Literature DB >> 22633499

Needs assessment for an errors-based curriculum on thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Shari L Meyerson1, Betty C Tong, Stafford S Balderson, Thomas A D'Amico, Joseph D Phillips, Malcolm M DeCamp, Debra A DaRosa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research suggests a benefit from a skills curriculum emphasizing error prevention, identification, and management. Our purpose was to identify common errors committed by trainees during simulated thoracoscopic lobectomy for use in developing an error-based curriculum.
METHODS: Twenty-one residents (postgraduate years 1 to 8) performed a thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy on a previously validated simulator. Videos of the procedure were reviewed in a blinded fashion using a checklist listing 66 possible cognitive and technical errors.
RESULTS: Of the 21 residents, 15 (71%) self-reported completing the anatomic lobectomy; however, only 7 (33%) had actually divided all of the necessary structures correctly. While dissecting the superior pulmonary vein, 16 residents (76%) made at least one error. The most common (n=13, 62%) was dissecting individual branches rather than the entire vein. On the bronchus, 14 (67%) made at least one error. Again, the most common (n=9, 43%) was dissecting branches. During these tasks, cognitive errors were more common than technical errors. While dissecting arterial branches, 18 residents (86%) made at least one error. Technical and cognitive errors occurred with equal frequency during arterial dissection. The most common arterial error was excess tension on the vessel (n=10, 48%).
CONCLUSIONS: Curriculum developers should identify skill-specific technical and judgment errors to verify the scope of errors typically committed. For a thoracoscopic lobectomy curriculum, emphasis should be placed on correct identification of anatomic landmarks during dissection of the vein and airway and on proper tissue handling technique during arterial dissection.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633499      PMCID: PMC4089861          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  12 in total

1.  A role for error training in surgical technical skill instruction and evaluation.

Authors:  David A Rogers; Glenn Regehr; Jeannie MacDonald
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors.

Authors:  Jiajie Zhang; Vimla L Patel; Todd R Johnson; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Julie A Kohls-Gatzoulis; Glenn Regehr; Carol Hutchison
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The use of cognitive task analysis to improve instructional descriptions of procedures.

Authors:  Richard E Clark; Carla M Pugh; Kenneth A Yates; Kenji Inaba; Donald J Green; Maura E Sullivan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  A novel approach to minimize error in the medical domain: cognitive neuroscientific insights into training.

Authors:  Itiel Dror
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Surgical skill is predicted by the ability to detect errors.

Authors:  Simon Bann; Mansoor Khan; Vivek Datta; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  An inexpensive, reproducible tissue simulator for teaching thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Shari L Meyerson; Frank LoCascio; Stafford Scott Balderson; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Cognitive training improves clinically relevant outcomes during simulated endovascular procedures.

Authors:  Isabelle Van Herzeele; Rajesh Aggarwal; Simon Neequaye; Ara Darzi; Frank Vermassen; Nicholas J Cheshire
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Wrong-site surgery: can we prevent it?

Authors:  John R Clarke; Janet Johnston; Mary Blanco; Denise P Martindell
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2008

10.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  A novel assessment tool for evaluating competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen; William Walker; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  How I Teach a Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

Authors:  Brittany A Zwischenberger; Thomas A D'Amico; Betty C Tong
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Using virtual reality simulation to assess competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Flemming Bjerrum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy-results from 120 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Liu; Xiaosang Chen; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.