Literature DB >> 27956628

Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss.

David W Keith1,2, Debra K Weisenstein3, John A Dykema3, Frank N Keutsch3,4.   

Abstract

Injecting sulfate aerosol into the stratosphere, the most frequently analyzed proposal for solar geoengineering, may reduce some climate risks, but it would also entail new risks, including ozone loss and heating of the lower tropical stratosphere, which, in turn, would increase water vapor concentration causing additional ozone loss and surface warming. We propose a method for stratospheric aerosol climate modification that uses a solid aerosol composed of alkaline metal salts that will convert hydrogen halides and nitric and sulfuric acids into stable salts to enable stratospheric geoengineering while reducing or reversing ozone depletion. Rather than minimizing reactive effects by reducing surface area using high refractive index materials, this method tailors the chemical reactivity. Specifically, we calculate that injection of calcite (CaCO3) aerosol particles might reduce net radiative forcing while simultaneously increasing column ozone toward its preanthropogenic baseline. A radiative forcing of -1 W⋅m-2, for example, might be achieved with a simultaneous 3.8% increase in column ozone using 2.1 Tg⋅y-1 of 275-nm radius calcite aerosol. Moreover, the radiative heating of the lower stratosphere would be roughly 10-fold less than if that same radiative forcing had been produced using sulfate aerosol. Although solar geoengineering cannot substitute for emissions cuts, it may supplement them by reducing some of the risks of climate change. Further research on this and similar methods could lead to reductions in risks and improved efficacy of solar geoengineering methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atmospheric chemistry; climate change; climate engineering; geoengineering; stratospheric ozone

Year:  2016        PMID: 27956628      PMCID: PMC5206531          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615572113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reactions on mineral dust.

Authors:  Courtney R Usher; Amy E Michel; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Uptake of CO2, SO2, HNO3 and HCl on calcite (CaCO3) at 300 K: mechanism and the role of adsorbed water.

Authors:  Ch Santschi; M J Rossi
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Reduced antarctic ozone depletions in a model with hydrocarbon injections.

Authors:  R J Cicerone; S Elliott; R P Turco
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes.

Authors:  Simone Tilmes; Rolf Müller; Ross Salawitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Facile Synthesis of Monodispersed Cubic and Spherical Calcite Nanoparticles in the Presence of Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide.

Authors:  Raji Atchudan; Hyon Bin Na; In Woo Cheong; Jin Jool
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-04

6.  Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases.

Authors:  R W Portmann; J S Daniel; A R Ravishankara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering.

Authors:  David W Keith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.

Authors:  John A Dykema; David W Keith; James G Anderson; Debra Weisenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target.

Authors:  Douglas G MacMartin; Katharine L Ricke; David W Keith
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals.

Authors:  Jesse L Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 3.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Ozone depletion due to dust release of iodine in the free troposphere.

Authors:  Theodore K Koenig; Rainer Volkamer; Eric C Apel; James F Bresch; Carlos A Cuevas; Barbara Dix; Edwin W Eloranta; Rafael P Fernandez; Samuel R Hall; Rebecca S Hornbrook; R Bradley Pierce; J Michael Reeves; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Kirk Ullmann
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification.

Authors:  D G MacMartin; D Visioni; B Kravitz; J H Richter; T Felgenhauer; W R Lee; D R Morrow; E A Parson; M Sugiyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Unanticipated Side Effects of Stratospheric Albedo Modification Proposals Due to Aerosol Composition and Phase.

Authors:  Daniel J Cziczo; Martin J Wolf; Blaž Gasparini; Steffen Münch; Ulrike Lohmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.