Literature DB >> 32400522

Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.

Emily Slezak, Steven K Shevell.   

Abstract

Multiple regions, each with the same ambiguous chromatic neural representation, are resolved to have the identical perceived color more often than chance [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93, 15508 (1996)PNASA60027-842410.1073/pnas.93.26.15508; J. Opt. Soc. Am. A35, B85 (2018)JOAOD60740-323210.1364/JOSAA.35.000B85]. This reveals that the regions are grouped, but it is unclear whether they are grouped because each one has the identical competing representations of the same stimuli (that is, the same chromaticities) or, alternatively, identical competing representations of the same colors one sees. The current study uses chromatic induction, as in Nat. Neurosci.6, 801 (2003)NANEFN1097-625610.1038/nn1099, to disentangle whether grouping depends on identical (though ambiguous) stimulus chromaticities or on perceived colors, by (1) inducing one chromaticity to appear in two different colors or (2) inducing two different chromaticities to appear in the same color. All stimuli were equiluminant gratings with chromatic inducing and test fields. Three observers were tested, first completing color matches to measure induced color-appearance shifts and second completing grouping measurements using interocular-switch rivalry, a method with rivalrous dichoptic images swapped between the eyes at 3.75 Hz [J. Vis.17, 9 (2017)1534-736210.1167/17.5.9]. Each of two separate areas, one above and one below fixation, had dichoptic rivalry. The two sets of regions had either identical or different chromaticities that could appear either as the same color or not. Observers reported their percepts when both areas above and below fixation were grouped by color or by chromaticity (or neither in an additional experimental condition). All conditions showed significant groupings for every observer, including when neither color nor chromaticity was identical in a "group." Moreover, there was never a significant effect of chromaticity versus color for any observer. This is the result expected if neither color nor chromaticity must match between two regions in order for them to be grouped and suggests that, instead, some other feature drives grouping.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32400522      PMCID: PMC8684354          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.381132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  26 in total

1.  Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  D Alais; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Time course of perceptual grouping by color.

Authors:  Melissa F Schulz; Thomas Sanocki
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-01

3.  Binocular rivalry of achromatic colors.

Authors:  H WALLACH; P A ADAMS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-09

4.  Grouping based on phenomenal similarity of achromatic color.

Authors:  I Rock; R Nijhawan; S Palmer; L Tudor
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance.

Authors:  D I MacLeod; R M Boynton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-08

7.  Theory of brightness and color contrast in human vision.

Authors:  D Jameson; L M Hurvich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?

Authors:  Sjoerd M Stuit; Chris L E Paffen; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Onset rivalry: the initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations.

Authors:  Jody Stanley; Jason D Forte; Patrick Cavanagh; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Andrew J Coia; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.