Literature DB >> 29600333

Predictors of surgical intervention following initial surveillance for acute ureteric colic.

Mohit Bajaj1, Lance Yuan1, Lauren C Holmes2, Michael Rice1, Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify clinical and stone-related factors predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients who were clinically considered appropriate for non-surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a contemporary cohort of patients who were selected for surveillance following presentation with acute ureteric colic. Data on patient demographic and stone variables, inpatient management and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to generate a nomogram predicting need for surgical intervention. The accuracy of the nomogram was subsequently validated with an independent cohort of patients presenting with ureteric colic.
RESULTS: Of 870 study eligible patients presenting with acute ureteric colic, 527 were initially treated non-surgically and included in the analysis. 113 of these eventually required surgical intervention. Median time from first presentation to acute surgery was 11 (IQR 4-82) days. In our final MVA analysis, duration of symptoms more than 3 days, not receiving alpha-blockers, positive history of previous renal calculi and stone location, burden and density were independent predictors of need for surgical intervention. Patients who required opioid analgesia were more likely to have surgical intervention; however, this did not reach statistical significance. The area under the curve (AUC) of the final model was 0.802. The nomogram was validated with a cohort of 210 consecutive colic patients with AUC of 0.833 (SE 0.041, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified independent predictors of the need for surgical intervention during an episode of renal colic and formulated a nomogram. Combined with the diligent use of acute ureteroscopy at our centre, this nomogram may have clinical utility when making decisions regarding treatment options with potential healthcare cost savings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nephrolithiasis; Nomograms; Renal colic; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600333     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2279-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A novel approach for accurate prediction of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones: support vector machines.

Authors:  F Dal Moro; A Abate; G R G Lanckriet; G Arandjelovic; P Gasparella; P Bassi; M Mancini; F Pagano
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Epidemiology of stone disease.

Authors:  Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Temporal trends of acute nephrolithiasis in Auckland, New Zealand.

Authors:  Jason Du; Richard Johnston; Michael Rice
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2009-07-24

6.  Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.

Authors:  Enrique Perez Castro; Palle J S Osther; Viorel Jinga; Hassan Razvi; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Kandarp Parikh; Ali R Kural; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi.

Authors:  W A Hübner; P Irby; M L Stoller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Geoffrey Joyce; Anga R Timilsina
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Economics and cost of care of stone disease.

Authors:  Yair Lotan
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.620

View more
  3 in total

1.  A machine learning model for predicting surgical intervention in renal colic due to ureteral stone(s) < 5 mm.

Authors:  Miki Haifler; Nir Kleinmann; Rennen Haramaty; Dorit E Zilberman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  When should we give up on expectant management for patients with proximal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Igal Shpunt; Etay Elbaz; Yuval Avda; Jonathan Modai; Dan Leibovici; Brian Berkowitz; Yaniv Shilo
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-12-29

3.  The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention.

Authors:  Maomao He; Xiaoting Lin; Ming Lei; Xiaolan Xu; Zhihui He
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.