Literature DB >> 29604882

Inferring properties of disordered chains from FRET transfer efficiencies.

Wenwei Zheng1, Gül H Zerze2, Alessandro Borgia3, Jeetain Mittal2, Benjamin Schuler3, Robert B Best1.   

Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a powerful tool for elucidating both structural and dynamic properties of unfolded or disordered biomolecules, especially in single-molecule experiments. However, the key observables, namely, the mean transfer efficiency and fluorescence lifetimes of the donor and acceptor chromophores, are averaged over a broad distribution of donor-acceptor distances. The inferred average properties of the ensemble therefore depend on the form of the model distribution chosen to describe the distance, as has been widely recognized. In addition, while the distribution for one type of polymer model may be appropriate for a chain under a given set of physico-chemical conditions, it may not be suitable for the same chain in a different environment so that even an apparently consistent application of the same model over all conditions may distort the apparent changes in chain dimensions with variation of temperature or solution composition. Here, we present an alternative and straightforward approach to determining ensemble properties from FRET data, in which the polymer scaling exponent is allowed to vary with solution conditions. In its simplest form, it requires either the mean FRET efficiency or fluorescence lifetime information. In order to test the accuracy of the method, we have utilized both synthetic FRET data from implicit and explicit solvent simulations for 30 different protein sequences, and experimental single-molecule FRET data for an intrinsically disordered and a denatured protein. In all cases, we find that the inferred radii of gyration are within 10% of the true values, thus providing higher accuracy than simpler polymer models. In addition, the scaling exponents obtained by our procedure are in good agreement with those determined directly from the molecular ensemble. Our approach can in principle be generalized to treating other ensemble-averaged functions of intramolecular distances from experimental data.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604882      PMCID: PMC5812746          DOI: 10.1063/1.5006954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  64 in total

1.  Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators.

Authors:  Stephen J Demarest; Maria Martinez-Yamout; John Chung; Hongwu Chen; Wei Xu; H Jane Dyson; Ronald M Evans; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Random-coil behavior and the dimensions of chemically unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kohn; Ian S Millett; Jaby Jacob; Bojan Zagrovic; Thomas M Dillon; Nikolina Cingel; Robin S Dothager; Soenke Seifert; P Thiyagarajan; Tobin R Sosnick; M Zahid Hasan; Vijay S Pande; Ingo Ruczinski; Sebastian Doniach; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inferential structure determination.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rieping; Michael Habeck; Michael Nilges
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Toward an accurate theoretical framework for describing ensembles for proteins under strongly denaturing conditions.

Authors:  Hoang T Tran; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantitative interpretation of FRET experiments via molecular simulation: force field and validation.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Hagen Hofmann; Daniel Nettels; Benjamin Schuler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Modest influence of FRET chromophores on the properties of unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Gül H Zerze; Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Kiersten M Ruff; Alex S Holehouse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Hybrid Approaches to Structural Characterization of Conformational Ensembles of Complex Macromolecular Systems Combining NMR Residual Dipolar Couplings and Solution X-ray Scattering.

Authors:  Vincenzo Venditti; Timothy K Egner; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Kusai A Merchant; Irina V Gopich; Benjamin Schuler; Ad Bax; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  ALS Mutations Disrupt Phase Separation Mediated by α-Helical Structure in the TDP-43 Low-Complexity C-Terminal Domain.

Authors:  Alexander E Conicella; Gül H Zerze; Jeetain Mittal; Nicolas L Fawzi
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  30 in total

1.  A Unified De Novo Approach for Predicting the Structures of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  John J Ferrie; E James Petersson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Commonly used FRET fluorophores promote collapse of an otherwise disordered protein.

Authors:  Joshua A Riback; Micayla A Bowman; Adam M Zmyslowski; Kevin W Plaxco; Patricia L Clark; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Relation between single-molecule properties and phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Gregory L Dignon; Wenwei Zheng; Robert B Best; Young C Kim; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An Extended Guinier Analysis for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Wenwei Zheng; Robert B Best
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Accurate Transfer Efficiencies, Distance Distributions, and Ensembles of Unfolded and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins From Single-Molecule FRET.

Authors:  Erik D Holmstrom; Andrea Holla; Wenwei Zheng; Daniel Nettels; Robert B Best; Benjamin Schuler
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 6.  Emerging consensus on the collapse of unfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins in water.

Authors:  Robert B Best
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Biomolecular Phase Separation: From Molecular Driving Forces to Macroscopic Properties.

Authors:  Gregory L Dignon; Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 12.703

8.  PAGE4 and Conformational Switching: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Implications for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lin; Susmita Roy; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Federico Bocci; Nicholas P Schafer; Min-Yeh Tsai; Yihong Chen; Yanan He; Alexander Grishaev; Keith Weninger; John Orban; Prakash Kulkarni; Govindan Rangarajan; Herbert Levine; José N Onuchic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Hydropathy Patterning Complements Charge Patterning to Describe Conformational Preferences of Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Wenwei Zheng; Gregory Dignon; Matthew Brown; Young C Kim; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 10.  Water as a Good Solvent for Unfolded Proteins: Folding and Collapse are Fundamentally Different.

Authors:  Patricia L Clark; Kevin W Plaxco; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.