Literature DB >> 29601065

DeepScope: Nonintrusive Whole Slide Saliency Annotation and Prediction from Pathologists at the Microscope.

Andrew J Schaumberg1,2, S Joseph Sirintrapun3, Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie3, Peter J Schüffler4, Thomas J Fuchs2,3,4.   

Abstract

Modern digital pathology departments have grown to produce whole-slide image data at petabyte scale, an unprecedented treasure chest for medical machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, most digital slides are not annotated at the image level, hindering large-scale application of supervised learning. Manual labeling is prohibitive, requiring pathologists with decades of training and outstanding clinical service responsibilities. This problem is further aggravated by the United States Food and Drug Administration's ruling that primary diagnosis must come from a glass slide rather than a digital image. We present the first end-to-end framework to overcome this problem, gathering annotations in a nonintrusive manner during a pathologist's routine clinical work: (i) microscope-specific 3D-printed commodity camera mounts are used to video record the glass-slide-based clinical diagnosis process; (ii) after routine scanning of the whole slide, the video frames are registered to the digital slide; (iii) motion and observation time are estimated to generate a spatial and temporal saliency map of the whole slide. Demonstrating the utility of these annotations, we train a convolutional neural network that detects diagnosis-relevant salient regions, then report accuracy of 85.15% in bladder and 91.40% in prostate, with 75.00% accuracy when training on prostate but predicting in bladder, despite different pathologists examining the different tissues. When training on one patient but testing on another, AUROC in bladder is 0.79±0.11 and in prostate is 0.96±0.04. Our tool is available at https://bitbucket.org/aschaumberg/deepscope.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29601065      PMCID: PMC5870882          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67834-4_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Intell Methods Bioinform Biostat (2016)


  12 in total

1.  Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Allison A Tillack; Lynne Richter; Jeffrey T Henderson; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Katherine M Scott; Anna R Graham; Michael R Descour; John R Davis; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Visual positioning of previously defined ROIs on microscopic slides.

Authors:  Grigory Begelman; Michael Lifshits; Ehud Rivlin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-01

3.  Computational pathology: challenges and promises for tissue analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Fuchs; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Localization of Diagnostically Relevant Regions of Interest in Whole Slide Images: a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ezgi Mercan; Selim Aksoy; Linda G Shapiro; Donald L Weaver; Tad T Brunyé; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Learning regions of interest from low level maps in virtual microscopy.

Authors:  David Romo; Eduardo Romero; Fabio González
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Regulatory barriers surrounding the use of whole slide imaging in the United States of America.

Authors:  Anil V Parwani; Lewis Hassell; Eric Glassy; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2014-10-21

8.  Effect of display resolution on time to diagnosis with virtual pathology slides in a systematic search task.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Thilina Ambepitiya; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Roy A Ruddle; David Brettle; Rhys G Thomas; Darren Treanor
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Mouse cursor movement and eye tracking data as an indicator of pathologists' attention when viewing digital whole slide images.

Authors:  Vignesh Raghunath; Melissa O Braxton; Stephanie A Gagnon; Tad T Brunyé; Kimberly H Allison; Lisa M Reisch; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore; Linda G Shapiro
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  Eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Patricia A Carney; Kimberly H Allison; Linda G Shapiro; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.