Literature DB >> 17085589

Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1).

Roger Angel1.   

Abstract

If it were to become apparent that dangerous changes in global climate were inevitable, despite greenhouse gas controls, active methods to cool the Earth on an emergency basis might be desirable. The concept considered here is to block 1.8% of the solar flux with a space sunshade orbited near the inner Lagrange point (L1), in-line between the Earth and sun. Following the work of J. Early [Early, JT (1989) J Br Interplanet Soc 42:567-569], transparent material would be used to deflect the sunlight, rather than to absorb it, to minimize the shift in balance out from L1 caused by radiation pressure. Three advances aimed at practical implementation are presented. First is an optical design for a very thin refractive screen with low reflectivity, leading to a total sunshade mass of approximately 20 million tons. Second is a concept aimed at reducing transportation cost to 50 dollars/kg by using electromagnetic acceleration to escape Earth's gravity, followed by ion propulsion. Third is an implementation of the sunshade as a cloud of many spacecraft, autonomously stabilized by modulating solar radiation pressure. These meter-sized "flyers" would be assembled completely before launch, avoiding any need for construction or unfolding in space. They would weigh a gram each, be launched in stacks of 800,000, and remain for a projected lifetime of 50 years within a 100,000-km-long cloud. The concept builds on existing technologies. It seems feasible that it could be developed and deployed in approximately 25 years at a cost of a few trillion dollars, <0.5% of world gross domestic product (GDP) over that time.

Year:  2006        PMID: 17085589      PMCID: PMC1859907          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608163103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet.

Authors:  Martin I Hoffert; Ken Caldeira; Gregory Benford; David R Criswell; Christopher Green; Howard Herzog; Atul K Jain; Haroon S Kheshgi; Klaus S Lackner; John S Lewis; H Douglas Lightfoot; Wallace Manheimer; John C Mankins; Michael E Mauel; L John Perkins; Michael E Schlesinger; Tyler Volk; Tom M L Wigley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth.

Authors:  P Brown; R E Spalding; D O ReVelle; E Tagliaferri; S P Worden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases.

Authors:  D A Stainforth; T Aina; C Christensen; M Collins; N Faull; D J Frame; J A Kettleborough; S Knight; A Martin; J M Murphy; C Piani; D Sexton; L A Smith; R A Spicer; A J Thorpe; M R Allen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Geoengineering: the good, the MAD, and the sensible.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle.

Authors:  G Bala; P B Duffy; K E Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget.

Authors:  John Latham; Philip J Rasch; Brian Launder
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target.

Authors:  Douglas G MacMartin; Katharine L Ricke; David W Keith
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering.

Authors:  David W Keith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise.

Authors:  J C Moore; S Jevrejeva; A Grinsted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Optimal Sunshade Configurations for Space-Based Geoengineering near the Sun-Earth L1 Point.

Authors:  Joan-Pau Sánchez; Colin R McInnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.