BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of an entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibril-lator (S-ICD) represents an important progress in the defibrillation technology towards a less invasive approach. This is a single-center observational study of S-ICD implantations in Poland. METHODS: The S-ICD was implanted in 11 patients with standard indications for an ICD. Patients in whom the device was implanted were evaluated for adverse events and device function at hospital discharge. All hospitalization costs were calculated and summed up for all patients. Costs were divided into following categories: medical materials, pharmaceuticals, operating theatre staff, cardiology depart-ment staff, laboratory tests, non-laboratory tests and additional non-medical costs. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 16.4 years, 9 were men and 2 were women. Four pa-tients had atrial fibrillation as the basal rhythm, 1 patient had atrial flutter and 6 patients had sinus rhythm. All patients had at least one condition that precluded the use of a traditional ICD system or the S-ICD was preferred due to other conditions, i.e. a history complicated transvenous ICD therapy (18%), anticipated higher risk of infection (27%), lack or difficult vascular access (18%), young age and anticipated high cumulated risk of lifetime device therapy (36%). The mean duration of the im-plantation procedure was 2 h. One patient developed a postoperative pocket hematoma. Mean total time of hospitalization was 28 (6-92) days. Average cost of hospitalization per patient was 21,014.29 EUR (minimal = 19,332.71 EUR and maximal = 24,824.14 EUR). CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD implantation appears to provide a viable alternative to transvenous ICD, espe-cially for patients without pacing requirements.
BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of an entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibril-lator (S-ICD) represents an important progress in the defibrillation technology towards a less invasive approach. This is a single-center observational study of S-ICD implantations in Poland. METHODS: The S-ICD was implanted in 11 patients with standard indications for an ICD. Patients in whom the device was implanted were evaluated for adverse events and device function at hospital discharge. All hospitalization costs were calculated and summed up for all patients. Costs were divided into following categories: medical materials, pharmaceuticals, operating theatre staff, cardiology depart-ment staff, laboratory tests, non-laboratory tests and additional non-medical costs. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 16.4 years, 9 were men and 2 were women. Four pa-tients had atrial fibrillation as the basal rhythm, 1 patient had atrial flutter and 6 patients had sinus rhythm. All patients had at least one condition that precluded the use of a traditional ICD system or the S-ICD was preferred due to other conditions, i.e. a history complicated transvenous ICD therapy (18%), anticipated higher risk of infection (27%), lack or difficult vascular access (18%), young age and anticipated high cumulated risk of lifetime device therapy (36%). The mean duration of the im-plantation procedure was 2 h. One patient developed a postoperative pocket hematoma. Mean total time of hospitalization was 28 (6-92) days. Average cost of hospitalization per patient was 21,014.29 EUR (minimal = 19,332.71 EUR and maximal = 24,824.14 EUR). CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD implantation appears to provide a viable alternative to transvenous ICD, espe-cially for patients without pacing requirements.
Authors: Julian W E Jarman; Karen Lascelles; Tom Wong; Vias Markides; Jonathan R Clague; Janice Till Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Giulio Conte; Mihoko Kawabata; Carlo de Asmundis; Erika Taravelli; Francesco Petracca; Diego Ruggiero; Maria Luce Caputo; François Regoli; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Alessandra Chiodini; Alessandro Del Bufalo; Tiziano Moccetti; Masahiko Goya; Kenzo Hirao; Alessandro Vicentini; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Pedro Brugada; Angelo Auricchio Journal: Europace Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Amy J Brisben; Martin C Burke; Bradley P Knight; Stephen J Hahn; Keith L Herrmann; Venugopal Allavatam; Deepa Mahajan; Rick Sanghera; Michael R Gold Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-02-17
Authors: Kirsten M Kooiman; Reinoud E Knops; Louise Olde Nordkamp; Arthur A M Wilde; Joris R de Groot Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Julia Köbe; Florian Reinke; Christian Meyer; Dong-In Shin; Eimo Martens; Stefan Kääb; Andreas Löher; Susanne Amler; Artur Lichtenberg; Joachim Winter; Lars Eckardt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-09-29 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Silvia G Priori; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Andrea Mazzanti; Nico Blom; Martin Borggrefe; John Camm; Perry Mark Elliott; Donna Fitzsimons; Robert Hatala; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof; Keld Kjeldsen; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Antonio Hernandez-Madrid; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Tone M Norekvål; Christian Spaulding; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Piotr Wieniawski; Michał Buczyński; Marcin Grabowski; Joachim Winter; Bożena Werner Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Krzysztof Kaczmarek; Maciej Kempa; Marcin Grabowski; Mateusz Tajstra; Adam Sokal; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Radosław Zwoliński; Marcin Michalak; Michal Kowara; Szymon Budrejko; Anna Kurek; Jerzy K Wranicz; Grzegorz Raczak; Grzegorz Opolski; Mariusz Gąsior; Oskar Kowalski; Paweł Ptaszyński Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 3.318