Literature DB >> 19455606

Germline hypermethylation of MLH1 and EPCAM deletions are a frequent cause of Lynch syndrome.

Renée C Niessen1, Robert M W Hofstra, Helga Westers, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Krista Kooi, Paul O J Jager, Marloes L de Groote, Trijnie Dijkhuizen, Maran J W Olderode-Berends, Harry Hollema, Jan H Kleibeuker, Rolf H Sijmons.   

Abstract

It was shown that Lynch syndrome can be caused by germline hypermethylation of the MLH1 and MSH2 promoters. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated very recently that germline deletions of the 3' region of EPCAM cause transcriptional read-through which results in silencing of MSH2 by hypermethylation. We wanted to determine the prevalence of germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and of germline and somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in a large group of Lynch syndrome-suspected patients. From a group of 331 Lynch Syndrome-suspected patients we selected cases, who had no germline MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 mutation and whose tumors showed loss of MLH1 or MSH2, or, if staining was unavailable, had a tumor with microsatellite instability. Methylation assays were performed to test these patients for germline MLH1 and/or MSH2 promoter hypermethylation. Two patients with germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and no patients with germline MSH2 promoter hypermethylation were identified. In the subgroup screened for germline MSH2 promoter hypermethylation, we identified 3 patients with somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in their tumors, which was caused by a germline EPCAM deletion. In the group of 331 Lynch Syndrome-suspected patients, the frequencies of germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation caused by germline EPCAM deletions are 0.6 and 0.9%, respectively. These mutations, therefore, seem to be rather infrequent. However, the contribution of germline MLH1 hypermethylation and EPCAM deletions to the genetically proven Lynch syndrome cases in this cohort is very high. Previously 27 pathogenic mutations were identified; the newly identified mutations now represent 16% of all mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455606     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  61 in total

1.  Identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome using targeted evaluations and genetic testing: National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer joint practice guideline.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Randall Burt; James Church; Steve Erdman; Heather Hampel; Spring Holter; Kory Jasperson; Matt F Kalady; Joy Larsen Haidle; Henry T Lynch; Selvi Palaniappan; Paul E Wise; Leigha Senter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing.

Authors:  E Lastra; M García-González; B Llorente; C Bernuy; M J Barrio; L Pérez-Cabornero; M Durán; C García-Girón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  EPCAM germ line deletions as causes of Lynch syndrome in Spanish patients.

Authors:  Carla Guarinos; Adela Castillejo; Víctor-Manuel Barberá; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Ana-Beatriz Sánchez-Heras; Angel Segura; Carmen Guillén-Ponce; Ana Martínez-Cantó; María-Isabel Castillejo; Cecilia-Magdalena Egoavil; Rodrigo Jover; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; José-Luís Soto
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  Finding the needle in a haystack: identification of cases of Lynch syndrome with MLH1 epimutation.

Authors:  Megan P Hitchins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  History, genetics, and strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Clinical utility gene card for: Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM) - update 2012.

Authors:  Nils Rahner; Verena Steinke; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Francois Eisinger; Pierre Hutter; Sylviane Olschwang
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  De novo constitutional MLH1 epimutations confer early-onset colorectal cancer in two new sporadic Lynch syndrome cases, with derivation of the epimutation on the paternal allele in one.

Authors:  Ajay Goel; Thuy-Phuong Nguyen; Hon-Chiu E Leung; Takeshi Nagasaka; Jennifer Rhees; Erin Hotchkiss; Mildred Arnold; Pia Banerji; Minoru Koi; Chau-To Kwok; Deborah Packham; Lara Lipton; C Richard Boland; Robyn L Ward; Megan P Hitchins
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Frequency of deletions of EPCAM (TACSTD1) in MSH2-associated Lynch syndrome cases.

Authors:  Kandelaria Rumilla; Karen V Schowalter; Noralane M Lindor; Brittany C Thomas; Kara A Mensink; Steven Gallinger; Spring Holter; Polly A Newcomb; John D Potter; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; Tiffany I Long; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert W Haile; Graham Casey; Peter W Laird; Loic Le Marchand; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Allele-specific CDH1 downregulation and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hugo Pinheiro; Renata Bordeira-Carriço; Susana Seixas; Joana Carvalho; Janine Senz; Patrícia Oliveira; Patrícia Inácio; Leonor Gusmão; Jorge Rocha; David Huntsman; Raquel Seruca; Carla Oliveira
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Early onset MSI-H colon cancer with MLH1 promoter methylation, is there a genetic predisposition?

Authors:  Eddy H J van Roon; Marjo van Puijenbroek; Anneke Middeldorp; Ronald van Eijk; Emile J de Meijer; Dianhdra Erasmus; Kim A D Wouters; Manon van Engeland; Jan Oosting; Frederik J Hes; Carli M J Tops; Tom van Wezel; Judith M Boer; Hans Morreau
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.