Yang Wang1, Bin Lian1, Lu Si1, ZhiHong Chi1, XiNan Sheng1, Xuan Wang1, LiLi Mao1, BiXia Tang1, SiMing Li1, XieQiao Yan1, Xue Bai1, Li Zhou1, ChuanLiang Cui2, Jun Guo3. 1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China. 1008ccl@163.com. 3. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China. guoj307@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to establish the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in the East Asian population. METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analyses were used to determine prognostic factors associated with intracranial PFS and OS. RESULTS: Between July 2007 and December 2019, 431 patients diagnosed with MBM were enrolled. Mucosal subtype (p = 0.013), LDH level (p = 0.014), the number of MBM ≥ 4 (p = 0.02), local treatment (p < 0.0001) and the use of PD-1 inhibitors (p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for intracranial PFS. Mucosal subtype (p = 0.022), LDH level (p = 0.005), no extracranial metastasis (p = 0.01), concurrent liver metastasis (p = 0.004), local treatment (p = 0.001) and the use of PD-1 inhibitors (p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Mucosal subtype brain metastases had a poor response to PD-1 inhibitors (p = 0.007), with a shorter intracranial PFS than other subtypes. In BRAF mutation patients with MBM, the first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy group had an advantage in OS compared to the first-line anti-PD-1 therapy group (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings depict clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of MBM in the East Asian population, suggesting the mucosal subtype as an adverse prognostic and predictive factor for patients with MBM. For BRAF mutation patients with MBM, first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy may bring a potential survival benefit compared to first-line anti-PD-1 therapy.
PURPOSE: We aimed to establish the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in the East Asian population. METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analyses were used to determine prognostic factors associated with intracranial PFS and OS. RESULTS: Between July 2007 and December 2019, 431 patients diagnosed with MBM were enrolled. Mucosal subtype (p = 0.013), LDH level (p = 0.014), the number of MBM ≥ 4 (p = 0.02), local treatment (p < 0.0001) and the use of PD-1 inhibitors (p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for intracranial PFS. Mucosal subtype (p = 0.022), LDH level (p = 0.005), no extracranial metastasis (p = 0.01), concurrent liver metastasis (p = 0.004), local treatment (p = 0.001) and the use of PD-1 inhibitors (p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Mucosal subtype brain metastases had a poor response to PD-1 inhibitors (p = 0.007), with a shorter intracranial PFS than other subtypes. In BRAF mutation patients with MBM, the first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy group had an advantage in OS compared to the first-line anti-PD-1 therapy group (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings depict clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of MBM in the East Asian population, suggesting the mucosal subtype as an adverse prognostic and predictive factor for patients with MBM. For BRAF mutation patients with MBM, first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy may bring a potential survival benefit compared to first-line anti-PD-1 therapy.
Authors: John A Curtin; Jane Fridlyand; Toshiro Kageshita; Hetal N Patel; Klaus J Busam; Heinz Kutzner; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Setsuya Aiba; Eva-Bettina Bröcker; Philip E LeBoit; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ahmed Alomari; Philipp J Rauch; Maria Orsaria; Frank J Minja; Veronica L Chiang; Alexander O Vortmeyer Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Xue Bai; Yan Kong; Zhihong Chi; Xinan Sheng; Chuanliang Cui; Xuan Wang; Lili Mao; Bixia Tang; Siming Li; Bin Lian; Xieqiao Yan; Li Zhou; Jie Dai; Jun Guo; Lu Si Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: K A Ahmed; Y A Abuodeh; M I Echevarria; J A Arrington; D G Stallworth; C Hogue; A O Naghavi; S Kim; Y Kim; B G Patel; S Sarangkasiri; P A S Johnstone; S Sahebjam; N I Khushalani; P A Forsyth; L B Harrison; M Yu; A B Etame; J J Caudell Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Roberta Turiello; Mariaelena Capone; Diana Giannarelli; Elva Morretta; Maria Chiara Monti; Gabriele Madonna; Domenico Mallardo; Lucia Festino; Rosa Azzaro; Mitchell P Levesque; Laurence Imhof; Benjamin Weide; Teresa Amaral; Marc Chevrier; Antje Sucker; Piotr Rutkowski; Dirk Schadendorf; Celeste Lebbe; Jason John Luke; Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht; Reinhard Dummer; Aldo Pinto; Silvana Morello; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Sebastian Rubino; Daniel E Oliver; Nam D Tran; Michael A Vogelbaum; Peter A Forsyth; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Kamran Ahmed; Arnold B Etame Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 6.244