Literature DB >> 28340026

High rate of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator sensing screening failure in patients with Brugada syndrome: a comparison with other inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes.

Giulio Conte1, Mihoko Kawabata2, Carlo de Asmundis3, Erika Taravelli4, Francesco Petracca1, Diego Ruggiero3, Maria Luce Caputo1, François Regoli1, Gian-Battista Chierchia3, Alessandra Chiodini1, Alessandro Del Bufalo1, Tiziano Moccetti1, Masahiko Goya2, Kenzo Hirao2, Alessandro Vicentini4, Gaetano M De Ferrari4, Pedro Brugada3, Angelo Auricchio1.   

Abstract

Aims: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) can avoid important complications associated with transvenous leads in patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes, who do not need pacing therapy. Few data are available on the percentage of patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes eligible for S-ICD implantation. Aim of this study was to analyse the eligibility for S-ICD in a series of patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS), and to compare it with patients with other channelopathies. Methods and results: Patients presenting with BrS, long-QT syndrome (LQTS), early repolarization syndrome (ERS), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) were considered eligible for this study. ECG screening was performed by analysis of QRS complex and T wave morphology recorded in standing and supine position. Eligibility was defined when ≥1 sense vector was acceptable in both supine and standing position. A total of 100 patients (72 males; mean age: 46 ± 17 years) underwent S-ICD sensing screening. Sixty-one patients presented with BrS, 21 with LQTS, 14 with IVF, and 4 with ERS. Thirty-four patients with BrS (56%) presented with spontaneous type 1 ECG. In the other 27 patients (44%), type 1 ECG was unmasked by ajmaline. Overall, rate of screening failure was 13%. Patients with BrS had a higher rate of inappropriate morphology analysis as compared with other channelopathies (18% vs. 5%, P = 0.07) and had a lower number of suitable sensing vectors (49.6% vs. 84.7% vs. P < 0.001). Ajmaline challenge unmasked sensing failure in 14.8% of drug-induced BrS patients previously considered eligible. In all patients, the reason for sensing inappropriateness was due to the presence of high T wave voltages.
Conclusion: S-ICD screening failure occurs in up to 13% of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Patients with BrS present a higher rate of screening failure as compared with other cardiac channelopathies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28340026     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

Review 1.  Subcutaneous and Transvenous ICDs: an Update on Contemporary Questions and Controversies.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Albert S Tully; Emily P Zeitler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Impact of SMART Pass filter in patients with ajmaline-induced Brugada syndrome and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator eligibility failure: results from a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Giulio Conte; Fabio Cattaneo; Carlo de Asmundis; Paola Berne; Alessandro Vicentini; Mehdi Namdar; Antonio Scalone; Catherine Klersy; Maria Luce Caputo; Andrea Demarchi; Tardu Özkartal; Francesca Salghetti; Gavino Casu; Ilaria Passarelli; Stefano Mameli; Dipen Shah; Haran Burri; Gaetano De Ferrari; Pedro Brugada; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.486

3.  Initial experience with the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with the real costs of hospitalization analysis in a single Polish center.

Authors:  Marcin Grabowski; Monika Gawałko; Marcin Michalak; Andrzej Cacko; Michał Kowara; Agnieszka Kołodzińska; Łukasz Januszkiewicz; Paweł Balsam; Laura Vitali Serdoz; Joachim Winter; Grzegorz Opolski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 4.  Pharmacological Therapy in Brugada Syndrome.

Authors:  Oholi Tovia Brodie; Yoav Michowitz; Bernard Belhassen
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-06

Review 5.  Assessing Candidacy for Primary Preventative Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators in Pediatric Patients with Ion Channelopathies: Weighing the Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Madeline L Townsend; Peter F Aziz
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-09-15

6.  Ventricular arrhythmia management in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Zain I Sharif; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

7.  Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes.

Authors:  Pier D Lambiase; Lars Eckardt; Dominic A Theuns; Timothy R Betts; Andreas L Kyriacou; Elizabeth Duffy; Reinoud Knops
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-10-28

8.  The potential impact of acute coronary syndromes on automatic sensing system in Subcutaneous-ICDs.

Authors:  M L Narducci; R Scacciavillani; G Pinnacchio; G Bencardino; F Perna; G Comerci; M Campisi; I Ceccarelli; C Pavone; F Spera; A Bisignani; F Crea; G Pelargonio
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-07-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.