MHBP | 0.94 (0.72, 1.23) | 1.10 (0.88, 1.39) | 1.04 (0.76, 1.41) | 0.808 |
| MHiBP | 0.98 (0.76, 1.26) | 1.09 (0.86, 1.39) | 1.07 (0.82, 1.39) | 0.654 |
| MiBP | 0.85 (0.63, 1.15) | 1.13 (0.85, 1.50) | 0.96 (0.74, 1.26) | 0.763 |
| Propyl Paraben | 0.83 (0.60, 1.13) | 1.20 (0.85, 1.68) | 0.99 (0.73, 1.33) | 0.918 |
| Triclosan | 0.85 (0.66, 1.10) | 1.05 (0.84, 1.30) | 0.90 (0.67, 1.20) | 0.536 |
aAccelerated failure time model adjusting for BMI Z-score and maternal education; restricting to the subset of associations for which there was no significant interaction between Tanner stage at biomarker measurement and biomarker concentration on timing of menarche (p > 0.05)
bTrend evaluated by modeling the log(median) concentration within tertiles as a continuous variable
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1Median menarcheal age (95% CI) between tertiles of EDC biomarker concentrations across Tanner stages. Significant difference (p < 0.05) between: tertiles 1 and 2 indicated by A, tertiles 2 and 3 indicated by B, and tertiles 1 and 3 indicated by C
Menarche hazard ratio (95% CI) associated with log(ng/ml) increase in biomarker stratified by Tanner stagea
| Tanner Stage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker | B1 | B4 |
| 2,5-Dichlorophenol | 1.13* (1.01, 1.27) | 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) |
| Benzophenone-3 | 1.17** (1.06, 1.29) | 0.99 (0.91, 1.06) |
| ΣDEHPb | 0.77* (0.60, 0.98) | 1.24 (0.97, 1.57) |
| MECPP | 0.79 (0.61, 1.01) | 1.24 (0.97, 1.58) |
| MEHHP | 0.77* (0.62, 0.96) | 1.22 (0.98, 1.51) |
| MEHP | 0.80* (0.65, 0.98) | 1.20 (0.98, 1.47) |
| MEOHP | 0.78* (0.63, 0.97) | 1.20 (0.96, 1.50) |
| MMP | 0.96 (0.81, 1.14) | 1.30** (1.10, 1.53) |
aAccelerated failure time model adjusting for BMI Z-score and maternal education; including an interaction between Tanner stage at biomarker measurement and concentration; restricted to subset of associations for which the interaction with the timing of biomarker measurement was significant (p < 0.05)
bunits in log(nmol/l) reflecting the log transformed summation of DEHP metabolite concentrations
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Menarche hazard ratio (95% CI) between tertiles of biomarker stratified by Tanner stage at measurementa
| Biomarker | Tanner Stage | Middle vs Lowest Tertile | Highest vs Middle Tertile | Highest vs Lowest Tertile | Trendb (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,5-Dichlorophenol | |||||
| 1 | 1.35 (0.93, 1.98) | 1.17 (0.81, 1.68) | 1.58* (1.09, 2.29) | 0.019* | |
| 4 | 1.16 (0.79, 1.69) | 0.79 (0.55, 1.14) | 0.91 (0.62, 1.35) | 0.521 | |
| Benzophenone-3 | |||||
| 1 | 1.58** (1.12, 2.22) | 0.89 (0.60, 1.34) | 1.41 (0.96, 2.06) | 0.142 | |
| 4 | 0.87 (0.61, 1.24) | 1.07 (0.74, 1.54) | 0.93 (0.63, 1.37) | 0.743 | |
| ΣDEHP | |||||
| 1 | 0.43*** (0.31, 0.61) | 1.56* (1.09, 2.25) | 0.67* (0.46, 0.98) | 0.140 | |
| 4 | 0.93 (0.64, 1.36) | 1.52* (1.01, 2.28) | 1.42 (0.93, 2.17) | 0.083 | |
| MECPP | |||||
| 1 | 0.43*** (0.30, 0.62) | 1.63** (1.15, 2.33) | 0.71 (0.47, 1.05) | 0.232 | |
| 4 | 0.92 (0.64, 1.34) | 1.53* (1.02, 2.31) | 1.41 (0.93, 2.15) | 0.082 | |
| MEHHP | |||||
| 1 | 0.47*** (0.33, 0.68) | 1.44 (1.00, 2.09) | 0.68* (0.47, 0.99) | 0.064 | |
| 4 | 1.05 (0.73, 1.52) | 1.29 (0.87, 1.90) | 1.36 (0.89, 2.06) | 0.148 | |
| MEHP | |||||
| 1 | 0.78 (0.54, 1.14) | 0.94 (0.64, 1.38) | 0.73 (0.50, 1.09) | 0.122 | |
| 4 | 1.05 (0.74, 1.49) | 1.40 (0.93, 2.10) | 1.47 (0.98, 2.20) | 0.061 | |
| MEOHP | |||||
| 1 | 0.43*** (0.30, 0.62) | 1.92*** (1.34, 2.75) | 0.83 (0.59, 1.17) | 0.313 | |
| 4 | 1.07 (0.73, 1.55) | 1.30 (0.87, 1.95) | 1.39 (0.91, 2.12) | 0.120 | |
| MMP | |||||
| 1 | 1.31 (0.89, 1.93) | 0.82 (0.55, 1.22) | 1.07 (0.74, 1.56) | 0.672 | |
| 4 | 0.98 (0.68, 1.42) | 1.45* (1.01, 2.10) | 1.42* (1.02, 1.99) | 0.032* | |
aEstimating Tanner stage-specific association between biomarker and age of menarche adjusting BMI Z-score and maternal education, including an interaction between biomarker tertile and Tanner stage; restricted to subset of associations for which the interaction with Tanner stage was significant (p < 0.05)
bTrend evaluated by modeling the log(median) concentration within tertiles as a continuous variable
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Median menarcheal age (95% CI) between tertiles of EDC biomarker concentrations stratified by Tanner stage
Menarche hazard ratio (95% CI) associated with log(ng/ml) increase of biomarker stratified by BMI percentilea
| BMI Percentile | ||
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker | <85th | ≥85th |
| MEP | 1.02 (0.90, 1.17) | 1.24* (1.05, 1.47) |
| Triclosan | 0.93 (0.84, 1.02) | 1.16* (1.01, 1.34) |
aAccelerated failure time model adjusting for BMI Z-score and maternal education; restricted to subset of associations for which the interaction with BMI Z-score was significant (p < 0.05)
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Median menarcheal age (95% CI) between tertiles of EDC biomarker concentrations stratified by BMI percentile