Literature DB >> 29594854

Blended shared control utilizing online identification : Regulating grasping forces of a surrogate surgical grasper.

Trevor K Stephens1, Nathan J Kong2, Rodney L Dockter2, John J O'Neill2, Robert M Sweet3, Timothy M Kowalewski2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical robots are increasingly common, yet routine tasks such as tissue grasping remain potentially harmful with high occurrences of tissue crush injury due to the lack of force feedback from the grasper. This work aims to investigate whether a blended shared control framework which utilizes real-time identification of the object being grasped as part of the feedback may help address the prevalence of tissue crush injury in robotic surgeries.
METHODS: This work tests the proposed shared control framework and tissue identification algorithm on a custom surrogate surgical robotic grasping setup. This scheme utilizes identification of the object being grasped as part of the feedback to regulate to a desired force. The blended shared control is arbitrated between human and an implicit force controller based on a computed confidence in the identification of the grasped object. The online identification is performed using least squares based on a nonlinear tissue model. Testing was performed on five silicone tissue surrogates. Twenty grasps were conducted, with half of the grasps performed under manual control and half of the grasps performed with the proposed blended shared control, to test the efficacy of the control scheme.
RESULTS: The identification method resulted in an average of 95% accuracy across all time samples of all tissue grasps using a full leave-grasp-out cross-validation. There was an average convergence time of [Formula: see text] ms across all training grasps for all tissue surrogates. Additionally, there was a reduction in peak forces induced during grasping for all tissue surrogates when applying blended shared control online.
CONCLUSION: The blended shared control using online identification more successfully regulated grasping forces to the desired target force when compared with manual control. The preliminary work on this surrogate setup for surgical grasping merits further investigation on real surgical tools and with real human tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; Shared control; Tissue crush injury; Tissue identification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594854     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1745-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  8 in total

1.  Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M MacFarlane; J Rosen; B Hannaford; C Pellegrini; M Sinanan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Tholey; Jaydev P Desai; Andres E Castellanos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  A M Okamura
Journal:  Ind Rob       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Gaussian Process Regression for Sensorless Grip Force Estimation of Cable Driven Elongated Surgical Instruments.

Authors:  Yangming Li; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 5.  Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health.

Authors:  Hossein S Mirheydar; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Management of ureteric injuries during gynecological operations: 10 years experience.

Authors:  Panos Sakellariou; Athanasios G Protopapas; Zannis Voulgaris; Nikolaos Kyritsis; Alexandros Rodolakis; Georgios Vlachos; Emmanuel Diakomanolis; Stylianos Michalas
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2002-03-10       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Grasper trauma during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D D Marucci; A J Shakeshaft; J A Cartmill; M R Cox; S G Adams; C J Martin
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-08

8.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J H Peters; G D Gibbons; J T Innes; K E Nichols; M E Front; S R Roby; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.