Literature DB >> 29603929

Perceptual resolution of color for multiple chromatically ambiguous objects.

Emily Slezak, Steven K Shevell.   

Abstract

In a classic study, Kovács et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93, 15508 (1996)PNASA60027-842410.1073/pnas.93.26.15508] used an array of many disks presented dichoptically with half of the disks in one eye "red" and the other half "green;" disk chromaticities in the fellow eye were reversed, resulting in binocular color rivalry for every disk, thus creating color ambiguity. Surprisingly, the binocularly fused percept sometimes was all disks of the same color (red or green), which showed that perceptual resolution of the many ambiguous neural representations did not rely completely on monocular dominance or on independent resolution for each disk. The present study replicates and expands on the original with the aim to isolate binocularly driven neural mechanisms of perceptual resolution without contamination from monocular dominance. Observers viewed a color-rivalrous array with 16 disks presented either steadily to each eye, as in Kovács et al., or with chromatic interocular-switch rivalry (CISR), which swaps the two images between the eyes every 133 ms. The total proportion of viewing time when the 16 disks were perceived to be all red or all green was measured. For three observers, the disks all appeared the same color more often with CISR than with steady rivalrous presentation, suggesting that monocular dominance interferes with grouped perceptual resolution of ambiguous stimuli in the Kovács paradigm. This conclusion was supported by an additional condition using CISR, but with every disk the same color in one eye at each instant (e.g., all "red" disks in one eye and all "green" in the other). This condition was never significantly different from the original CISR condition, as expected if CISR reveals only binocularly mediated perceptual resolution of the disks' color, irrespective of monocular neural representations. In conclusion, chromatically tuned binocularly driven neurons account for perceptual resolution of CISR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603929      PMCID: PMC6022830          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.000B85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  21 in total

1.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Dichoptic difference thresholds for chromatic stimuli.

Authors:  Gokhan Malkoc; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dichoptic colour-saturation masking is unmasked by binocular luminance contrast.

Authors:  Frederick A A Kingdom; Danni Wang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Observations on binocular fusion and rivalry.

Authors:  R S Creed
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1935-07-24       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance.

Authors:  D I MacLeod; R M Boynton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-08

10.  Independent binocular integration for form and colour.

Authors:  David J Holmes; Sarah Hancock; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  8 in total

1.  Ambiguous chromatic neural representations: Perceptual resolution by grouping.

Authors:  Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-07

2.  Ambiguity is a linking feature for interocular grouping.

Authors:  Sunny M Lee; Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Does feature integration affect resolution of multiple simultaneous forms of ambiguity?

Authors:  Ryan Lange; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Seeing fruit on trees: enhanced perceptual dissimilarity from multiple ambiguous neural representations.

Authors:  Jaelyn R Peiso; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 6.  The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.745

7.  Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Andrew J Coia; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Conflict defined by global gestalt can modulate binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Parker Cuthbert; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.