Georgina V Long1, Victoria Atkinson2, Serigne Lo3, Shahneen Sandhu4, Alexander D Guminski5, Michael P Brown6, James S Wilmott3, Jarem Edwards3, Maria Gonzalez3, Richard A Scolyer7, Alexander M Menzies5, Grant A McArthur8. 1. Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: georgina.long@sydney.edu.au. 2. Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 3. Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6. Royal Adelaide Hospital, Centre for Cancer Biology (SA Pathology and University of South Australia) and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 7. Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. 8. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Medical, Dental and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Nivolumab monotherapy and combination nivolumab plusipilimumab increase proportions of patients achieving a response and survival versus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma; however, efficacy in active brain metastases is unknown. We aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with active melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: This multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 trial was done at four sites in Australia, in three cohorts of immunotherapy-naive patients aged 18 years or older with melanoma brain metastases. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with no previous local brain therapy were randomly assigned using the biased coin minimisation method, stratified by site, in a 30:24 ratio (after a safety run-in of six patients) to cohort A (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) or cohort B (nivolumab). Patients with brain metastases in whom local therapy had failed, or who had neurological symptoms, or leptomeningeal disease were enrolled in non-randomised cohort C (nivolumab). Patients in cohort A received intravenous nivolumab 1 mg/kg combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks; patients in cohort B or cohort C received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was intracranial response from week 12. Primary and safety analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02374242, and is ongoing for the final survival analysis. FINDINGS:Between Nov 4, 2014, and April 21, 2017, 79 patients were enrolled; 36 in cohort A, 27 in cohort B, and 16 in cohort C. One patient in cohort A and two in cohort B were found to be ineligible and excluded from the study before receiving the study drug. At the data cutoff (Aug 28, 2017), with a median follow up of 17 months (IQR 8-25), intracranial responses were achieved by 16 (46%; 95% CI 29-63) of 35 patients in cohort A, five (20%; 7-41) of 25 in cohort B, and one (6%; 0-30) of 16 in cohort C. Intracranial complete responses occurred in six (17%) patients in cohort A, three (12%) in cohort B, and none in cohort C. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34 (97%) of 35 patients in cohort A, 17 (68%) of 25 in cohort B, and eight (50%) of 16 in cohort C. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (54%) patients in cohort A, four (16%) in cohort B, and two (13%) in cohort C. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy are active in melanoma brain metastases. A high proportion of patients achieved an intracranial response with the combination. Thus, nivolumab combined with ipilimumab should be considered as a first-line therapy for patients with asymptomatic untreated brain metastases. FUNDING: Melanoma Institute Australia and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Nivolumab monotherapy and combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab increase proportions of patients achieving a response and survival versus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma; however, efficacy in active brain metastases is unknown. We aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with active melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: This multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 trial was done at four sites in Australia, in three cohorts of immunotherapy-naive patients aged 18 years or older with melanoma brain metastases. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with no previous local brain therapy were randomly assigned using the biased coin minimisation method, stratified by site, in a 30:24 ratio (after a safety run-in of six patients) to cohort A (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) or cohort B (nivolumab). Patients with brain metastases in whom local therapy had failed, or who had neurological symptoms, or leptomeningeal disease were enrolled in non-randomised cohort C (nivolumab). Patients in cohort A received intravenous nivolumab 1 mg/kg combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks; patients in cohort B or cohort C received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was intracranial response from week 12. Primary and safety analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02374242, and is ongoing for the final survival analysis. FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2014, and April 21, 2017, 79 patients were enrolled; 36 in cohort A, 27 in cohort B, and 16 in cohort C. One patient in cohort A and two in cohort B were found to be ineligible and excluded from the study before receiving the study drug. At the data cutoff (Aug 28, 2017), with a median follow up of 17 months (IQR 8-25), intracranial responses were achieved by 16 (46%; 95% CI 29-63) of 35 patients in cohort A, five (20%; 7-41) of 25 in cohort B, and one (6%; 0-30) of 16 in cohort C. Intracranial complete responses occurred in six (17%) patients in cohort A, three (12%) in cohort B, and none in cohort C. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34 (97%) of 35 patients in cohort A, 17 (68%) of 25 in cohort B, and eight (50%) of 16 in cohort C. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (54%) patients in cohort A, four (16%) in cohort B, and two (13%) in cohort C. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy are active in melanoma brain metastases. A high proportion of patients achieved an intracranial response with the combination. Thus, nivolumab combined with ipilimumab should be considered as a first-line therapy for patients with asymptomatic untreated brain metastases. FUNDING: Melanoma Institute Australia and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Authors: Emilio Sanseviero; Erin M O'Brien; Jenna R Karras; Tamer B Shabaneh; Bulent Arman Aksoy; Wei Xu; Cathy Zheng; Xiangfan Yin; Xiaowei Xu; Giorgos C Karakousis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Brian Nam; Mary Jo Turk; Jeff Hammerbacher; Mark P Rubinstein; Lynn M Schuchter; Tara C Mitchell; Qin Liu; Erica L Stone Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Harriet M Kluger; Veronica Chiang; Amit Mahajan; Christopher R Zito; Mario Sznol; Thuy Tran; Sarah A Weiss; Justine V Cohen; James Yu; Upendra Hegde; Elizabeth Perrotti; Gail Anderson; Amanda Ralabate; Yuval Kluger; Wei Wei; Sarah B Goldberg; Lucia B Jilaveanu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Duncan Berry; David H Abramson; Christopher A Barker; Chris Bergstrom; Hakan Demirci; Michael Engelbert; Hans Grossniklaus; Baker Hubbard; Codrin E Iacob; Korey Jaben; Madhavi Kurli; Michael A Postow; Jedd D Wolchok; Ivana K Kim; Jill R Wells Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ines Pires da Silva; Isabella C Glitza; Lauren E Haydu; Romany Johnpulle; Patricia D Banks; George D Grass; Simone M A Goldinger; Jessica L Smith; Ashlyn S Everett; Peter Koelblinger; Rachel Roberts-Thomson; Michael Millward; Victoria G Atkinson; Alexander Guminski; Rony Kapoor; Robert M Conry; Matteo S Carlino; Wei Wang; Mark J Shackleton; Zeynep Eroglu; Serigne Lo; Angela M Hong; Georgina V Long; Douglas B Johnson; Alexander M Menzies Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2019-03-03 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Hani M Babiker; Sara A Byron; William P D Hendricks; William F Elmquist; Gautham Gampa; Jessica Vondrak; Jessica Aldrich; Lori Cuyugan; Jonathan Adkins; Valerie De Luca; Raoul Tibes; Mitesh J Borad; Katie Marceau; Thomas J Myers; Linda J Paradiso; Winnie S Liang; Ronald L Korn; Derek Cridebring; Daniel D Von Hoff; John D Carpten; David W Craig; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael S Gordon Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Yang Wang; Bin Lian; Lu Si; ZhiHong Chi; XiNan Sheng; Xuan Wang; LiLi Mao; BiXia Tang; SiMing Li; XieQiao Yan; Xue Bai; Li Zhou; ChuanLiang Cui; Jun Guo Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell H Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; Yi An; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544