Literature DB >> 29610384

Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target.

Douglas G MacMartin1, Katharine L Ricke2, David W Keith3.   

Abstract

Solar geoengineering refers to deliberately reducing net radiative forcing by reflecting some sunlight back to space, in order to reduce anthropogenic climate changes; a possible such approach would be adding aerosols to the stratosphere. If future mitigation proves insufficient to limit the rise in global mean temperature to less than 1.5°C above preindustrial, it is plausible that some additional and limited deployment of solar geoengineering could reduce climate damages. That is, these approaches could eventually be considered as part of an overall strategy to manage the risks of climate change, combining emissions reduction, net-negative emissions technologies and solar geoengineering to meet climate goals. We first provide a physical-science review of current research, research trends and some of the key gaps in knowledge that would need to be addressed to support informed decisions. Next, since few climate model simulations have considered these limited-deployment scenarios, we synthesize prior results to assess the projected response if solar geoengineering were used to limit global mean temperature to 1.5°C above preindustrial in an overshoot scenario that would otherwise peak near 3°C. While there are some important differences, the resulting climate is closer in many respects to a climate where the 1.5°C target is achieved through mitigation alone than either is to the 3°C climate with no geoengineering. This holds for both regional temperature and precipitation changes; indeed, there are no regions where a majority of models project that this moderate level of geoengineering would produce a statistically significant shift in precipitation further away from preindustrial levels.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  1.5; climate change; geoengineering

Year:  2018        PMID: 29610384      PMCID: PMC5897825          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Karen H Rosenlof; Robert W Portmann; John S Daniel; Sean M Davis; Todd J Sanford; Gian-Kasper Plattner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization.

Authors:  T M L Wigley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1).

Authors:  Roger Angel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle.

Authors:  G Bala; P B Duffy; K E Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change.

Authors:  Douglas G MacMartin; Ken Caldeira; David W Keith
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.

Authors:  Christopher B Field; Katharine J Mach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss.

Authors:  David W Keith; Debra K Weisenstein; John A Dykema; Frank N Keutsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.

Authors:  John A Dykema; David W Keith; James G Anderson; Debra Weisenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Field experiments on solar geoengineering: report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio.

Authors:  David W Keith; Riley Duren; Douglas G MacMartin
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Marine cloud brightening.

Authors:  John Latham; Keith Bower; Tom Choularton; Hugh Coe; Paul Connolly; Gary Cooper; Tim Craft; Jack Foster; Alan Gadian; Lee Galbraith; Hector Iacovides; David Johnston; Brian Launder; Brian Leslie; John Meyer; Armand Neukermans; Bob Ormond; Ben Parkes; Phillip Rasch; John Rush; Stephen Salter; Tom Stevenson; Hailong Wang; Qin Wang; Rob Wood
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  8 in total

1.  Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty.

Authors:  Anna Lou Abatayo; Valentina Bosetti; Marco Casari; Riccardo Ghidoni; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The myriad challenges of the Paris Agreement.

Authors:  Dann Mitchell; Myles R Allen; Jim W Hall; Benito Muller; Lavanya Rajamani; Corinne Le Quéré
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals.

Authors:  Jesse L Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 4.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Toward practical stratospheric aerosol albedo modification: Solar-powered lofting.

Authors:  Ru-Shan Gao; Karen H Rosenlof; Bernd Kärcher; Simone Tilmes; Owen B Toon; Christopher Maloney; Pengfei Yu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification.

Authors:  D G MacMartin; D Visioni; B Kravitz; J H Richter; T Felgenhauer; W R Lee; D R Morrow; E A Parson; M Sugiyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Potential for perceived failure of stratospheric aerosol injection deployment.

Authors:  Patrick W Keys; Elizabeth A Barnes; Noah S Diffenbaugh; James W Hurrell; Curtis M Bell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 8.  Towards legitimacy of the solar geoengineering research enterprise.

Authors:  Peter C Frumhoff; Jennie C Stephens
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.