Literature DB >> 21304694

Complete genome sequence of Olsenella uli type strain (VPI D76D-27C).

Markus Göker, Brittany Held, Susan Lucas, Matt Nolan, Montri Yasawong, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, David Bruce, John C Detter, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Manfred Rohde, Johannes Sikorski, Rüdiger Pukall, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Alla Lapidus.   

Abstract

Olsenella uli (Olsen et al. 1991) Dewhirst et al. 2001 is the type species of the genus Olsenella, which belongs to the actinobacterial family Coriobacteriaceae. The species is of interest because it is frequently isolated from dental plaque in periodontitis patients and can cause primary endodontic infection. The species is a Gram-positive, non-motile and non-sporulating bacterium. The strain described in this study was isolated from human gingival crevices. This is the first completed sequence of the genus Olsenella and the fifth sequence from a member of the family Coriobacteriaceae. The 2,051,896 bp long genome with its 1,795 protein-coding and 55 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coriobacteriaceae; GEBA; human gingival crevices; microaerotolerant anaerobe; primary endodontic infections

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304694      PMCID: PMC3035265          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1082860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain VPI D76D-27CT (= DSM 7084 = ATCC 49627 = JCM 12494) is the type strain of the species Olsenella uli, which is the type species of the genus Olsenella [1]. Currently, Olsenella is one out of thirteen genera in the family Coriobacteriaceae [2-4]. This strain was first described in 1991 by Olsen as ‘Lactobacillus uli’ [1]. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence and the presence of unique phenotypic characters, the strain was transferred to the new genus Olsenella as O. uli. A second novel species, O. profusa was also described [5]. More recently, a third species, ‘O. umbonata’, was described but is not yet validly published [6].The genus is named in honor of Ingar Olsen, a contemporary Norwegian microbiologist, who first described ‘L. uli’. The species epithet ‘uli’ means ‘of the gum’. Periradicular diseases are arguably among the most common human inflammatory diseases [7], which are often the result of microbial infection of the root canal [8]. Olsenella species, particularly O. uli, are common members of the microbiota associated with primary endodontic infection. O. uli has been found to predominate over other Gram-positive rods, (e.g., Atopobium parvulum) [9] in root canal samples taken after chemomechanical preparation and intracanal medication, suggesting that this species can resist intracanal disinfection measures and thus may be involved in persistent infections [10,11]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for O. uli VPI D76D-27CT, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Strains from the genus Olsenella are found in human oral cavity and likely in bovine rumen [1]. Strain VPI D76D-27CT was isolated from either human gingival crevices or periodontal pockets [1]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of VPI D76D-27CT is 97% identical to the cultivable strains N13-17 (AY880046) and S13-10 (AY880047). These strains were isolated from a 63-year old male patient with oral squamous-cell carcinoma [12]. Two other uncultured clone sequences with 100% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity to strain VPI D76D-27CT were reported at the Genbank database (status July 2010) [13]. These were clone OPEN_ROOT_17 (FJ982973), isolated from human root canal, and clone BS34 (AY244985) from cow rumen. The 16S rRNA gene of strain VPI D76D-27CT shares 96.7-96.8% sequence identity with the sequences of the type strains from the other members of the genus Olsenella [14], whereas the other type strains from the family Coriobacteriaceae share 87.3 to 96.7% sequence identity [14]. No phylotypes from environmental screenings or genomic surveys could be linked to the species O. uli or to the genus Olsenella, indicating a rather rare occurrence of these in the habitats screened thus far (as of July 2010). The cells of strain VPI D76D-27CT are nonmotile (Table 1), Gram-positive rods that occur singly, in pairs, and in short chains (Figure 1) [1]. The central part of the cell may swell; particularly when grown on solid medium. Strain VPI D76D-27CT is microaerotolerant to anaerobic [6] with an optimal growth temperature is 37°C [1]. Colonies on brain heart blood agar are one to two mm in diameter, raised or low convex, entire, and translucent to transparent after five days of anaerobic incubation at 37°C [1]. The cells are unable to grow on media with 6.5% w/v of NaCl. Growth is stimulated by Tween 80 (0.02% v/v) . Strain VPI D76D-27CT is able to ferment glycogen, trehalose and starch. Fermentation products from glucose are lactic, acetic, formic and occasionally trace amounts of succinic acid. Lactic acid is a major product of the strain VPI D76D-27CT [1], a feature which was suspected to be important in inflammatory processes of endodontic infections [1,19]. There is little or no gas detected in agar deeps during cell growth. Hydrogen and indole are not produced. Reactions are negative for bile-esculin, DNase and hippurate hydrolysis. This strain does not ferment amygdalin, erythriol, esculin, glycerol, inositol, mannitol, melezitose, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose, sorbitol and xylose. Acid is produced from fructose, glucose, maltose, mannose, salicin, and sucrose [1]. Strain VPI D76D-27CT does not liquefy gelatin, does not digest meat, does not produce indole, and does not reduce nitrate [1]. It is negative for bile-esculin, DNase, hippurate hydrolysis and catalase activity. However, strain VPI D76D-27CT hydrolyses esculin and produces ammonia from arginine [1].
Table 1

Classification and general features of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT according to the MIGS recommendations [15].

MIGS ID   Property   Term  Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria  TAS [16]
   Phylum Actinobacteria  TAS [17]
   Class Actinobacteria  TAS [3,4]
   Subclass Coriobacteridae  TAS [3,4]
   Order Coriobacteriales  TAS [3,4]
   Suborder Coriobacterineae  TAS [3,18]
   Family Coriobacteriaceae  TAS [3,4]
   Genus Olsenella  TAS [1,5]
   Type strain VPI D76D-27C  TAS [1,5]
   Gram stain   positive  TAS [1]
   Cell shape   small-elliptical rod that occur singly,   in pairs or short chains  TAS [1]
   Motility   none  TAS [1]
   Sporulation   none  TAS [1]
   Temperature range   37°C–45°C  NAS
   Optimum temperature   37°C  NAS
   Salinity   < 6.5% NaCl  TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   microaerotolerant anaerobic  TAS [6]
   Carbon source   glucose  TAS [1]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph  TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat   human gingival crevices  TAS [1,5]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free-living  NAS
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   primary endodontic infections  TAS [11,19,20]
   Biosafety level   2  TAS [21]
   Isolation   plaque from human gingival crevices  TAS [1]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   not reported
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1987 or before  TAS [1,5]
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   not reported
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   not reported
MIGS-4.3   Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [22]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Figure 1

Scanning electron micrograph of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [22]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements Scanning electron micrograph of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT

Chemotaxonomy

Strain VPI D76D-27CT possesses a peptidoglycan type of A4ß based on L-Orn-D-Asp [23]. The major cellular fatty acids of strain VPI D76D-27CT (FAME: fatty acid methyl ester; DMA: dimethylacetyl), when grown in peptone-yeast extract-glucose-Tween 80 broth, are C18:1 cis9 (32.1%, FAME), C18:1 (19.9%, DMA), C10:0 (10.1%, FAME), C17:1 cis8 (6.9%, FAME), C18:1 c11/t9/t6 (5.3%, FAME), C16:1 cis9 (4.8%, FAME), C16:0 (4.0%, DMA), C18:1 cis11 (3.6%, DMA), C14:0 (3.1%, FAME), C16:0 (2.8%, FAME) and C12:0 (2.6%, FAME) [1]. More recent data show a somewhat different fatty acid pattern, which is characterized by a large proportion of unbranched fatty acids (C18:0, 31-50%) and a quite large proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2 cis-9, cis-12; 5.6-8.4%). Presumably, this difference may be attributed to the different growth medium, which is described to be M2 liquid medium containing clarified rumen fluid [6]. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the unique 16S rRNA gene is identical with the previously published sequence generated from ATCC 49627 (AF292373).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT relative to the type strains within the genus and the type strains of the other genera within the family Coriobacteriaceae. The trees were inferred from 1,408 aligned characters [24,25] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [26] and as far as possible (note: Olsenella is paraphyletic in this tree) rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [27]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [28] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [29] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [30,31]. Adding the 16S rRNA sequence of the type strain of the not yet validly published species ‘Olsenella umbonata’ (FN178463) to the tree (data not shown) did not change the overall arrangement; ‘O. umbonata’ appeared within the grade between O. uli and O. profusa.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of O. uli VPI D76D-27CT relative to the type strains within the genus and the type strains of the other genera within the family Coriobacteriaceae. The trees were inferred from 1,408 aligned characters [24,25] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [26] and as far as possible (note: Olsenella is paraphyletic in this tree) rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [27]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [28] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [29] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [30,31]. Adding the 16S rRNA sequence of the type strain of the not yet validly published species ‘Olsenella umbonata’ (FN178463) to the tree (data not shown) did not change the overall arrangement; ‘O. umbonata’ appeared within the grade between O. uli and O. profusa.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [32], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [33]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [29] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property  Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality  Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used  Three genomic libraries: one 454 standard  and one 454 10 kb pyrosequence library;  one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms  454 GS Titanium, Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage  90.5× pyrosequence, 211.8× Illumina
MIGS-30   Assemblers  Newbler version 2.0.1-  PreRelease-03-30-2009-gcc-3.4.6-threads,   phrap, Velvet
MIGS-32   Gene calling method  Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID  CP002106
   Genbank Date of Release  August 6, 2010
   GOLD ID  Gc01331
   NCBI project ID  36641
   Database: IMG-GEBA  2502422319
MIGS-13   Source material identifier  DSM 7084
   Project relevance  Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

O. uli VPI D76D-27CT, DSM 3776, was grown in medium 104 (PYG modified medium) [34] at 37°C under strictly anaerobic conditions. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALM for cell lysis as described in [33].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of O. uli was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 434,617,748 bp, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 302 +/- 162.3 bp bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 9.273 +/- 2.318 kb were generated. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with VELVET, and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 2.0 Mb 454 draft data, and 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 149 contigs in 1 scaffold. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment [35] in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher [35], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 394 additional Sanger reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher [36], ). The error rate of the final genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [39].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,051,896 bp long chromosome with a 64.7% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 1,850 genes predicted, 1,795 were protein-coding genes, and 55 RNAs; fifty six pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.9%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute  Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)  2,051,896   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)  1,789,074   87.19%
DNA G+C content (bp)  1,327,526   64.70%
Number of replicons  1
Extrachromosomal elements  0
Total genes  1,850   100.00%
RNA genes  55   2.97%
rRNA operons  1
Protein-coding genes  1,795   97.03%
Pseudo genes  56   3.03%
Genes with function prediction  1,404   75.89%
Genes in paralog clusters  160   8.65%
Genes assigned to COGs  1,412   76.32%
Genes assigned Pfam domains  1,429   77.24%
Genes with signal peptides  320   17.30%
Genes with transmembrane helices  423   22.86%
CRISPR repeats  1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value   %age    Description
J   137   8.9    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0   0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   140   9.1    Transcription
L   82   5.3    Replication, recombination and repair
B   1   0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   17   1.1    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V   44   2.9    Defense mechanisms
T   72   4.7    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   86   5.6    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   0   0.0    Cell motility
Z   0   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U   18   1.2    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   51   3.3    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   75   4.9    Energy production and conversion
G   165   10.7    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   150   9.7    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   56   3.6    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   46   3.0    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   32   2.1    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   66   4.3    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   24   1.6    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   172   11.1    General function prediction only
S   112   7.2    Function unknown
-   438   23.7    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  32 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Uncultivated phylotypes and newly named species associated with primary and persistent endodontic infections.

Authors:  J F Siqueira; I N Rôças
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Identification of bacteria enduring endodontic treatment procedures by a combined reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and reverse-capture checkerboard approach.

Authors:  Isabela N Rôças; José F Siqueira
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet.

Authors:  J P Euzéby
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

6.  Viable bacteria present within oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue.

Authors:  Samuel J Hooper; St John Crean; Michael A O Lewis; David A Spratt; William G Wade; Melanie J Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Lactobacillus uli sp. nov. and Lactobacillus rimae sp. nov. from the human gingival crevice and emended descriptions of lactobacillus minutus and Streptococcus parvulus.

Authors:  I Olsen; J L Johnson; L V Moore; W E Moore
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1991-04

8.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Complete genome sequence of Eggerthella lenta type strain (IPP VPI 0255).

Authors:  Elizabeth Saunders; Rüdiger Pukall; Birte Abt; Alla Lapidus; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Alex Copeland; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Matt Nolan; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Patrick Chain; Linda Meincke; David Sims; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Cliff Han
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-09-28

10.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Axenic culture of a candidate division TM7 bacterium from the human oral cavity and biofilm interactions with other oral bacteria.

Authors:  Valeria Soro; Lindsay C Dutton; Susan V Sprague; Angela H Nobbs; Anthony J Ireland; Jonathan R Sandy; Mark A Jepson; Massimo Micaroni; Peter R Splatt; David Dymock; Howard F Jenkinson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Olsenella intestinalis sp. nov., isolated from cow feces.

Authors:  Yong Guan; Zhun Li; Min-Ju Kim; Jae-Young Lee; Hanna Choe; Seung-Hwan Park; Se Won Kang; Jiyoung Lee; Ju Huck Lee; Hyeun Bum Kim; Ju-Hoon Lee; Eunju Kim; Mi-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Pathogens and host immunity in the ancient human oral cavity.

Authors:  Christina Warinner; João F Matias Rodrigues; Rounak Vyas; Christian Trachsel; Natallia Shved; Jonas Grossmann; Anita Radini; Y Hancock; Raul Y Tito; Sarah Fiddyment; Camilla Speller; Jessica Hendy; Sophy Charlton; Hans Ulrich Luder; Domingo C Salazar-García; Elisabeth Eppler; Roger Seiler; Lars H Hansen; José Alfredo Samaniego Castruita; Simon Barkow-Oesterreicher; Kai Yik Teoh; Christian D Kelstrup; Jesper V Olsen; Paolo Nanni; Toshihisa Kawai; Eske Willerslev; Christian von Mering; Cecil M Lewis; Matthew J Collins; M Thomas P Gilbert; Frank Rühli; Enrico Cappellini
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Assessing the benefits of using mate-pairs to resolve repeats in de novo short-read prokaryotic assemblies.

Authors:  Joshua Wetzel; Carl Kingsford; Mihai Pop
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Metagenomic sequencing of bile from gallstone patients to identify different microbial community patterns and novel biliary bacteria.

Authors:  Hongzhang Shen; Fuqiang Ye; Lu Xie; Jianfeng Yang; Zhen Li; Peisong Xu; Fei Meng; Lei Li; Ying Chen; Xiaochen Bo; Ming Ni; Xiaofeng Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Khalid Elkarkouri; Romain Rivet; Carine Couderc; Didier Raoult; Pierre-Edouard Fournier
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-02-25

8.  Complete genome sequence of Coriobacterium glomerans type strain (PW2(T)) from the midgut of Pyrrhocoris apterus L. (red soldier bug).

Authors:  Erko Stackebrandt; Ahmet Zeytun; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Yun-Juan Chang; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Manfred Rohde; Rüdiger Pukall; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-04-15

9.  Draft Genome Sequence of Olsenella scatoligenes SK9K4T, a Producer of 3-Methylindole (Skatole) and 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol), Isolated from Pig Feces.

Authors:  Xiaoqiong Li; Ole Højberg; Samantha Joan Noel; Nuria Canibe; Bent Borg Jensen
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-02-25

10.  Oral health status in historic population: Macroscopic and metagenomic evidence.

Authors:  Claire Willmann; Xavier Mata; Kristian Hanghoej; Laure Tonasso; Lenka Tisseyre; Céline Jeziorski; Elodie Cabot; Pierre Chevet; Eric Crubézy; Ludovic Orlando; Rémi Esclassan; Catherine Thèves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.