| Literature DB >> 29614050 |
Junhui Guo1,2,3, Yun Zhao4, Xingpeng Jiang5, Rui Li6, Hao Xie7, Leixin Ge8, Bo Xie9, Xu Yang10, Luoping Zhang11.
Abstract
Exposure to Formaldehyde (FA) results in many pathophysiological symptoms, however the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Given the complicated modulatory role of intestinal microbiota on human health, we hypothesized that interactions between FA and the gut microbiome may account for FA's toxicity. Balb/c mice were allocated randomly to three groups: a control group, a methanol group (0.1 and 0.3 ng/mL MeOH subgroups), and an FA group (1 and 3 ng/mL FA subgroups). Groups of either three or six mice were used for the control or experiment. We applied high-throughput sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene approaches and investigated possible alterations in the composition of mouse gut microbiota induced by FA. Changes in bacterial genera induced by FA exposure were identified. By analyzing KEGG metabolic pathways predicted by PICRUSt software, we also explored the potential metabolic changes, such as alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism and pathways in cancer, associated with FA exposure in mice. To the best of our knowledge, this preliminary study is the first to identify changes in the mouse gut microbiome after FA exposure, and to analyze the relevant potential metabolisms. The limitation of this study: this study is relatively small and needs to be further confirmed through a larger study.Entities:
Keywords: 16s rRNA gene; formaldehyde (FA); gut microbiome; high-throughput; murine model
Year: 2018 PMID: 29614050 PMCID: PMC5924534 DOI: 10.3390/genes9040192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Richness (Operational taxonomic units, OTU number, Chao1) and diversity (Phylogenetic Diversity, PD) values for fecal-associated bacteria in the formaldehyde (FA) or MeOH treated mouse groups.
| Saline Control | 0.1 ng/mL MeOH | 0.3 ng/mL MeOH | 1.0 ng/mL FA | 3.0 ng/mL FA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTUs | 833.8 ± 33.7 | 892.7 ± 15.7 | 887.3 ± 26.6 | 881.6 ± 27.9 | 795.5 ± 69.5 | 0.046 |
| Chao1 | 929.2 ± 54.0 | 1011.8 ± 44.6 | 993.8 ± 35.6 | 1018.7 ± 21.0 | 915.3 ± 51.7 | 0.023 |
| PD | 35.8 ± 1.4 | 38.0 ± 0.5 | 37.9 ± 0.7 | 37.8 ± 1.0 | 35.4 ± 1.5 | 0.029 |
* Calculated by ANOVA test. The values are given as mean ± error. The OTUs were defined to have 97% sequence identity. Calculations were made based on rarefied OTU tables at 29,276 sequences from fecal samples.
Figure 1Fecal microbiota composition profiles at the phylum level (A), family level ((B), top 20 families with the most relative abundance were labeled) and genus level ((C), top 20 genera with the most relative abundance were labeled) in mice treated with different doses of MeOH or FA.
Figure 2Fecal bacterial patterns of FA-treated mice differentiated by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on a Bray-Curtis distance matrix. The patterns show the bacterial taxa community after treatment with different doses of FA or MeOH for 24 days.
Figure 3The relative abundance of bacterial community composition at the phylum level (A) and different phyla between untreated and FA treated mice detected by STAMP software [41] (B). In Panel (A) error bars are illustrated as standard deviations. In Panel (B) comparisons of the relative abundance of bacterial community composition were made between the 3 ng/mL FA group and the untreated group (top), between the 1 ng/mL FA group and the untreated group (middle), and between the 1 ng/mL group and the 3 ng/mL group (bottom). For each comparison, the mean proportion of phyla (left) and difference in mean proportions (right) were illustrated.
Figure 4Different genera between untreated and FA treated mice detected by STAMP software [41]. (A) Different genera between untreated and the 3.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. (B) Different genera between untreated and the 1.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. (C) Different genera between the 3.0 and the 1.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. (D) Different genera between untreated and the 0.3 ng/mL MeOH treated mice. (E) Different genera between untreated and the 0.1 ng/mL MeOH treated mice. For each comparison, the mean proportion of genera (left) and difference in mean proportions (right) were illustrated.
Figure 5Heatmap illustrations of gut bacterial taxa changes at phylum, family and genus levels. The heatmaps were constructed using the software HemI [39]. (A) Phylum; (B) Family; (C) Genus.
Figure 6Differential PICRUSt predicted KEGG pathways between untreated and FA treated mice detected by STAMP software [41]. (A) Differential KEGG pathways between untreated and the 3.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. (B) Differential KEGG pathways between untreated and the 1.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. (C) Differential KEGG pathways between the 3.0 and the 1.0 ng/mL FA treated mice. For each comparison, the mean proportion of predicted KEGG pathways (left) and difference in mean proportions (right) were illustrated.